What Money Can’t Buy: Wealth, Inequality, and Economic Satisfaction in the Rentier State

Jocelyn Mitchell, Justin J. Gengler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

How do perceived inequalities in allocation impact citizen satisfaction with state-distributed benefits in rentier societies? Resource-rich rentier regimes are widely theorized to maintain the economic and political satisfaction of subjects through wealth distribution. Yet, while qualitative research in the rentier states of the Arabian Peninsula has identified unequal distribution as a source of discontent, the relative importance of objective versus subjective factors in shaping satisfaction at the individual level has never been systematically evaluated. Here we assess the impacts of inequality on the nexus between wealth and satisfaction among citizens of the richest rentier regime in the world: the state of Qatar. Using original, nationally representative survey data, we test the effects of two separate mechanisms of unequal distribution previously identified in the literature: group-based discrimination, and variation in individual access owing to informal influence. Results show that perceptions of both group- and individual-based inequality dampen satisfaction with state-distributed benefits, irrespective of objective socioeconomic well-being. The findings demonstrate that even in the most affluent of rentier states, economic satisfaction derives not only from absolute quantities of benefits but also from subjective impressions of fairness in the distribution process.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 May 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

money
economics
regime
citizen
Qatar
fairness
qualitative research
discrimination
Group
well-being
society
resources

Keywords

  • authoritarianism
  • distribution
  • Qatar
  • rents
  • state-society relationship
  • wasta

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

What Money Can’t Buy : Wealth, Inequality, and Economic Satisfaction in the Rentier State. / Mitchell, Jocelyn; Gengler, Justin J.

In: Political Research Quarterly, 01.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da233ce6f26f4d4db3620273437a4f0b,
title = "What Money Can’t Buy: Wealth, Inequality, and Economic Satisfaction in the Rentier State",
abstract = "How do perceived inequalities in allocation impact citizen satisfaction with state-distributed benefits in rentier societies? Resource-rich rentier regimes are widely theorized to maintain the economic and political satisfaction of subjects through wealth distribution. Yet, while qualitative research in the rentier states of the Arabian Peninsula has identified unequal distribution as a source of discontent, the relative importance of objective versus subjective factors in shaping satisfaction at the individual level has never been systematically evaluated. Here we assess the impacts of inequality on the nexus between wealth and satisfaction among citizens of the richest rentier regime in the world: the state of Qatar. Using original, nationally representative survey data, we test the effects of two separate mechanisms of unequal distribution previously identified in the literature: group-based discrimination, and variation in individual access owing to informal influence. Results show that perceptions of both group- and individual-based inequality dampen satisfaction with state-distributed benefits, irrespective of objective socioeconomic well-being. The findings demonstrate that even in the most affluent of rentier states, economic satisfaction derives not only from absolute quantities of benefits but also from subjective impressions of fairness in the distribution process.",
keywords = "authoritarianism, distribution, Qatar, rents, state-society relationship, wasta",
author = "Jocelyn Mitchell and Gengler, {Justin J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1065912918776128",
language = "English",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What Money Can’t Buy

T2 - Wealth, Inequality, and Economic Satisfaction in the Rentier State

AU - Mitchell, Jocelyn

AU - Gengler, Justin J.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - How do perceived inequalities in allocation impact citizen satisfaction with state-distributed benefits in rentier societies? Resource-rich rentier regimes are widely theorized to maintain the economic and political satisfaction of subjects through wealth distribution. Yet, while qualitative research in the rentier states of the Arabian Peninsula has identified unequal distribution as a source of discontent, the relative importance of objective versus subjective factors in shaping satisfaction at the individual level has never been systematically evaluated. Here we assess the impacts of inequality on the nexus between wealth and satisfaction among citizens of the richest rentier regime in the world: the state of Qatar. Using original, nationally representative survey data, we test the effects of two separate mechanisms of unequal distribution previously identified in the literature: group-based discrimination, and variation in individual access owing to informal influence. Results show that perceptions of both group- and individual-based inequality dampen satisfaction with state-distributed benefits, irrespective of objective socioeconomic well-being. The findings demonstrate that even in the most affluent of rentier states, economic satisfaction derives not only from absolute quantities of benefits but also from subjective impressions of fairness in the distribution process.

AB - How do perceived inequalities in allocation impact citizen satisfaction with state-distributed benefits in rentier societies? Resource-rich rentier regimes are widely theorized to maintain the economic and political satisfaction of subjects through wealth distribution. Yet, while qualitative research in the rentier states of the Arabian Peninsula has identified unequal distribution as a source of discontent, the relative importance of objective versus subjective factors in shaping satisfaction at the individual level has never been systematically evaluated. Here we assess the impacts of inequality on the nexus between wealth and satisfaction among citizens of the richest rentier regime in the world: the state of Qatar. Using original, nationally representative survey data, we test the effects of two separate mechanisms of unequal distribution previously identified in the literature: group-based discrimination, and variation in individual access owing to informal influence. Results show that perceptions of both group- and individual-based inequality dampen satisfaction with state-distributed benefits, irrespective of objective socioeconomic well-being. The findings demonstrate that even in the most affluent of rentier states, economic satisfaction derives not only from absolute quantities of benefits but also from subjective impressions of fairness in the distribution process.

KW - authoritarianism

KW - distribution

KW - Qatar

KW - rents

KW - state-society relationship

KW - wasta

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047959528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047959528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1065912918776128

DO - 10.1177/1065912918776128

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047959528

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

ER -