Single Cylinder GTL ENGINE

An Experimental Comparison between Traditional Diesel and GTL Diesel on Single Cylinder Engine

Muzammil Khan, Reza Tafreshi, Ahmad J. Mokahal, Mohamed Tarek Mohamed, Mohab Yasser Hanbal, Jayson Elturk

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two different types of fuel sources, namely conventional diesel and GTL diesel, were used to conduct a study of their effects on engine emissions and performance. Varying loads were applied to obtain concise data when contrasting the aforementioned fuels. Key parameters such as net power output, torque, engine speed and efficiency were measured. The engine and the dynamometer were operated via an automated closed-loop control system. On-road study found that the volumetric fuel consumption of GTL diesel was higher by up to 3.3% when compared to conventional diesel; there were drastic reductions in the levels of regulated emissions when using GTL by 36% for CO, 4.2% for CO2, 47% for THC (total hydrocarbons) and 35% for NOx, compared to conventional diesel.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition
PublisherSAE International
Volume2016-April
EditionApril
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2016
EventSAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition - Detroit, United States
Duration: 12 Apr 201614 Apr 2016

Other

OtherSAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition
CountryUnited States
CityDetroit
Period12/4/1614/4/16

Fingerprint

Engine cylinders
Engines
Closed loop control systems
Dynamometers
Fuel consumption
Torque
Hydrocarbons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Pollution
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Khan, M., Tafreshi, R., Mokahal, A. J., Mohamed, M. T., Hanbal, M. Y., & Elturk, J. (2016). Single Cylinder GTL ENGINE: An Experimental Comparison between Traditional Diesel and GTL Diesel on Single Cylinder Engine. In SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition (April ed., Vol. 2016-April). SAE International. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1262

Single Cylinder GTL ENGINE : An Experimental Comparison between Traditional Diesel and GTL Diesel on Single Cylinder Engine. / Khan, Muzammil; Tafreshi, Reza; Mokahal, Ahmad J.; Mohamed, Mohamed Tarek; Hanbal, Mohab Yasser; Elturk, Jayson.

SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition. Vol. 2016-April April. ed. SAE International, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Khan, M, Tafreshi, R, Mokahal, AJ, Mohamed, MT, Hanbal, MY & Elturk, J 2016, Single Cylinder GTL ENGINE: An Experimental Comparison between Traditional Diesel and GTL Diesel on Single Cylinder Engine. in SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition. April edn, vol. 2016-April, SAE International, SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition, Detroit, United States, 12/4/16. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1262
Khan M, Tafreshi R, Mokahal AJ, Mohamed MT, Hanbal MY, Elturk J. Single Cylinder GTL ENGINE: An Experimental Comparison between Traditional Diesel and GTL Diesel on Single Cylinder Engine. In SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition. April ed. Vol. 2016-April. SAE International. 2016 https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1262
Khan, Muzammil ; Tafreshi, Reza ; Mokahal, Ahmad J. ; Mohamed, Mohamed Tarek ; Hanbal, Mohab Yasser ; Elturk, Jayson. / Single Cylinder GTL ENGINE : An Experimental Comparison between Traditional Diesel and GTL Diesel on Single Cylinder Engine. SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition. Vol. 2016-April April. ed. SAE International, 2016.
@inproceedings{4689737f3b0244bab5b1c7aabbb8ca39,
title = "Single Cylinder GTL ENGINE: An Experimental Comparison between Traditional Diesel and GTL Diesel on Single Cylinder Engine",
abstract = "Two different types of fuel sources, namely conventional diesel and GTL diesel, were used to conduct a study of their effects on engine emissions and performance. Varying loads were applied to obtain concise data when contrasting the aforementioned fuels. Key parameters such as net power output, torque, engine speed and efficiency were measured. The engine and the dynamometer were operated via an automated closed-loop control system. On-road study found that the volumetric fuel consumption of GTL diesel was higher by up to 3.3{\%} when compared to conventional diesel; there were drastic reductions in the levels of regulated emissions when using GTL by 36{\%} for CO, 4.2{\%} for CO2, 47{\%} for THC (total hydrocarbons) and 35{\%} for NOx, compared to conventional diesel.",
author = "Muzammil Khan and Reza Tafreshi and Mokahal, {Ahmad J.} and Mohamed, {Mohamed Tarek} and Hanbal, {Mohab Yasser} and Jayson Elturk",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "5",
doi = "10.4271/2016-01-1262",
language = "English",
volume = "2016-April",
booktitle = "SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition",
publisher = "SAE International",
address = "United States",
edition = "April",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Single Cylinder GTL ENGINE

T2 - An Experimental Comparison between Traditional Diesel and GTL Diesel on Single Cylinder Engine

AU - Khan, Muzammil

AU - Tafreshi, Reza

AU - Mokahal, Ahmad J.

AU - Mohamed, Mohamed Tarek

AU - Hanbal, Mohab Yasser

AU - Elturk, Jayson

PY - 2016/4/5

Y1 - 2016/4/5

N2 - Two different types of fuel sources, namely conventional diesel and GTL diesel, were used to conduct a study of their effects on engine emissions and performance. Varying loads were applied to obtain concise data when contrasting the aforementioned fuels. Key parameters such as net power output, torque, engine speed and efficiency were measured. The engine and the dynamometer were operated via an automated closed-loop control system. On-road study found that the volumetric fuel consumption of GTL diesel was higher by up to 3.3% when compared to conventional diesel; there were drastic reductions in the levels of regulated emissions when using GTL by 36% for CO, 4.2% for CO2, 47% for THC (total hydrocarbons) and 35% for NOx, compared to conventional diesel.

AB - Two different types of fuel sources, namely conventional diesel and GTL diesel, were used to conduct a study of their effects on engine emissions and performance. Varying loads were applied to obtain concise data when contrasting the aforementioned fuels. Key parameters such as net power output, torque, engine speed and efficiency were measured. The engine and the dynamometer were operated via an automated closed-loop control system. On-road study found that the volumetric fuel consumption of GTL diesel was higher by up to 3.3% when compared to conventional diesel; there were drastic reductions in the levels of regulated emissions when using GTL by 36% for CO, 4.2% for CO2, 47% for THC (total hydrocarbons) and 35% for NOx, compared to conventional diesel.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975263396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975263396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4271/2016-01-1262

DO - 10.4271/2016-01-1262

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2016-April

BT - SAE 2016 World Congress and Exhibition

PB - SAE International

ER -