Round Robin vent sizing exercise on a gassy system

40% dicumyl peroxide in butyrate solvent

Luc Vechot, Jake Kay, Jill Wilday, Douglas Carson, Jean Pierre Bigot

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A Round Robin test was set up to obtain a cross comparison of participant's methods regarding a typical pressure relief device (bursting disc) sizing problem. The problem in question was a 'gassy' runaway reaction system: decomposition of 40% w/w dicumyl peroxide in 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate. The objective of the Round Robin exercise was to highlight the disparities in the participant's approaches and identify barriers and research needs. Two broad methods were used: one was the implementation of the DIERS method; the other was to follow a similarity or scale-up approach. The scale-up approach consists experimentally determining a minimum safe vent area and scaling up maintaining the vent area/volume ratio. This approach is similar to the one adopted by the UN committee on the Transport of Dangerous Goods for vent sizing of peroxide tankers using a 10 litre vessel. Very different results in terms of vent area were obtained from the seven participants. Analysis of the vent sizing calculations based on calorimetric data showed that the experimental conditions and their interpretation can significantly influence the estimated gas production rate and therefore the final vent area. However, the calculation of the vented mass flux stays largely responsible for the differences in calculated vent area. The critical factor lies in the assumption of single-phase (gas only) venting or two-phase (liquid and gas) venting. The reasons for assuming single-phase venting, which gives a lower vent area, are unclear and may not be justified. The comparison showed that the calorimetric and the similarity approaches diverged significantly when two-phase only venting was assumed. The Round Robin test highlighted the need for more experimental and modelling work towards predicting the nature of the vented fluid at large scale, and in the use of adiabatic calorimetry to determine the maximum gas production rate. Large-scale tests would allow the comparison, the validation and the improvement of the calorimetric and similarity approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011, HAZARDS 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection
PublisherInstitution of Chemical Engineers
Pages278-286
Number of pages9
Edition156
ISBN (Print)9781622767892
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Event22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection, HAZARDS 2011 - Liverpool, United Kingdom
Duration: 11 Apr 201114 Apr 2011

Other

Other22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection, HAZARDS 2011
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLiverpool
Period11/4/1114/4/11

Fingerprint

Butyrates
Vents
Peroxides
Gases
Rupture disks
dicumyl peroxide
Calorimetry
Mass transfer
Decomposition
Fluids
Liquids

Keywords

  • Adiabatic calorimetry
  • Dicumyl peroxide
  • Pressure relief systems
  • Reaction kinetics
  • Runaway reaction
  • UN method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemical Engineering(all)

Cite this

Vechot, L., Kay, J., Wilday, J., Carson, D., & Bigot, J. P. (2011). Round Robin vent sizing exercise on a gassy system: 40% dicumyl peroxide in butyrate solvent. In 22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011, HAZARDS 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection (156 ed., pp. 278-286). Institution of Chemical Engineers.

Round Robin vent sizing exercise on a gassy system : 40% dicumyl peroxide in butyrate solvent. / Vechot, Luc; Kay, Jake; Wilday, Jill; Carson, Douglas; Bigot, Jean Pierre.

22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011, HAZARDS 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 156. ed. Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2011. p. 278-286.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Vechot, L, Kay, J, Wilday, J, Carson, D & Bigot, JP 2011, Round Robin vent sizing exercise on a gassy system: 40% dicumyl peroxide in butyrate solvent. in 22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011, HAZARDS 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 156 edn, Institution of Chemical Engineers, pp. 278-286, 22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection, HAZARDS 2011, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 11/4/11.
Vechot L, Kay J, Wilday J, Carson D, Bigot JP. Round Robin vent sizing exercise on a gassy system: 40% dicumyl peroxide in butyrate solvent. In 22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011, HAZARDS 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 156 ed. Institution of Chemical Engineers. 2011. p. 278-286
Vechot, Luc ; Kay, Jake ; Wilday, Jill ; Carson, Douglas ; Bigot, Jean Pierre. / Round Robin vent sizing exercise on a gassy system : 40% dicumyl peroxide in butyrate solvent. 22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011, HAZARDS 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 156. ed. Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2011. pp. 278-286
@inproceedings{c11d238f9e8d4ca6a00c49efc466e986,
title = "Round Robin vent sizing exercise on a gassy system: 40{\%} dicumyl peroxide in butyrate solvent",
abstract = "A Round Robin test was set up to obtain a cross comparison of participant's methods regarding a typical pressure relief device (bursting disc) sizing problem. The problem in question was a 'gassy' runaway reaction system: decomposition of 40{\%} w/w dicumyl peroxide in 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate. The objective of the Round Robin exercise was to highlight the disparities in the participant's approaches and identify barriers and research needs. Two broad methods were used: one was the implementation of the DIERS method; the other was to follow a similarity or scale-up approach. The scale-up approach consists experimentally determining a minimum safe vent area and scaling up maintaining the vent area/volume ratio. This approach is similar to the one adopted by the UN committee on the Transport of Dangerous Goods for vent sizing of peroxide tankers using a 10 litre vessel. Very different results in terms of vent area were obtained from the seven participants. Analysis of the vent sizing calculations based on calorimetric data showed that the experimental conditions and their interpretation can significantly influence the estimated gas production rate and therefore the final vent area. However, the calculation of the vented mass flux stays largely responsible for the differences in calculated vent area. The critical factor lies in the assumption of single-phase (gas only) venting or two-phase (liquid and gas) venting. The reasons for assuming single-phase venting, which gives a lower vent area, are unclear and may not be justified. The comparison showed that the calorimetric and the similarity approaches diverged significantly when two-phase only venting was assumed. The Round Robin test highlighted the need for more experimental and modelling work towards predicting the nature of the vented fluid at large scale, and in the use of adiabatic calorimetry to determine the maximum gas production rate. Large-scale tests would allow the comparison, the validation and the improvement of the calorimetric and similarity approaches.",
keywords = "Adiabatic calorimetry, Dicumyl peroxide, Pressure relief systems, Reaction kinetics, Runaway reaction, UN method",
author = "Luc Vechot and Jake Kay and Jill Wilday and Douglas Carson and Bigot, {Jean Pierre}",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781622767892",
pages = "278--286",
booktitle = "22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011, HAZARDS 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection",
publisher = "Institution of Chemical Engineers",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "156",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Round Robin vent sizing exercise on a gassy system

T2 - 40% dicumyl peroxide in butyrate solvent

AU - Vechot, Luc

AU - Kay, Jake

AU - Wilday, Jill

AU - Carson, Douglas

AU - Bigot, Jean Pierre

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - A Round Robin test was set up to obtain a cross comparison of participant's methods regarding a typical pressure relief device (bursting disc) sizing problem. The problem in question was a 'gassy' runaway reaction system: decomposition of 40% w/w dicumyl peroxide in 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate. The objective of the Round Robin exercise was to highlight the disparities in the participant's approaches and identify barriers and research needs. Two broad methods were used: one was the implementation of the DIERS method; the other was to follow a similarity or scale-up approach. The scale-up approach consists experimentally determining a minimum safe vent area and scaling up maintaining the vent area/volume ratio. This approach is similar to the one adopted by the UN committee on the Transport of Dangerous Goods for vent sizing of peroxide tankers using a 10 litre vessel. Very different results in terms of vent area were obtained from the seven participants. Analysis of the vent sizing calculations based on calorimetric data showed that the experimental conditions and their interpretation can significantly influence the estimated gas production rate and therefore the final vent area. However, the calculation of the vented mass flux stays largely responsible for the differences in calculated vent area. The critical factor lies in the assumption of single-phase (gas only) venting or two-phase (liquid and gas) venting. The reasons for assuming single-phase venting, which gives a lower vent area, are unclear and may not be justified. The comparison showed that the calorimetric and the similarity approaches diverged significantly when two-phase only venting was assumed. The Round Robin test highlighted the need for more experimental and modelling work towards predicting the nature of the vented fluid at large scale, and in the use of adiabatic calorimetry to determine the maximum gas production rate. Large-scale tests would allow the comparison, the validation and the improvement of the calorimetric and similarity approaches.

AB - A Round Robin test was set up to obtain a cross comparison of participant's methods regarding a typical pressure relief device (bursting disc) sizing problem. The problem in question was a 'gassy' runaway reaction system: decomposition of 40% w/w dicumyl peroxide in 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate. The objective of the Round Robin exercise was to highlight the disparities in the participant's approaches and identify barriers and research needs. Two broad methods were used: one was the implementation of the DIERS method; the other was to follow a similarity or scale-up approach. The scale-up approach consists experimentally determining a minimum safe vent area and scaling up maintaining the vent area/volume ratio. This approach is similar to the one adopted by the UN committee on the Transport of Dangerous Goods for vent sizing of peroxide tankers using a 10 litre vessel. Very different results in terms of vent area were obtained from the seven participants. Analysis of the vent sizing calculations based on calorimetric data showed that the experimental conditions and their interpretation can significantly influence the estimated gas production rate and therefore the final vent area. However, the calculation of the vented mass flux stays largely responsible for the differences in calculated vent area. The critical factor lies in the assumption of single-phase (gas only) venting or two-phase (liquid and gas) venting. The reasons for assuming single-phase venting, which gives a lower vent area, are unclear and may not be justified. The comparison showed that the calorimetric and the similarity approaches diverged significantly when two-phase only venting was assumed. The Round Robin test highlighted the need for more experimental and modelling work towards predicting the nature of the vented fluid at large scale, and in the use of adiabatic calorimetry to determine the maximum gas production rate. Large-scale tests would allow the comparison, the validation and the improvement of the calorimetric and similarity approaches.

KW - Adiabatic calorimetry

KW - Dicumyl peroxide

KW - Pressure relief systems

KW - Reaction kinetics

KW - Runaway reaction

KW - UN method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906545188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906545188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781622767892

SP - 278

EP - 286

BT - 22nd Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium on Hazards 2011, HAZARDS 2011: Process Safety and Environmental Protection

PB - Institution of Chemical Engineers

ER -