Trafficking and contract migrant workers in the middle east

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper addresses a number of issues regarding the extent to which trafficking may be applied to migrant domestic workers who enter under the kafala system of sponsorship in the Middle East. Migrant domestic workers are the most numerous of those mentioned in reports on trafficking for labour exploitation in the region. The discussion seeks to determine whether " trafficking" can be ex post facto, rather than ex ante? In other words, can the label of trafficking be attributed only after the worker has arrived in the receiving country and is victimized according to the principles of trafficking protocols? In addition, must there be a proven intent to traffic by agents, or can employers who harm and/or exploit them be considered as traffickers alone? Should the harm done to workers on arrival at their place of work be classified (and assisted) as victims of trafficking, or as exploited workers?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-163
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Migration
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

migrant worker
Middle East
worker
migrant
sponsorship
exploitation
employer
traffic
labor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography

Cite this

Trafficking and contract migrant workers in the middle east. / Jureidini, Rajai.

In: International Migration, Vol. 48, No. 4, 08.2010, p. 142-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{69e5a7a0c2094afea1ce191edcc024d5,
title = "Trafficking and contract migrant workers in the middle east",
abstract = "The paper addresses a number of issues regarding the extent to which trafficking may be applied to migrant domestic workers who enter under the kafala system of sponsorship in the Middle East. Migrant domestic workers are the most numerous of those mentioned in reports on trafficking for labour exploitation in the region. The discussion seeks to determine whether {"} trafficking{"} can be ex post facto, rather than ex ante? In other words, can the label of trafficking be attributed only after the worker has arrived in the receiving country and is victimized according to the principles of trafficking protocols? In addition, must there be a proven intent to traffic by agents, or can employers who harm and/or exploit them be considered as traffickers alone? Should the harm done to workers on arrival at their place of work be classified (and assisted) as victims of trafficking, or as exploited workers?",
author = "Rajai Jureidini",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00614.x",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "142--163",
journal = "International Migration",
issn = "0020-7985",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trafficking and contract migrant workers in the middle east

AU - Jureidini, Rajai

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - The paper addresses a number of issues regarding the extent to which trafficking may be applied to migrant domestic workers who enter under the kafala system of sponsorship in the Middle East. Migrant domestic workers are the most numerous of those mentioned in reports on trafficking for labour exploitation in the region. The discussion seeks to determine whether " trafficking" can be ex post facto, rather than ex ante? In other words, can the label of trafficking be attributed only after the worker has arrived in the receiving country and is victimized according to the principles of trafficking protocols? In addition, must there be a proven intent to traffic by agents, or can employers who harm and/or exploit them be considered as traffickers alone? Should the harm done to workers on arrival at their place of work be classified (and assisted) as victims of trafficking, or as exploited workers?

AB - The paper addresses a number of issues regarding the extent to which trafficking may be applied to migrant domestic workers who enter under the kafala system of sponsorship in the Middle East. Migrant domestic workers are the most numerous of those mentioned in reports on trafficking for labour exploitation in the region. The discussion seeks to determine whether " trafficking" can be ex post facto, rather than ex ante? In other words, can the label of trafficking be attributed only after the worker has arrived in the receiving country and is victimized according to the principles of trafficking protocols? In addition, must there be a proven intent to traffic by agents, or can employers who harm and/or exploit them be considered as traffickers alone? Should the harm done to workers on arrival at their place of work be classified (and assisted) as victims of trafficking, or as exploited workers?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955043022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955043022&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00614.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00614.x

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 142

EP - 163

JO - International Migration

JF - International Migration

SN - 0020-7985

IS - 4

ER -