Treatment of petroleum drill cuttings using bioaugmentation and biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation

Reginald Kogbara, Innocent Ogar, Reuben N. Okparanma, Josiah M. Ayotamuno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study sought to compare the effectiveness of bioaugmentation and biostimulation, as well as the combination of both techniques, supplemented with phytoremediation, in the decontamination of petroleum drill cuttings. Drill cuttings with relatively low concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and metals were mixed with soil in the ratio 5:1 and treated with three different combinations of the bioremediation options. Option A entailed bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. Option B had the combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. While biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation was deployed in option C. Option O containing the drill cuttings–soil mixture without treatment served as untreated control. Fertilizer application, tillage and watering were used for biostimulation treatment, while spent mushroom substrate (Pleurotus ostreatus) and elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) were employed for bioaugmentation and phytoremediation treatment, respectively. The drill cuttings–soil mixtures were monitored for TPH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, pH, metal concentrations, and fungal counts, over time. After 56�days of treatment, there was a decline in the initial TPH concentration of 4,114�mg kg−1 by 5.5%, 68.3%, 75.6% and 48% in options O, A, B and C, respectively. Generally, higher TPH loss resulted from the phytoremediation treatment stage. The treated options also showed slight reductions in metal concentrations ranging from 0% to 16% of the initial low concentrations. The results highlight the effectiveness of bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. The combination of bioaugmentation and biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation, however, may prove better in decontaminating petroleum drill cuttings to environmentally benign levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)714-721
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering
Volume51
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Crude oil
Hydrocarbons
Metals
Bioremediation
Decontamination
Fertilizers
Organic carbon
Nitrogen
Soils
Substrates

Keywords

  • Bioremediation
  • elephant grass
  • metals
  • mycoremediation
  • spent mushroom substrate
  • total petroleum hydrocarbons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering

Cite this

Treatment of petroleum drill cuttings using bioaugmentation and biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation. / Kogbara, Reginald; Ogar, Innocent; Okparanma, Reuben N.; Ayotamuno, Josiah M.

In: Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 51, No. 9, 28.07.2016, p. 714-721.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f8c06f90cc324322ac1156b6cad3e4e3,
title = "Treatment of petroleum drill cuttings using bioaugmentation and biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation",
abstract = "This study sought to compare the effectiveness of bioaugmentation and biostimulation, as well as the combination of both techniques, supplemented with phytoremediation, in the decontamination of petroleum drill cuttings. Drill cuttings with relatively low concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and metals were mixed with soil in the ratio 5:1 and treated with three different combinations of the bioremediation options. Option A entailed bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. Option B had the combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. While biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation was deployed in option C. Option O containing the drill cuttings–soil mixture without treatment served as untreated control. Fertilizer application, tillage and watering were used for biostimulation treatment, while spent mushroom substrate (Pleurotus ostreatus) and elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) were employed for bioaugmentation and phytoremediation treatment, respectively. The drill cuttings–soil mixtures were monitored for TPH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, pH, metal concentrations, and fungal counts, over time. After 56�days of treatment, there was a decline in the initial TPH concentration of 4,114�mg kg−1 by 5.5{\%}, 68.3{\%}, 75.6{\%} and 48{\%} in options O, A, B and C, respectively. Generally, higher TPH loss resulted from the phytoremediation treatment stage. The treated options also showed slight reductions in metal concentrations ranging from 0{\%} to 16{\%} of the initial low concentrations. The results highlight the effectiveness of bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. The combination of bioaugmentation and biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation, however, may prove better in decontaminating petroleum drill cuttings to environmentally benign levels.",
keywords = "Bioremediation, elephant grass, metals, mycoremediation, spent mushroom substrate, total petroleum hydrocarbons",
author = "Reginald Kogbara and Innocent Ogar and Okparanma, {Reuben N.} and Ayotamuno, {Josiah M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/10934529.2016.1170437",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "714--721",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering",
issn = "1093-4529",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment of petroleum drill cuttings using bioaugmentation and biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation

AU - Kogbara, Reginald

AU - Ogar, Innocent

AU - Okparanma, Reuben N.

AU - Ayotamuno, Josiah M.

PY - 2016/7/28

Y1 - 2016/7/28

N2 - This study sought to compare the effectiveness of bioaugmentation and biostimulation, as well as the combination of both techniques, supplemented with phytoremediation, in the decontamination of petroleum drill cuttings. Drill cuttings with relatively low concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and metals were mixed with soil in the ratio 5:1 and treated with three different combinations of the bioremediation options. Option A entailed bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. Option B had the combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. While biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation was deployed in option C. Option O containing the drill cuttings–soil mixture without treatment served as untreated control. Fertilizer application, tillage and watering were used for biostimulation treatment, while spent mushroom substrate (Pleurotus ostreatus) and elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) were employed for bioaugmentation and phytoremediation treatment, respectively. The drill cuttings–soil mixtures were monitored for TPH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, pH, metal concentrations, and fungal counts, over time. After 56�days of treatment, there was a decline in the initial TPH concentration of 4,114�mg kg−1 by 5.5%, 68.3%, 75.6% and 48% in options O, A, B and C, respectively. Generally, higher TPH loss resulted from the phytoremediation treatment stage. The treated options also showed slight reductions in metal concentrations ranging from 0% to 16% of the initial low concentrations. The results highlight the effectiveness of bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. The combination of bioaugmentation and biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation, however, may prove better in decontaminating petroleum drill cuttings to environmentally benign levels.

AB - This study sought to compare the effectiveness of bioaugmentation and biostimulation, as well as the combination of both techniques, supplemented with phytoremediation, in the decontamination of petroleum drill cuttings. Drill cuttings with relatively low concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and metals were mixed with soil in the ratio 5:1 and treated with three different combinations of the bioremediation options. Option A entailed bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. Option B had the combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. While biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation was deployed in option C. Option O containing the drill cuttings–soil mixture without treatment served as untreated control. Fertilizer application, tillage and watering were used for biostimulation treatment, while spent mushroom substrate (Pleurotus ostreatus) and elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) were employed for bioaugmentation and phytoremediation treatment, respectively. The drill cuttings–soil mixtures were monitored for TPH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, pH, metal concentrations, and fungal counts, over time. After 56�days of treatment, there was a decline in the initial TPH concentration of 4,114�mg kg−1 by 5.5%, 68.3%, 75.6% and 48% in options O, A, B and C, respectively. Generally, higher TPH loss resulted from the phytoremediation treatment stage. The treated options also showed slight reductions in metal concentrations ranging from 0% to 16% of the initial low concentrations. The results highlight the effectiveness of bioaugmentation supplemented with phytoremediation. The combination of bioaugmentation and biostimulation supplemented with phytoremediation, however, may prove better in decontaminating petroleum drill cuttings to environmentally benign levels.

KW - Bioremediation

KW - elephant grass

KW - metals

KW - mycoremediation

KW - spent mushroom substrate

KW - total petroleum hydrocarbons

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994589597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994589597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10934529.2016.1170437

DO - 10.1080/10934529.2016.1170437

M3 - Article

C2 - 27128694

AN - SCOPUS:84994589597

VL - 51

SP - 714

EP - 721

JO - Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering

JF - Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering

SN - 1093-4529

IS - 9

ER -