The impact of bicameralism on legislative production

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is generally accepted by scholars, as well as by cameral partisans, that adding a second chamber to an otherwise unicameral legislative process will decrease the volume of laws that a legislature enacts. This study challenges the conventional wisdom. First, I offer a simple theoretical argument that shows that when second chambers can originate as well as reject legislation, bicameralism will have an indeterminate impact on legislative production. Second, I provide historical data gathered from the four U.S. states that have experienced cameral transitions. Although very rudimentary, the historical evidence, when coupled with the theoretical argument, raises serious doubt regarding the traditional claim that bicameralism reduces the production of legislation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalLegislative Studies Quarterly
Volume28
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

bicameralism
chamber
legislation
wisdom
Law
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The impact of bicameralism on legislative production. / Rogers, James.

In: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, 11.2003.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cae75b693f734aeba11100fe33677a60,
title = "The impact of bicameralism on legislative production",
abstract = "It is generally accepted by scholars, as well as by cameral partisans, that adding a second chamber to an otherwise unicameral legislative process will decrease the volume of laws that a legislature enacts. This study challenges the conventional wisdom. First, I offer a simple theoretical argument that shows that when second chambers can originate as well as reject legislation, bicameralism will have an indeterminate impact on legislative production. Second, I provide historical data gathered from the four U.S. states that have experienced cameral transitions. Although very rudimentary, the historical evidence, when coupled with the theoretical argument, raises serious doubt regarding the traditional claim that bicameralism reduces the production of legislation.",
author = "James Rogers",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
journal = "Legislative Studies Quarterly",
issn = "0362-9805",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of bicameralism on legislative production

AU - Rogers, James

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - It is generally accepted by scholars, as well as by cameral partisans, that adding a second chamber to an otherwise unicameral legislative process will decrease the volume of laws that a legislature enacts. This study challenges the conventional wisdom. First, I offer a simple theoretical argument that shows that when second chambers can originate as well as reject legislation, bicameralism will have an indeterminate impact on legislative production. Second, I provide historical data gathered from the four U.S. states that have experienced cameral transitions. Although very rudimentary, the historical evidence, when coupled with the theoretical argument, raises serious doubt regarding the traditional claim that bicameralism reduces the production of legislation.

AB - It is generally accepted by scholars, as well as by cameral partisans, that adding a second chamber to an otherwise unicameral legislative process will decrease the volume of laws that a legislature enacts. This study challenges the conventional wisdom. First, I offer a simple theoretical argument that shows that when second chambers can originate as well as reject legislation, bicameralism will have an indeterminate impact on legislative production. Second, I provide historical data gathered from the four U.S. states that have experienced cameral transitions. Although very rudimentary, the historical evidence, when coupled with the theoretical argument, raises serious doubt regarding the traditional claim that bicameralism reduces the production of legislation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042576509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042576509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:3042576509

VL - 28

JO - Legislative Studies Quarterly

JF - Legislative Studies Quarterly

SN - 0362-9805

IS - 4

ER -