The stability of the h-index

Monika Henzinger, Jacob Suñol, Ingmar Weber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the last years the h-index has gained popularity as a measure for comparing the impact of scientists. We investigate if ranking according to the h-index is stable with respect to (i) different choices of citation databases, (ii) normalizing citation counts by the number of authors or by removing self-citations, (iii) small amounts of noise created by randomly removing citations or publications and (iv) small changes in the definition of the index. In experiments for 5,283 computer scientists and 1,354 physicists we show that although the ranking of the h-index is stable under most of these changes, it is unstable when different databases are used. Therefore, comparisons based on the h-index should only be trusted when the rankings of multiple citation databases agree.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)465-479
Number of pages15
JournalScientometrics
Volume84
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ranking
computer scientist
popularity
Experiments
experiment

Keywords

  • Citation databases
  • h-index
  • Ranking scientists
  • Stability analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Cite this

The stability of the h-index. / Henzinger, Monika; Suñol, Jacob; Weber, Ingmar.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 84, No. 2, 01.01.2010, p. 465-479.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henzinger, M, Suñol, J & Weber, I 2010, 'The stability of the h-index', Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 465-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0098-7
Henzinger, Monika ; Suñol, Jacob ; Weber, Ingmar. / The stability of the h-index. In: Scientometrics. 2010 ; Vol. 84, No. 2. pp. 465-479.
@article{ffa4ce11de6743d8bdc57ebdf81dfa6a,
title = "The stability of the h-index",
abstract = "Over the last years the h-index has gained popularity as a measure for comparing the impact of scientists. We investigate if ranking according to the h-index is stable with respect to (i) different choices of citation databases, (ii) normalizing citation counts by the number of authors or by removing self-citations, (iii) small amounts of noise created by randomly removing citations or publications and (iv) small changes in the definition of the index. In experiments for 5,283 computer scientists and 1,354 physicists we show that although the ranking of the h-index is stable under most of these changes, it is unstable when different databases are used. Therefore, comparisons based on the h-index should only be trusted when the rankings of multiple citation databases agree.",
keywords = "Citation databases, h-index, Ranking scientists, Stability analysis",
author = "Monika Henzinger and Jacob Su{\~n}ol and Ingmar Weber",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-009-0098-7",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "465--479",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The stability of the h-index

AU - Henzinger, Monika

AU - Suñol, Jacob

AU - Weber, Ingmar

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Over the last years the h-index has gained popularity as a measure for comparing the impact of scientists. We investigate if ranking according to the h-index is stable with respect to (i) different choices of citation databases, (ii) normalizing citation counts by the number of authors or by removing self-citations, (iii) small amounts of noise created by randomly removing citations or publications and (iv) small changes in the definition of the index. In experiments for 5,283 computer scientists and 1,354 physicists we show that although the ranking of the h-index is stable under most of these changes, it is unstable when different databases are used. Therefore, comparisons based on the h-index should only be trusted when the rankings of multiple citation databases agree.

AB - Over the last years the h-index has gained popularity as a measure for comparing the impact of scientists. We investigate if ranking according to the h-index is stable with respect to (i) different choices of citation databases, (ii) normalizing citation counts by the number of authors or by removing self-citations, (iii) small amounts of noise created by randomly removing citations or publications and (iv) small changes in the definition of the index. In experiments for 5,283 computer scientists and 1,354 physicists we show that although the ranking of the h-index is stable under most of these changes, it is unstable when different databases are used. Therefore, comparisons based on the h-index should only be trusted when the rankings of multiple citation databases agree.

KW - Citation databases

KW - h-index

KW - Ranking scientists

KW - Stability analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953694845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953694845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-009-0098-7

DO - 10.1007/s11192-009-0098-7

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953694845

VL - 84

SP - 465

EP - 479

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 2

ER -