Stability of foams in pipe and annulus

Abhishek Govindu, Ramadan Ahmed, Subhash Shah, Mahmood Amani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Foam fluids present numerous advantages for many oil field applications. Due to their bubble structure and a gaseous component, foams exhibit very high viscosity and low density. Low density makes foam an attractive fluid in underbalanced drilling operation in which light fluid is essential to maintain wellbore pressure below pore pressure. Due to its high viscosity, foam exhibits good hole-cleaning performance even at low annular velocities. Nevertheless, foams are thermodynamically unstable fluids and their structures eventually collapse. Foam decays as a function of time and the decay occurs mainly due to bubble coalescence and the gravity drainage of the liquid phase. Maintaining fluid stability is necessary for foam drilling. For a successful drilling operation, the half-life of foam, which is the time taken by foam to drain 50% of its liquid volume, should exceed circulation time. For other applications, such as hydraulic fracturing or cementing, the half-life of foam should exceed the time taken for fluid to reach target zones. In this study, foam stability experiments were conducted in a concentric annulus (50 mm × 75 mm) and 25-mm pipe sections. The pipe section was transparent to observe drained liquid level. Aqueous, polymer-based, and oil-based foams were considered in the investigation. The effect of gas volume fraction (quality) was studied under static condition. All experiments were performed at 400 kPa and ambient temperature (20 ± 2 °C). Foam quality was increased from 40% to 80%. However, at high qualities (greater than 70%), the oil-based foam was unstable. Hydrostatic pressure data was collected from the annular section and converted into density curves to determine drained liquid volume. In the pipe section, the drainage was physically measured from the liquid level and recorded periodically. A digital camera with a microscope was used to capture foam image in real-time to examine bubble coarsening and foam decay. For a given quality, the polymer-based foam was the most stable, while oil-based foam was the least. For all three types of foams, stability increased with quality. Foams were more stable in the annular section, as compared to the pipe, possibly due to the impact of container wall on bubbles and drained liquid motion. Foam decay and bubble coarsening were observed by comparing bubble sizes in captured images at various times. On average, larger bubbles were observed in higher quality foams. The rate at which foam bubbles coarsening mostly reduced with time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)594-604
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Volume180
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

foam
Foams
pipe
Pipe
bubble
liquid
Fluids
fluid
Liquids
Coarsening
Bubbles (in fluids)
drilling
half life
Drainage
oil
Drilling
viscosity
polymer
Underbalanced drilling
Viscosity

Keywords

  • Bubble coarsening
  • Coalescence
  • Foam quality
  • Foam stability
  • Gravity drainage
  • Half-life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Fuel Technology
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Stability of foams in pipe and annulus. / Govindu, Abhishek; Ahmed, Ramadan; Shah, Subhash; Amani, Mahmood.

In: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 180, 01.09.2019, p. 594-604.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Govindu, Abhishek ; Ahmed, Ramadan ; Shah, Subhash ; Amani, Mahmood. / Stability of foams in pipe and annulus. In: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2019 ; Vol. 180. pp. 594-604.
@article{d1ddf23e1c7f4ea48efd03645d2861b2,
title = "Stability of foams in pipe and annulus",
abstract = "Foam fluids present numerous advantages for many oil field applications. Due to their bubble structure and a gaseous component, foams exhibit very high viscosity and low density. Low density makes foam an attractive fluid in underbalanced drilling operation in which light fluid is essential to maintain wellbore pressure below pore pressure. Due to its high viscosity, foam exhibits good hole-cleaning performance even at low annular velocities. Nevertheless, foams are thermodynamically unstable fluids and their structures eventually collapse. Foam decays as a function of time and the decay occurs mainly due to bubble coalescence and the gravity drainage of the liquid phase. Maintaining fluid stability is necessary for foam drilling. For a successful drilling operation, the half-life of foam, which is the time taken by foam to drain 50{\%} of its liquid volume, should exceed circulation time. For other applications, such as hydraulic fracturing or cementing, the half-life of foam should exceed the time taken for fluid to reach target zones. In this study, foam stability experiments were conducted in a concentric annulus (50 mm × 75 mm) and 25-mm pipe sections. The pipe section was transparent to observe drained liquid level. Aqueous, polymer-based, and oil-based foams were considered in the investigation. The effect of gas volume fraction (quality) was studied under static condition. All experiments were performed at 400 kPa and ambient temperature (20 ± 2 °C). Foam quality was increased from 40{\%} to 80{\%}. However, at high qualities (greater than 70{\%}), the oil-based foam was unstable. Hydrostatic pressure data was collected from the annular section and converted into density curves to determine drained liquid volume. In the pipe section, the drainage was physically measured from the liquid level and recorded periodically. A digital camera with a microscope was used to capture foam image in real-time to examine bubble coarsening and foam decay. For a given quality, the polymer-based foam was the most stable, while oil-based foam was the least. For all three types of foams, stability increased with quality. Foams were more stable in the annular section, as compared to the pipe, possibly due to the impact of container wall on bubbles and drained liquid motion. Foam decay and bubble coarsening were observed by comparing bubble sizes in captured images at various times. On average, larger bubbles were observed in higher quality foams. The rate at which foam bubbles coarsening mostly reduced with time.",
keywords = "Bubble coarsening, Coalescence, Foam quality, Foam stability, Gravity drainage, Half-life",
author = "Abhishek Govindu and Ramadan Ahmed and Subhash Shah and Mahmood Amani",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.075",
language = "English",
volume = "180",
pages = "594--604",
journal = "Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering",
issn = "0920-4105",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stability of foams in pipe and annulus

AU - Govindu, Abhishek

AU - Ahmed, Ramadan

AU - Shah, Subhash

AU - Amani, Mahmood

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Foam fluids present numerous advantages for many oil field applications. Due to their bubble structure and a gaseous component, foams exhibit very high viscosity and low density. Low density makes foam an attractive fluid in underbalanced drilling operation in which light fluid is essential to maintain wellbore pressure below pore pressure. Due to its high viscosity, foam exhibits good hole-cleaning performance even at low annular velocities. Nevertheless, foams are thermodynamically unstable fluids and their structures eventually collapse. Foam decays as a function of time and the decay occurs mainly due to bubble coalescence and the gravity drainage of the liquid phase. Maintaining fluid stability is necessary for foam drilling. For a successful drilling operation, the half-life of foam, which is the time taken by foam to drain 50% of its liquid volume, should exceed circulation time. For other applications, such as hydraulic fracturing or cementing, the half-life of foam should exceed the time taken for fluid to reach target zones. In this study, foam stability experiments were conducted in a concentric annulus (50 mm × 75 mm) and 25-mm pipe sections. The pipe section was transparent to observe drained liquid level. Aqueous, polymer-based, and oil-based foams were considered in the investigation. The effect of gas volume fraction (quality) was studied under static condition. All experiments were performed at 400 kPa and ambient temperature (20 ± 2 °C). Foam quality was increased from 40% to 80%. However, at high qualities (greater than 70%), the oil-based foam was unstable. Hydrostatic pressure data was collected from the annular section and converted into density curves to determine drained liquid volume. In the pipe section, the drainage was physically measured from the liquid level and recorded periodically. A digital camera with a microscope was used to capture foam image in real-time to examine bubble coarsening and foam decay. For a given quality, the polymer-based foam was the most stable, while oil-based foam was the least. For all three types of foams, stability increased with quality. Foams were more stable in the annular section, as compared to the pipe, possibly due to the impact of container wall on bubbles and drained liquid motion. Foam decay and bubble coarsening were observed by comparing bubble sizes in captured images at various times. On average, larger bubbles were observed in higher quality foams. The rate at which foam bubbles coarsening mostly reduced with time.

AB - Foam fluids present numerous advantages for many oil field applications. Due to their bubble structure and a gaseous component, foams exhibit very high viscosity and low density. Low density makes foam an attractive fluid in underbalanced drilling operation in which light fluid is essential to maintain wellbore pressure below pore pressure. Due to its high viscosity, foam exhibits good hole-cleaning performance even at low annular velocities. Nevertheless, foams are thermodynamically unstable fluids and their structures eventually collapse. Foam decays as a function of time and the decay occurs mainly due to bubble coalescence and the gravity drainage of the liquid phase. Maintaining fluid stability is necessary for foam drilling. For a successful drilling operation, the half-life of foam, which is the time taken by foam to drain 50% of its liquid volume, should exceed circulation time. For other applications, such as hydraulic fracturing or cementing, the half-life of foam should exceed the time taken for fluid to reach target zones. In this study, foam stability experiments were conducted in a concentric annulus (50 mm × 75 mm) and 25-mm pipe sections. The pipe section was transparent to observe drained liquid level. Aqueous, polymer-based, and oil-based foams were considered in the investigation. The effect of gas volume fraction (quality) was studied under static condition. All experiments were performed at 400 kPa and ambient temperature (20 ± 2 °C). Foam quality was increased from 40% to 80%. However, at high qualities (greater than 70%), the oil-based foam was unstable. Hydrostatic pressure data was collected from the annular section and converted into density curves to determine drained liquid volume. In the pipe section, the drainage was physically measured from the liquid level and recorded periodically. A digital camera with a microscope was used to capture foam image in real-time to examine bubble coarsening and foam decay. For a given quality, the polymer-based foam was the most stable, while oil-based foam was the least. For all three types of foams, stability increased with quality. Foams were more stable in the annular section, as compared to the pipe, possibly due to the impact of container wall on bubbles and drained liquid motion. Foam decay and bubble coarsening were observed by comparing bubble sizes in captured images at various times. On average, larger bubbles were observed in higher quality foams. The rate at which foam bubbles coarsening mostly reduced with time.

KW - Bubble coarsening

KW - Coalescence

KW - Foam quality

KW - Foam stability

KW - Gravity drainage

KW - Half-life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066605222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066605222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.075

DO - 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.075

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066605222

VL - 180

SP - 594

EP - 604

JO - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

JF - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

SN - 0920-4105

ER -