The role of asynchronous computer mediated communication in the instruction and development of EFL learners' pragmatic competence

Zohreh Eslami, Azizullah Mirzaei, Shadi Dini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates two types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of requests by Iranian EFL learners to determine the effectiveness of pragmatic instruction through asynchronous computer mediated communication (ACMC). Three groups of EFL learners, a control (. n=27) and two intervention groups, are included in this study. The intervention groups were matched with US-based graduate ESL Education students (as telecollaborative tutors) to undertake either an explicit or an implicit instructional treatment through ACMC for one semester. The explicit group (. n=23) participated in consciousness-raising activities, received explicit metapragmatic explanations and corrections of errors of forms and meanings. The implicit group (. n=24) received enhanced input and implicit feedback. A discourse completion task (DCT) was used to compare control and intervention groups. Furthermore, students' email communications with the graduate students were used to track their language development. Quantitative and qualitative analysis were used to determine the impact of instructional methods on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Both treatment groups significantly improved, outperforming the control group. However, the explicit group performed significantly better than the implicit group on both the DCT and email communication measures. These findings are discussed with implications for using technology to teach and learn pragmatics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)99-111
Number of pages13
JournalSystem
Volume48
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015

Fingerprint

computer-mediated communication
pragmatics
instruction
Group
graduate
Computer-mediated Communication
Asynchronous
Pragmatic Competence
EFL Learners
discourse
student
tutor
semester
consciousness
communications
Communication
Discourse Completion Tasks
Electronic Mail
communication

Keywords

  • Asynchronous computer mediated communication
  • English as a foreign language
  • Explicit/implicit pragmatic instruction
  • Pragmatic development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The role of asynchronous computer mediated communication in the instruction and development of EFL learners' pragmatic competence. / Eslami, Zohreh; Mirzaei, Azizullah; Dini, Shadi.

In: System, Vol. 48, 01.02.2015, p. 99-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7bc16914466e4f9c8aa8b9264a65a989,
title = "The role of asynchronous computer mediated communication in the instruction and development of EFL learners' pragmatic competence",
abstract = "This study investigates two types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of requests by Iranian EFL learners to determine the effectiveness of pragmatic instruction through asynchronous computer mediated communication (ACMC). Three groups of EFL learners, a control (. n=27) and two intervention groups, are included in this study. The intervention groups were matched with US-based graduate ESL Education students (as telecollaborative tutors) to undertake either an explicit or an implicit instructional treatment through ACMC for one semester. The explicit group (. n=23) participated in consciousness-raising activities, received explicit metapragmatic explanations and corrections of errors of forms and meanings. The implicit group (. n=24) received enhanced input and implicit feedback. A discourse completion task (DCT) was used to compare control and intervention groups. Furthermore, students' email communications with the graduate students were used to track their language development. Quantitative and qualitative analysis were used to determine the impact of instructional methods on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Both treatment groups significantly improved, outperforming the control group. However, the explicit group performed significantly better than the implicit group on both the DCT and email communication measures. These findings are discussed with implications for using technology to teach and learn pragmatics.",
keywords = "Asynchronous computer mediated communication, English as a foreign language, Explicit/implicit pragmatic instruction, Pragmatic development",
author = "Zohreh Eslami and Azizullah Mirzaei and Shadi Dini",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.system.2014.09.008",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "99--111",
journal = "System",
issn = "0346-251X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of asynchronous computer mediated communication in the instruction and development of EFL learners' pragmatic competence

AU - Eslami, Zohreh

AU - Mirzaei, Azizullah

AU - Dini, Shadi

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - This study investigates two types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of requests by Iranian EFL learners to determine the effectiveness of pragmatic instruction through asynchronous computer mediated communication (ACMC). Three groups of EFL learners, a control (. n=27) and two intervention groups, are included in this study. The intervention groups were matched with US-based graduate ESL Education students (as telecollaborative tutors) to undertake either an explicit or an implicit instructional treatment through ACMC for one semester. The explicit group (. n=23) participated in consciousness-raising activities, received explicit metapragmatic explanations and corrections of errors of forms and meanings. The implicit group (. n=24) received enhanced input and implicit feedback. A discourse completion task (DCT) was used to compare control and intervention groups. Furthermore, students' email communications with the graduate students were used to track their language development. Quantitative and qualitative analysis were used to determine the impact of instructional methods on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Both treatment groups significantly improved, outperforming the control group. However, the explicit group performed significantly better than the implicit group on both the DCT and email communication measures. These findings are discussed with implications for using technology to teach and learn pragmatics.

AB - This study investigates two types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of requests by Iranian EFL learners to determine the effectiveness of pragmatic instruction through asynchronous computer mediated communication (ACMC). Three groups of EFL learners, a control (. n=27) and two intervention groups, are included in this study. The intervention groups were matched with US-based graduate ESL Education students (as telecollaborative tutors) to undertake either an explicit or an implicit instructional treatment through ACMC for one semester. The explicit group (. n=23) participated in consciousness-raising activities, received explicit metapragmatic explanations and corrections of errors of forms and meanings. The implicit group (. n=24) received enhanced input and implicit feedback. A discourse completion task (DCT) was used to compare control and intervention groups. Furthermore, students' email communications with the graduate students were used to track their language development. Quantitative and qualitative analysis were used to determine the impact of instructional methods on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Both treatment groups significantly improved, outperforming the control group. However, the explicit group performed significantly better than the implicit group on both the DCT and email communication measures. These findings are discussed with implications for using technology to teach and learn pragmatics.

KW - Asynchronous computer mediated communication

KW - English as a foreign language

KW - Explicit/implicit pragmatic instruction

KW - Pragmatic development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027935417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027935417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.system.2014.09.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85027935417

VL - 48

SP - 99

EP - 111

JO - System

JF - System

SN - 0346-251X

ER -