Smart marketing or bait & switch? Competitors' brands as keywords in online advertising

Mark A. Rosso, Bernard Jansen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The business models of major Internet search engines depend on online advertising, primarily in the form of search engine keyword advertising. In recent years, a controversy surrounding keyword advertising has gained notoriety worldwide, in both the international court systems and the media. It concerns a form of potential "bait and switch" advertising where a consumer, searching using the brand name of one company, is presented with an advertisement by a competitor of the searched-for brand. Sometimes, this competitor's ad copy contains the name of the searched for brand as well. This practice has been referred to as "piggybacking". Given the particular need for consumer trust in ecommerce, one might question the overall value of piggybacking. In the U.S. in particular, the legality of this practice, and the potential liability of the search engines for contributing to trademark infringement, is unclear. However, the eventual resolutions of the issue by the U.S. and international courts could significantly and negatively impact the business model of Internet search engines. In this paper, the actual prevalence of piggybacking of major brands in U.S. search engines is investigated. One hundred search queries consisting solely of one of the 100 top global brand names were submitted to three major search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft's. Analysis of 8,345 results from the search engine results pages showed only 4 percent of sponsored ads triggered by competitors' trademarked terms. There was even lower use of trademark terms in ads by competitors. Thus, competitive piggybacking does not appear to be a widespread phenomenon. Possible explanations for this are discussed, and suggestions for future research are given.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10
Pages27-34
Number of pages8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes
Event4th Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web, WICOW'10 - Raleigh, NC
Duration: 26 Apr 201030 Apr 2010

Other

Other4th Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web, WICOW'10
CityRaleigh, NC
Period26/4/1030/4/10

Fingerprint

Search engines
Marketing
Switches
Trademarks
Internet
Industry

Keywords

  • brand
  • deceptive advertising
  • e-commerce
  • intellectual property
  • internet advertising
  • keyword advertising
  • marketing
  • paid placement
  • paid search
  • passing off
  • pay per click
  • search advertising
  • search engine
  • search engine marketing
  • sponsored search
  • trademark
  • trademark infringement
  • trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cite this

Rosso, M. A., & Jansen, B. (2010). Smart marketing or bait & switch? Competitors' brands as keywords in online advertising. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10 (pp. 27-34) https://doi.org/10.1145/1772938.1772946

Smart marketing or bait & switch? Competitors' brands as keywords in online advertising. / Rosso, Mark A.; Jansen, Bernard.

Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10. 2010. p. 27-34.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Rosso, MA & Jansen, B 2010, Smart marketing or bait & switch? Competitors' brands as keywords in online advertising. in Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10. pp. 27-34, 4th Workshop on Information Credibility on the Web, WICOW'10, Raleigh, NC, 26/4/10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772938.1772946
Rosso MA, Jansen B. Smart marketing or bait & switch? Competitors' brands as keywords in online advertising. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10. 2010. p. 27-34 https://doi.org/10.1145/1772938.1772946
Rosso, Mark A. ; Jansen, Bernard. / Smart marketing or bait & switch? Competitors' brands as keywords in online advertising. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10. 2010. pp. 27-34
@inproceedings{5aeeddb905b34e3c837d186b0404187d,
title = "Smart marketing or bait & switch? Competitors' brands as keywords in online advertising",
abstract = "The business models of major Internet search engines depend on online advertising, primarily in the form of search engine keyword advertising. In recent years, a controversy surrounding keyword advertising has gained notoriety worldwide, in both the international court systems and the media. It concerns a form of potential {"}bait and switch{"} advertising where a consumer, searching using the brand name of one company, is presented with an advertisement by a competitor of the searched-for brand. Sometimes, this competitor's ad copy contains the name of the searched for brand as well. This practice has been referred to as {"}piggybacking{"}. Given the particular need for consumer trust in ecommerce, one might question the overall value of piggybacking. In the U.S. in particular, the legality of this practice, and the potential liability of the search engines for contributing to trademark infringement, is unclear. However, the eventual resolutions of the issue by the U.S. and international courts could significantly and negatively impact the business model of Internet search engines. In this paper, the actual prevalence of piggybacking of major brands in U.S. search engines is investigated. One hundred search queries consisting solely of one of the 100 top global brand names were submitted to three major search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft's. Analysis of 8,345 results from the search engine results pages showed only 4 percent of sponsored ads triggered by competitors' trademarked terms. There was even lower use of trademark terms in ads by competitors. Thus, competitive piggybacking does not appear to be a widespread phenomenon. Possible explanations for this are discussed, and suggestions for future research are given.",
keywords = "brand, deceptive advertising, e-commerce, intellectual property, internet advertising, keyword advertising, marketing, paid placement, paid search, passing off, pay per click, search advertising, search engine, search engine marketing, sponsored search, trademark, trademark infringement, trust",
author = "Rosso, {Mark A.} and Bernard Jansen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1145/1772938.1772946",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781605589404",
pages = "27--34",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Smart marketing or bait & switch? Competitors' brands as keywords in online advertising

AU - Rosso, Mark A.

AU - Jansen, Bernard

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The business models of major Internet search engines depend on online advertising, primarily in the form of search engine keyword advertising. In recent years, a controversy surrounding keyword advertising has gained notoriety worldwide, in both the international court systems and the media. It concerns a form of potential "bait and switch" advertising where a consumer, searching using the brand name of one company, is presented with an advertisement by a competitor of the searched-for brand. Sometimes, this competitor's ad copy contains the name of the searched for brand as well. This practice has been referred to as "piggybacking". Given the particular need for consumer trust in ecommerce, one might question the overall value of piggybacking. In the U.S. in particular, the legality of this practice, and the potential liability of the search engines for contributing to trademark infringement, is unclear. However, the eventual resolutions of the issue by the U.S. and international courts could significantly and negatively impact the business model of Internet search engines. In this paper, the actual prevalence of piggybacking of major brands in U.S. search engines is investigated. One hundred search queries consisting solely of one of the 100 top global brand names were submitted to three major search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft's. Analysis of 8,345 results from the search engine results pages showed only 4 percent of sponsored ads triggered by competitors' trademarked terms. There was even lower use of trademark terms in ads by competitors. Thus, competitive piggybacking does not appear to be a widespread phenomenon. Possible explanations for this are discussed, and suggestions for future research are given.

AB - The business models of major Internet search engines depend on online advertising, primarily in the form of search engine keyword advertising. In recent years, a controversy surrounding keyword advertising has gained notoriety worldwide, in both the international court systems and the media. It concerns a form of potential "bait and switch" advertising where a consumer, searching using the brand name of one company, is presented with an advertisement by a competitor of the searched-for brand. Sometimes, this competitor's ad copy contains the name of the searched for brand as well. This practice has been referred to as "piggybacking". Given the particular need for consumer trust in ecommerce, one might question the overall value of piggybacking. In the U.S. in particular, the legality of this practice, and the potential liability of the search engines for contributing to trademark infringement, is unclear. However, the eventual resolutions of the issue by the U.S. and international courts could significantly and negatively impact the business model of Internet search engines. In this paper, the actual prevalence of piggybacking of major brands in U.S. search engines is investigated. One hundred search queries consisting solely of one of the 100 top global brand names were submitted to three major search engines, Google, Yahoo!, and Microsoft's. Analysis of 8,345 results from the search engine results pages showed only 4 percent of sponsored ads triggered by competitors' trademarked terms. There was even lower use of trademark terms in ads by competitors. Thus, competitive piggybacking does not appear to be a widespread phenomenon. Possible explanations for this are discussed, and suggestions for future research are given.

KW - brand

KW - deceptive advertising

KW - e-commerce

KW - intellectual property

KW - internet advertising

KW - keyword advertising

KW - marketing

KW - paid placement

KW - paid search

KW - passing off

KW - pay per click

KW - search advertising

KW - search engine

KW - search engine marketing

KW - sponsored search

KW - trademark

KW - trademark infringement

KW - trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954615895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954615895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1772938.1772946

DO - 10.1145/1772938.1772946

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781605589404

SP - 27

EP - 34

BT - Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Information Credibility, WICOW '10

ER -