Single-Stage Three-Phase Differential-Mode Buck-Boost Inverters with Continuous Input Current for PV Applications

Ahmed Darwish, Ahmed M. Massoud, Derrick Holliday, Shehab Ahmed, B. W. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Differential-mode buck-boost inverters have merits such as reduced switch number, ability to provide voltages higher or lower than the input voltage magnitude, improved efficiency, reduced cost and size, and increased power density, especially in low-power applications. There are five buck-boost inverters that can provide flexible output voltage without the need of a large electrolytic input side capacitor, which degrades the reliability of inverters. The continuous input current of these inverters is appropriate for maximum power point tracking operation in photovoltaic and fuel cells applications. Three of the five inverters can be isolated with high-frequency-link transformers where the common-mode leakage current can be mitigated. However, the performance and control of such converters have not been discussed in detail. In this paper, the five possible single-stage three-phase differential-mode buck-boost inverters with continuous input current are investigated and compared in terms of total losses, maximum ripple current, total harmonic distortion, and device and passive element ratings. In addition, the possible methods are presented for eliminating the input third-order harmonic current, resulting from the stored energy in the passive elements, as well as the output second-order harmonic currents. The ability for isolating the input and output sides of the inverters with a small-high frequency transformers is discussed. A changeable-terminal 2.5-kW bidirectional inverter is used to validate the design flexibility of the inverter topologies, when digital signal processor-controlled.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7377101
Pages (from-to)8218-8236
Number of pages19
JournalIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
Volume31
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Electric potential
High frequency transformers
Photovoltaic cells
Harmonic distortion
Digital signal processors
Leakage currents
Fuel cells
Capacitors
Switches
Topology
Costs

Keywords

  • Buck-boost inverter
  • Cuk converter
  • DC-DC converters
  • high-frequency transformers
  • SEPIC converter
  • sliding mode control
  • state-space averaging
  • switched mode power supply

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Single-Stage Three-Phase Differential-Mode Buck-Boost Inverters with Continuous Input Current for PV Applications. / Darwish, Ahmed; Massoud, Ahmed M.; Holliday, Derrick; Ahmed, Shehab; Williams, B. W.

In: IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 31, No. 12, 7377101, 01.12.2016, p. 8218-8236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Darwish, Ahmed ; Massoud, Ahmed M. ; Holliday, Derrick ; Ahmed, Shehab ; Williams, B. W. / Single-Stage Three-Phase Differential-Mode Buck-Boost Inverters with Continuous Input Current for PV Applications. In: IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 12. pp. 8218-8236.
@article{3c84056727ed4225936b499bbd1afa4d,
title = "Single-Stage Three-Phase Differential-Mode Buck-Boost Inverters with Continuous Input Current for PV Applications",
abstract = "Differential-mode buck-boost inverters have merits such as reduced switch number, ability to provide voltages higher or lower than the input voltage magnitude, improved efficiency, reduced cost and size, and increased power density, especially in low-power applications. There are five buck-boost inverters that can provide flexible output voltage without the need of a large electrolytic input side capacitor, which degrades the reliability of inverters. The continuous input current of these inverters is appropriate for maximum power point tracking operation in photovoltaic and fuel cells applications. Three of the five inverters can be isolated with high-frequency-link transformers where the common-mode leakage current can be mitigated. However, the performance and control of such converters have not been discussed in detail. In this paper, the five possible single-stage three-phase differential-mode buck-boost inverters with continuous input current are investigated and compared in terms of total losses, maximum ripple current, total harmonic distortion, and device and passive element ratings. In addition, the possible methods are presented for eliminating the input third-order harmonic current, resulting from the stored energy in the passive elements, as well as the output second-order harmonic currents. The ability for isolating the input and output sides of the inverters with a small-high frequency transformers is discussed. A changeable-terminal 2.5-kW bidirectional inverter is used to validate the design flexibility of the inverter topologies, when digital signal processor-controlled.",
keywords = "Buck-boost inverter, Cuk converter, DC-DC converters, high-frequency transformers, SEPIC converter, sliding mode control, state-space averaging, switched mode power supply",
author = "Ahmed Darwish and Massoud, {Ahmed M.} and Derrick Holliday and Shehab Ahmed and Williams, {B. W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TPEL.2016.2516255",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "8218--8236",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics",
issn = "0885-8993",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-Stage Three-Phase Differential-Mode Buck-Boost Inverters with Continuous Input Current for PV Applications

AU - Darwish, Ahmed

AU - Massoud, Ahmed M.

AU - Holliday, Derrick

AU - Ahmed, Shehab

AU - Williams, B. W.

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - Differential-mode buck-boost inverters have merits such as reduced switch number, ability to provide voltages higher or lower than the input voltage magnitude, improved efficiency, reduced cost and size, and increased power density, especially in low-power applications. There are five buck-boost inverters that can provide flexible output voltage without the need of a large electrolytic input side capacitor, which degrades the reliability of inverters. The continuous input current of these inverters is appropriate for maximum power point tracking operation in photovoltaic and fuel cells applications. Three of the five inverters can be isolated with high-frequency-link transformers where the common-mode leakage current can be mitigated. However, the performance and control of such converters have not been discussed in detail. In this paper, the five possible single-stage three-phase differential-mode buck-boost inverters with continuous input current are investigated and compared in terms of total losses, maximum ripple current, total harmonic distortion, and device and passive element ratings. In addition, the possible methods are presented for eliminating the input third-order harmonic current, resulting from the stored energy in the passive elements, as well as the output second-order harmonic currents. The ability for isolating the input and output sides of the inverters with a small-high frequency transformers is discussed. A changeable-terminal 2.5-kW bidirectional inverter is used to validate the design flexibility of the inverter topologies, when digital signal processor-controlled.

AB - Differential-mode buck-boost inverters have merits such as reduced switch number, ability to provide voltages higher or lower than the input voltage magnitude, improved efficiency, reduced cost and size, and increased power density, especially in low-power applications. There are five buck-boost inverters that can provide flexible output voltage without the need of a large electrolytic input side capacitor, which degrades the reliability of inverters. The continuous input current of these inverters is appropriate for maximum power point tracking operation in photovoltaic and fuel cells applications. Three of the five inverters can be isolated with high-frequency-link transformers where the common-mode leakage current can be mitigated. However, the performance and control of such converters have not been discussed in detail. In this paper, the five possible single-stage three-phase differential-mode buck-boost inverters with continuous input current are investigated and compared in terms of total losses, maximum ripple current, total harmonic distortion, and device and passive element ratings. In addition, the possible methods are presented for eliminating the input third-order harmonic current, resulting from the stored energy in the passive elements, as well as the output second-order harmonic currents. The ability for isolating the input and output sides of the inverters with a small-high frequency transformers is discussed. A changeable-terminal 2.5-kW bidirectional inverter is used to validate the design flexibility of the inverter topologies, when digital signal processor-controlled.

KW - Buck-boost inverter

KW - Cuk converter

KW - DC-DC converters

KW - high-frequency transformers

KW - SEPIC converter

KW - sliding mode control

KW - state-space averaging

KW - switched mode power supply

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978732519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978732519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2516255

DO - 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2516255

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 8218

EP - 8236

JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics

SN - 0885-8993

IS - 12

M1 - 7377101

ER -