Specimen Geometry Effect on the Deformation Mechanisms of Polypropylene-Based Composites Under Impact Loading at Different Temperatures

Kui Wang, N. Bahlouli, R. Matadi Boumbimba, F. Addiego, Y. Rémond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dynamic behaviors of polypropylene (PP), PP–ethylene propylene rubber (PP–EPR) and PP–nanoclay (PP–Nanocor) composites were studied by using split Hopkinson pressure bar at different temperatures and under different strain rates. Samples with two different geometries and with or without petroleum jelly lubricant were tested under identical testing conditions to compare the dynamic responses with underlying deformation mechanisms. For all the test temperatures and strain rates, the dynamic responses of neat PP and PP–Nanocor showed post-yield strain-softening, whereas those of PP–EPR showed strain-hardening after the yield point. PP–Nanocor showed more strain-softening compared with neat PP at room temperature due to the more important localized shearing deformation at the nanofiller/matrix interfaces. Friction between the sample and the bars affected the dynamic response of the materials at room temperature as well as high temperatures seen as differences in behavior between the dynamic behaviors of the non-lubricated thin samples and the non-lubricated thick samples under the same testing conditions. At room temperature and without lubrication, the thicker specimens of neat PP and PP–Nanocor failed during dynamic testing due to the barreling-induced crack that propagated in the specimen and led to the formation of a peripheral fragment. Although petroleum jelly provided a satisfactory lubrication condition for both neat PP and PP-based composites at room temperature and at high temperatures, by reducing the friction effect on the yield behavior, the lubrication did not have a significant effect on the post-yield behavior of neat PP and PP–Nanocor, particularly for the room temperature testing and with the thick specimens.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-111
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Polypropylenes
Geometry
Composite materials
Temperature
Petrolatum
Lubrication
Dynamic response
Rubber
Testing
Propylene
Strain rate
Crude oil
Friction
Barreling
Shearing
Strain hardening
Lubricants
Cracks

Keywords

  • Composites
  • Deformation mechanism
  • Impact
  • Polypropylene
  • Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Specimen Geometry Effect on the Deformation Mechanisms of Polypropylene-Based Composites Under Impact Loading at Different Temperatures. / Wang, Kui; Bahlouli, N.; Boumbimba, R. Matadi; Addiego, F.; Rémond, Y.

In: Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 101-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e674dc582b3a494bae7c70529cefc7e6,
title = "Specimen Geometry Effect on the Deformation Mechanisms of Polypropylene-Based Composites Under Impact Loading at Different Temperatures",
abstract = "Dynamic behaviors of polypropylene (PP), PP–ethylene propylene rubber (PP–EPR) and PP–nanoclay (PP–Nanocor) composites were studied by using split Hopkinson pressure bar at different temperatures and under different strain rates. Samples with two different geometries and with or without petroleum jelly lubricant were tested under identical testing conditions to compare the dynamic responses with underlying deformation mechanisms. For all the test temperatures and strain rates, the dynamic responses of neat PP and PP–Nanocor showed post-yield strain-softening, whereas those of PP–EPR showed strain-hardening after the yield point. PP–Nanocor showed more strain-softening compared with neat PP at room temperature due to the more important localized shearing deformation at the nanofiller/matrix interfaces. Friction between the sample and the bars affected the dynamic response of the materials at room temperature as well as high temperatures seen as differences in behavior between the dynamic behaviors of the non-lubricated thin samples and the non-lubricated thick samples under the same testing conditions. At room temperature and without lubrication, the thicker specimens of neat PP and PP–Nanocor failed during dynamic testing due to the barreling-induced crack that propagated in the specimen and led to the formation of a peripheral fragment. Although petroleum jelly provided a satisfactory lubrication condition for both neat PP and PP-based composites at room temperature and at high temperatures, by reducing the friction effect on the yield behavior, the lubrication did not have a significant effect on the post-yield behavior of neat PP and PP–Nanocor, particularly for the room temperature testing and with the thick specimens.",
keywords = "Composites, Deformation mechanism, Impact, Polypropylene, Temperature",
author = "Kui Wang and N. Bahlouli and Boumbimba, {R. Matadi} and F. Addiego and Y. R{\'e}mond",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40870-016-0049-3",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "101--111",
journal = "Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials",
issn = "2199-7446",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specimen Geometry Effect on the Deformation Mechanisms of Polypropylene-Based Composites Under Impact Loading at Different Temperatures

AU - Wang, Kui

AU - Bahlouli, N.

AU - Boumbimba, R. Matadi

AU - Addiego, F.

AU - Rémond, Y.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Dynamic behaviors of polypropylene (PP), PP–ethylene propylene rubber (PP–EPR) and PP–nanoclay (PP–Nanocor) composites were studied by using split Hopkinson pressure bar at different temperatures and under different strain rates. Samples with two different geometries and with or without petroleum jelly lubricant were tested under identical testing conditions to compare the dynamic responses with underlying deformation mechanisms. For all the test temperatures and strain rates, the dynamic responses of neat PP and PP–Nanocor showed post-yield strain-softening, whereas those of PP–EPR showed strain-hardening after the yield point. PP–Nanocor showed more strain-softening compared with neat PP at room temperature due to the more important localized shearing deformation at the nanofiller/matrix interfaces. Friction between the sample and the bars affected the dynamic response of the materials at room temperature as well as high temperatures seen as differences in behavior between the dynamic behaviors of the non-lubricated thin samples and the non-lubricated thick samples under the same testing conditions. At room temperature and without lubrication, the thicker specimens of neat PP and PP–Nanocor failed during dynamic testing due to the barreling-induced crack that propagated in the specimen and led to the formation of a peripheral fragment. Although petroleum jelly provided a satisfactory lubrication condition for both neat PP and PP-based composites at room temperature and at high temperatures, by reducing the friction effect on the yield behavior, the lubrication did not have a significant effect on the post-yield behavior of neat PP and PP–Nanocor, particularly for the room temperature testing and with the thick specimens.

AB - Dynamic behaviors of polypropylene (PP), PP–ethylene propylene rubber (PP–EPR) and PP–nanoclay (PP–Nanocor) composites were studied by using split Hopkinson pressure bar at different temperatures and under different strain rates. Samples with two different geometries and with or without petroleum jelly lubricant were tested under identical testing conditions to compare the dynamic responses with underlying deformation mechanisms. For all the test temperatures and strain rates, the dynamic responses of neat PP and PP–Nanocor showed post-yield strain-softening, whereas those of PP–EPR showed strain-hardening after the yield point. PP–Nanocor showed more strain-softening compared with neat PP at room temperature due to the more important localized shearing deformation at the nanofiller/matrix interfaces. Friction between the sample and the bars affected the dynamic response of the materials at room temperature as well as high temperatures seen as differences in behavior between the dynamic behaviors of the non-lubricated thin samples and the non-lubricated thick samples under the same testing conditions. At room temperature and without lubrication, the thicker specimens of neat PP and PP–Nanocor failed during dynamic testing due to the barreling-induced crack that propagated in the specimen and led to the formation of a peripheral fragment. Although petroleum jelly provided a satisfactory lubrication condition for both neat PP and PP-based composites at room temperature and at high temperatures, by reducing the friction effect on the yield behavior, the lubrication did not have a significant effect on the post-yield behavior of neat PP and PP–Nanocor, particularly for the room temperature testing and with the thick specimens.

KW - Composites

KW - Deformation mechanism

KW - Impact

KW - Polypropylene

KW - Temperature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031401219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031401219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40870-016-0049-3

DO - 10.1007/s40870-016-0049-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85031401219

VL - 2

SP - 101

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials

JF - Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials

SN - 2199-7446

IS - 1

ER -