Single versus multi-hop wireless reprogramming in sensor networks

Rajesh Panta, Saurabh Bagchi, Issa Khalil, Luis Montestruque

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wireless reprogramming of the sensor network is useful for uploading new code or for changing the functionality of the existing code. In recent years, the research focus has shifted from single hop reprogramming to multi-hop reprogramming primarily because of its ease of use. Practical experience from a multi-hop sensor network for monitoring water pollution, called CSOnet, deployed in South Bend, IN, indicates that single-hop reprogramming may be preferable under certain conditions to minimize reprogramming time and energy. In this, the user gets close to a node to be reprogrammed and wirelessly reprograms a single node at a time. The choice between single hop and multi-hop reprogramming depends on factors like network size, node density and most importantly, link reliabilities. We present a protocol called DStream having both single and multi-hop reprogramming capabilities. We provide mathematical analysis and results from testbed experiments and simulations to give insights into the choice of the two reprogramming methods.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTRIDENTCOM 2008 - 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities
PublisherICST
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes
Event4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, TRIDENTCOM 2008 - Innsbruck, Austria
Duration: 17 Mar 200820 Mar 2008

Other

Other4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, TRIDENTCOM 2008
CountryAustria
CityInnsbruck
Period17/3/0820/3/08

Fingerprint

Sensor networks
Water pollution
Testbeds
Network protocols
Monitoring
Experiments

Keywords

  • Link reliability
  • Multi-hop reprogramming
  • Sensor networks
  • Single hop reprogramming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems

Cite this

Panta, R., Bagchi, S., Khalil, I., & Montestruque, L. (2008). Single versus multi-hop wireless reprogramming in sensor networks. In TRIDENTCOM 2008 - 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities ICST. https://doi.org/10.4108/tridentcom.2008.3134

Single versus multi-hop wireless reprogramming in sensor networks. / Panta, Rajesh; Bagchi, Saurabh; Khalil, Issa; Montestruque, Luis.

TRIDENTCOM 2008 - 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities. ICST, 2008.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Panta, R, Bagchi, S, Khalil, I & Montestruque, L 2008, Single versus multi-hop wireless reprogramming in sensor networks. in TRIDENTCOM 2008 - 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities. ICST, 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, TRIDENTCOM 2008, Innsbruck, Austria, 17/3/08. https://doi.org/10.4108/tridentcom.2008.3134
Panta R, Bagchi S, Khalil I, Montestruque L. Single versus multi-hop wireless reprogramming in sensor networks. In TRIDENTCOM 2008 - 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities. ICST. 2008 https://doi.org/10.4108/tridentcom.2008.3134
Panta, Rajesh ; Bagchi, Saurabh ; Khalil, Issa ; Montestruque, Luis. / Single versus multi-hop wireless reprogramming in sensor networks. TRIDENTCOM 2008 - 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities. ICST, 2008.
@inproceedings{e8226caa28914afdb8af56179c67ee54,
title = "Single versus multi-hop wireless reprogramming in sensor networks",
abstract = "Wireless reprogramming of the sensor network is useful for uploading new code or for changing the functionality of the existing code. In recent years, the research focus has shifted from single hop reprogramming to multi-hop reprogramming primarily because of its ease of use. Practical experience from a multi-hop sensor network for monitoring water pollution, called CSOnet, deployed in South Bend, IN, indicates that single-hop reprogramming may be preferable under certain conditions to minimize reprogramming time and energy. In this, the user gets close to a node to be reprogrammed and wirelessly reprograms a single node at a time. The choice between single hop and multi-hop reprogramming depends on factors like network size, node density and most importantly, link reliabilities. We present a protocol called DStream having both single and multi-hop reprogramming capabilities. We provide mathematical analysis and results from testbed experiments and simulations to give insights into the choice of the two reprogramming methods.",
keywords = "Link reliability, Multi-hop reprogramming, Sensor networks, Single hop reprogramming",
author = "Rajesh Panta and Saurabh Bagchi and Issa Khalil and Luis Montestruque",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4108/tridentcom.2008.3134",
language = "English",
booktitle = "TRIDENTCOM 2008 - 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities",
publisher = "ICST",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Single versus multi-hop wireless reprogramming in sensor networks

AU - Panta, Rajesh

AU - Bagchi, Saurabh

AU - Khalil, Issa

AU - Montestruque, Luis

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Wireless reprogramming of the sensor network is useful for uploading new code or for changing the functionality of the existing code. In recent years, the research focus has shifted from single hop reprogramming to multi-hop reprogramming primarily because of its ease of use. Practical experience from a multi-hop sensor network for monitoring water pollution, called CSOnet, deployed in South Bend, IN, indicates that single-hop reprogramming may be preferable under certain conditions to minimize reprogramming time and energy. In this, the user gets close to a node to be reprogrammed and wirelessly reprograms a single node at a time. The choice between single hop and multi-hop reprogramming depends on factors like network size, node density and most importantly, link reliabilities. We present a protocol called DStream having both single and multi-hop reprogramming capabilities. We provide mathematical analysis and results from testbed experiments and simulations to give insights into the choice of the two reprogramming methods.

AB - Wireless reprogramming of the sensor network is useful for uploading new code or for changing the functionality of the existing code. In recent years, the research focus has shifted from single hop reprogramming to multi-hop reprogramming primarily because of its ease of use. Practical experience from a multi-hop sensor network for monitoring water pollution, called CSOnet, deployed in South Bend, IN, indicates that single-hop reprogramming may be preferable under certain conditions to minimize reprogramming time and energy. In this, the user gets close to a node to be reprogrammed and wirelessly reprograms a single node at a time. The choice between single hop and multi-hop reprogramming depends on factors like network size, node density and most importantly, link reliabilities. We present a protocol called DStream having both single and multi-hop reprogramming capabilities. We provide mathematical analysis and results from testbed experiments and simulations to give insights into the choice of the two reprogramming methods.

KW - Link reliability

KW - Multi-hop reprogramming

KW - Sensor networks

KW - Single hop reprogramming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898667030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898667030&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4108/tridentcom.2008.3134

DO - 10.4108/tridentcom.2008.3134

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - TRIDENTCOM 2008 - 4th International ICST Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities

PB - ICST

ER -