Vaccinating health care workers during an influenza pandemic

S. Head, Stephen Atkin, K. Allan, C. Ferguson, S. Lutchmun, R. Cordery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, health care workers (HCWs) were offered immunization with H1N1 vaccine in addition to seasonal flu vaccine. Previously, low rates of influenza vaccine uptake in HCWs have been attributed to concerns about vaccine clinical effectiveness, side effects and access difficulties. Aims: To explore H1N1 influenza vaccination of HCWs in London during 2009-10 and examine reasons for vaccine refusal. Methods: An online questionnaire survey of doctors and nurses working in two primary care trust (PCT) areas and one acute trust area was carried out in London. Results: Only 59% of the 221 respondents had been immunized with H1N1 influenza vaccine and 43% with seasonal influenza vaccine. The commonest reasons for remaining unvaccinated were 'side effects', 'swine flu not severe' and 'concerns about clinical effectiveness of the vaccine'. Respondents who had been vaccinated that season gave positive feedback on their experience. Conclusions: While uptake among HCWs was greater for the pandemic vaccine than is usually seen with seasonal influenza vaccine, this survey suggests that in this area of London during the 2009 pandemic, HCWs refused H1N1 vaccination due to concerns about clinical effectiveness, side effects and perceptions that H1N1 infection was not generally severe. We found no evidence to suggest poor access was a barrier to H1N1 vaccination of HCWs. If good access is maintained, the key barrier to improving seasonal flu vaccine uptake lies with informing the personal risk assessment made by the HCW.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)651-654
Number of pages4
JournalOccupational Medicine
Volume62
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pandemics
Influenza Vaccines
Human Influenza
Delivery of Health Care
Vaccines
Vaccination
Immunization
Primary Health Care
Swine
Nurses
Surveys and Questionnaires
Infection

Keywords

  • Health care workers
  • Hospital staff
  • Immunization
  • Influenza
  • Occupational health care delivery
  • Primary health care
  • Vaccination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Head, S., Atkin, S., Allan, K., Ferguson, C., Lutchmun, S., & Cordery, R. (2012). Vaccinating health care workers during an influenza pandemic. Occupational Medicine, 62(8), 651-654. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs098

Vaccinating health care workers during an influenza pandemic. / Head, S.; Atkin, Stephen; Allan, K.; Ferguson, C.; Lutchmun, S.; Cordery, R.

In: Occupational Medicine, Vol. 62, No. 8, 12.2012, p. 651-654.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Head, S, Atkin, S, Allan, K, Ferguson, C, Lutchmun, S & Cordery, R 2012, 'Vaccinating health care workers during an influenza pandemic', Occupational Medicine, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 651-654. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs098
Head, S. ; Atkin, Stephen ; Allan, K. ; Ferguson, C. ; Lutchmun, S. ; Cordery, R. / Vaccinating health care workers during an influenza pandemic. In: Occupational Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 62, No. 8. pp. 651-654.
@article{cb7f10bda2f740cf84fa17d77c524689,
title = "Vaccinating health care workers during an influenza pandemic",
abstract = "Background: In response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, health care workers (HCWs) were offered immunization with H1N1 vaccine in addition to seasonal flu vaccine. Previously, low rates of influenza vaccine uptake in HCWs have been attributed to concerns about vaccine clinical effectiveness, side effects and access difficulties. Aims: To explore H1N1 influenza vaccination of HCWs in London during 2009-10 and examine reasons for vaccine refusal. Methods: An online questionnaire survey of doctors and nurses working in two primary care trust (PCT) areas and one acute trust area was carried out in London. Results: Only 59{\%} of the 221 respondents had been immunized with H1N1 influenza vaccine and 43{\%} with seasonal influenza vaccine. The commonest reasons for remaining unvaccinated were 'side effects', 'swine flu not severe' and 'concerns about clinical effectiveness of the vaccine'. Respondents who had been vaccinated that season gave positive feedback on their experience. Conclusions: While uptake among HCWs was greater for the pandemic vaccine than is usually seen with seasonal influenza vaccine, this survey suggests that in this area of London during the 2009 pandemic, HCWs refused H1N1 vaccination due to concerns about clinical effectiveness, side effects and perceptions that H1N1 infection was not generally severe. We found no evidence to suggest poor access was a barrier to H1N1 vaccination of HCWs. If good access is maintained, the key barrier to improving seasonal flu vaccine uptake lies with informing the personal risk assessment made by the HCW.",
keywords = "Health care workers, Hospital staff, Immunization, Influenza, Occupational health care delivery, Primary health care, Vaccination",
author = "S. Head and Stephen Atkin and K. Allan and C. Ferguson and S. Lutchmun and R. Cordery",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1093/occmed/kqs098",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "651--654",
journal = "Occupational Medicine",
issn = "0962-7480",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vaccinating health care workers during an influenza pandemic

AU - Head, S.

AU - Atkin, Stephen

AU - Allan, K.

AU - Ferguson, C.

AU - Lutchmun, S.

AU - Cordery, R.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Background: In response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, health care workers (HCWs) were offered immunization with H1N1 vaccine in addition to seasonal flu vaccine. Previously, low rates of influenza vaccine uptake in HCWs have been attributed to concerns about vaccine clinical effectiveness, side effects and access difficulties. Aims: To explore H1N1 influenza vaccination of HCWs in London during 2009-10 and examine reasons for vaccine refusal. Methods: An online questionnaire survey of doctors and nurses working in two primary care trust (PCT) areas and one acute trust area was carried out in London. Results: Only 59% of the 221 respondents had been immunized with H1N1 influenza vaccine and 43% with seasonal influenza vaccine. The commonest reasons for remaining unvaccinated were 'side effects', 'swine flu not severe' and 'concerns about clinical effectiveness of the vaccine'. Respondents who had been vaccinated that season gave positive feedback on their experience. Conclusions: While uptake among HCWs was greater for the pandemic vaccine than is usually seen with seasonal influenza vaccine, this survey suggests that in this area of London during the 2009 pandemic, HCWs refused H1N1 vaccination due to concerns about clinical effectiveness, side effects and perceptions that H1N1 infection was not generally severe. We found no evidence to suggest poor access was a barrier to H1N1 vaccination of HCWs. If good access is maintained, the key barrier to improving seasonal flu vaccine uptake lies with informing the personal risk assessment made by the HCW.

AB - Background: In response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic, health care workers (HCWs) were offered immunization with H1N1 vaccine in addition to seasonal flu vaccine. Previously, low rates of influenza vaccine uptake in HCWs have been attributed to concerns about vaccine clinical effectiveness, side effects and access difficulties. Aims: To explore H1N1 influenza vaccination of HCWs in London during 2009-10 and examine reasons for vaccine refusal. Methods: An online questionnaire survey of doctors and nurses working in two primary care trust (PCT) areas and one acute trust area was carried out in London. Results: Only 59% of the 221 respondents had been immunized with H1N1 influenza vaccine and 43% with seasonal influenza vaccine. The commonest reasons for remaining unvaccinated were 'side effects', 'swine flu not severe' and 'concerns about clinical effectiveness of the vaccine'. Respondents who had been vaccinated that season gave positive feedback on their experience. Conclusions: While uptake among HCWs was greater for the pandemic vaccine than is usually seen with seasonal influenza vaccine, this survey suggests that in this area of London during the 2009 pandemic, HCWs refused H1N1 vaccination due to concerns about clinical effectiveness, side effects and perceptions that H1N1 infection was not generally severe. We found no evidence to suggest poor access was a barrier to H1N1 vaccination of HCWs. If good access is maintained, the key barrier to improving seasonal flu vaccine uptake lies with informing the personal risk assessment made by the HCW.

KW - Health care workers

KW - Hospital staff

KW - Immunization

KW - Influenza

KW - Occupational health care delivery

KW - Primary health care

KW - Vaccination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869457250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869457250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/occmed/kqs098

DO - 10.1093/occmed/kqs098

M3 - Article

C2 - 22773657

AN - SCOPUS:84869457250

VL - 62

SP - 651

EP - 654

JO - Occupational Medicine

JF - Occupational Medicine

SN - 0962-7480

IS - 8

ER -