The size and performance of offshore produced water oil-removal technologies for reinjection

S. Judd, H. Qiblawey, Jaber Al Marri, C. Clarkin, S. Watson, A. Ahmed, S. Bach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Produced water (PW) is wastewater generated from oil exploration, and requires treating for oil and suspended solids removal. The viability of an effluent treatment unit process for this duty is dependent both on its efficacy, in terms of oil removal and - for offshore applications especially - its size, in terms of its area (FA, m/h) and volume (FV, h -1) footprint per unit volume flow. The incurred footprint applies to both the individual unit (vessel, column or tank) and the collection (or array) of units/vessels in a skid. An assessment of unit process footprint based on available information has been conducted, in particular to the case where high-quality treated water is required for reinjection. The analysis encompasses technical data from specific proprietary technologies as well as generic information for process technology types. Technologies considered comprised hydrocyclones (HCs), induced gas flotation (IGF), media (nutshell) filtration (NSF), and crossflow membrane filtration (CMF). The analysis revealed the HC to incur the smallest area footprint, less than half that of an IGF, notwithstanding only ∼0.15% of the total skid volume being used for the actual separation process. The CMF had a slightly smaller area footprint and less than half the volumetric footprint of the NSF, if the requirement for backflushing is considered. The fitting of the modular HC and CMF technologies to a skid incurs a considerable increase in the footprint, particularly for the HC where the volume occupancy is increased by an order of magnitude. It was concluded that spatial efficiency gains could be attained for modular processes if spacing of the HC vessels or membrane modules can be reduced, contributing significantly to the viability of CMF in particular.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-246
Number of pages6
JournalSeparation and Purification Technology
Volume134
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Sep 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oils
Membranes
Flotation
Chemical reactions
Gases
Membrane technology
Effluent treatment
Water quality
Information technology
Wastewater
Produced Water

Keywords

  • Filtration
  • Flotation
  • Footprint
  • Hydrocyclone
  • Oil
  • Produced water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

The size and performance of offshore produced water oil-removal technologies for reinjection. / Judd, S.; Qiblawey, H.; Al Marri, Jaber; Clarkin, C.; Watson, S.; Ahmed, A.; Bach, S.

In: Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 134, 25.09.2014, p. 241-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Judd, S. ; Qiblawey, H. ; Al Marri, Jaber ; Clarkin, C. ; Watson, S. ; Ahmed, A. ; Bach, S. / The size and performance of offshore produced water oil-removal technologies for reinjection. In: Separation and Purification Technology. 2014 ; Vol. 134. pp. 241-246.
@article{3506ea4c60c74fd088dd7957f69d5d50,
title = "The size and performance of offshore produced water oil-removal technologies for reinjection",
abstract = "Produced water (PW) is wastewater generated from oil exploration, and requires treating for oil and suspended solids removal. The viability of an effluent treatment unit process for this duty is dependent both on its efficacy, in terms of oil removal and - for offshore applications especially - its size, in terms of its area (FA, m/h) and volume (FV, h -1) footprint per unit volume flow. The incurred footprint applies to both the individual unit (vessel, column or tank) and the collection (or array) of units/vessels in a skid. An assessment of unit process footprint based on available information has been conducted, in particular to the case where high-quality treated water is required for reinjection. The analysis encompasses technical data from specific proprietary technologies as well as generic information for process technology types. Technologies considered comprised hydrocyclones (HCs), induced gas flotation (IGF), media (nutshell) filtration (NSF), and crossflow membrane filtration (CMF). The analysis revealed the HC to incur the smallest area footprint, less than half that of an IGF, notwithstanding only ∼0.15{\%} of the total skid volume being used for the actual separation process. The CMF had a slightly smaller area footprint and less than half the volumetric footprint of the NSF, if the requirement for backflushing is considered. The fitting of the modular HC and CMF technologies to a skid incurs a considerable increase in the footprint, particularly for the HC where the volume occupancy is increased by an order of magnitude. It was concluded that spatial efficiency gains could be attained for modular processes if spacing of the HC vessels or membrane modules can be reduced, contributing significantly to the viability of CMF in particular.",
keywords = "Filtration, Flotation, Footprint, Hydrocyclone, Oil, Produced water",
author = "S. Judd and H. Qiblawey and {Al Marri}, Jaber and C. Clarkin and S. Watson and A. Ahmed and S. Bach",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1016/j.seppur.2014.07.037",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "241--246",
journal = "Separation and Purification Technology",
issn = "1383-5866",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The size and performance of offshore produced water oil-removal technologies for reinjection

AU - Judd, S.

AU - Qiblawey, H.

AU - Al Marri, Jaber

AU - Clarkin, C.

AU - Watson, S.

AU - Ahmed, A.

AU - Bach, S.

PY - 2014/9/25

Y1 - 2014/9/25

N2 - Produced water (PW) is wastewater generated from oil exploration, and requires treating for oil and suspended solids removal. The viability of an effluent treatment unit process for this duty is dependent both on its efficacy, in terms of oil removal and - for offshore applications especially - its size, in terms of its area (FA, m/h) and volume (FV, h -1) footprint per unit volume flow. The incurred footprint applies to both the individual unit (vessel, column or tank) and the collection (or array) of units/vessels in a skid. An assessment of unit process footprint based on available information has been conducted, in particular to the case where high-quality treated water is required for reinjection. The analysis encompasses technical data from specific proprietary technologies as well as generic information for process technology types. Technologies considered comprised hydrocyclones (HCs), induced gas flotation (IGF), media (nutshell) filtration (NSF), and crossflow membrane filtration (CMF). The analysis revealed the HC to incur the smallest area footprint, less than half that of an IGF, notwithstanding only ∼0.15% of the total skid volume being used for the actual separation process. The CMF had a slightly smaller area footprint and less than half the volumetric footprint of the NSF, if the requirement for backflushing is considered. The fitting of the modular HC and CMF technologies to a skid incurs a considerable increase in the footprint, particularly for the HC where the volume occupancy is increased by an order of magnitude. It was concluded that spatial efficiency gains could be attained for modular processes if spacing of the HC vessels or membrane modules can be reduced, contributing significantly to the viability of CMF in particular.

AB - Produced water (PW) is wastewater generated from oil exploration, and requires treating for oil and suspended solids removal. The viability of an effluent treatment unit process for this duty is dependent both on its efficacy, in terms of oil removal and - for offshore applications especially - its size, in terms of its area (FA, m/h) and volume (FV, h -1) footprint per unit volume flow. The incurred footprint applies to both the individual unit (vessel, column or tank) and the collection (or array) of units/vessels in a skid. An assessment of unit process footprint based on available information has been conducted, in particular to the case where high-quality treated water is required for reinjection. The analysis encompasses technical data from specific proprietary technologies as well as generic information for process technology types. Technologies considered comprised hydrocyclones (HCs), induced gas flotation (IGF), media (nutshell) filtration (NSF), and crossflow membrane filtration (CMF). The analysis revealed the HC to incur the smallest area footprint, less than half that of an IGF, notwithstanding only ∼0.15% of the total skid volume being used for the actual separation process. The CMF had a slightly smaller area footprint and less than half the volumetric footprint of the NSF, if the requirement for backflushing is considered. The fitting of the modular HC and CMF technologies to a skid incurs a considerable increase in the footprint, particularly for the HC where the volume occupancy is increased by an order of magnitude. It was concluded that spatial efficiency gains could be attained for modular processes if spacing of the HC vessels or membrane modules can be reduced, contributing significantly to the viability of CMF in particular.

KW - Filtration

KW - Flotation

KW - Footprint

KW - Hydrocyclone

KW - Oil

KW - Produced water

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906671169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906671169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.07.037

DO - 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.07.037

M3 - Article

VL - 134

SP - 241

EP - 246

JO - Separation and Purification Technology

JF - Separation and Purification Technology

SN - 1383-5866

ER -