Revaluing the costs and benefits of energy efficiency

A systematic review

Athar Kamal, Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, Muammer Koç

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Policy and decision makers, economists and engineers often have to choose between new-energy-generation installations for producing additional energy or reducing the energy consumption through energy efficiency measures. To enhance the decision-making process of the concerned parties with evidence-based comprehensive tools, we perform a literature review on the costs and benefits associated with energy efficiency and evaluate these costs and benefits against a new proposed framework. Energy projects are primarily developed to meet increases in demand for energy or to overhaul aging infrastructure. The costs and benefits associated with these projects are usually linked to monetary terms, and even though other costs are calculated, these other “environmental costs” are usually evaluated against some standards and then internalized in monetary terms. While economic and environmental costs are calculated for these projects, the “social costs” are often ignored. Our methodology follows the technique of quantifying a qualitative study by organizing, coding and interpreting results from the literature review. We find that on average, efficiency studies estimate only 6 of the 22 total efficiency benefits identified. Moreover, further analysis reveals the focus of such studies is primarily towards determining economic benefits whilst neglecting environmental and social utility of energy efficiency measures. This underestimation makes energy efficiency measures a less favorable option compared with new energy infrastructure installations, which usually introduces additional upfront costs, emissions and hazards to the land, water and air in addition to long-term social effects and costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-84
Number of pages17
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume54
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Energy efficiency
energy
efficiency
costs
Costs
social costs
infrastructure
Economic and social effects
Economics
energy consumption
social effects
economist
decision-making process
economics
decision maker
engineer
coding
Hazards
Energy utilization
Aging of materials

Keywords

  • Costs Benefits
  • Efficiency
  • Emissions
  • Energy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Fuel Technology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Revaluing the costs and benefits of energy efficiency : A systematic review. / Kamal, Athar; Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.; Koç, Muammer.

In: Energy Research and Social Science, Vol. 54, 01.08.2019, p. 68-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{50d9bd24eaa6475ab03bc3abe3fa9c39,
title = "Revaluing the costs and benefits of energy efficiency: A systematic review",
abstract = "Policy and decision makers, economists and engineers often have to choose between new-energy-generation installations for producing additional energy or reducing the energy consumption through energy efficiency measures. To enhance the decision-making process of the concerned parties with evidence-based comprehensive tools, we perform a literature review on the costs and benefits associated with energy efficiency and evaluate these costs and benefits against a new proposed framework. Energy projects are primarily developed to meet increases in demand for energy or to overhaul aging infrastructure. The costs and benefits associated with these projects are usually linked to monetary terms, and even though other costs are calculated, these other “environmental costs” are usually evaluated against some standards and then internalized in monetary terms. While economic and environmental costs are calculated for these projects, the “social costs” are often ignored. Our methodology follows the technique of quantifying a qualitative study by organizing, coding and interpreting results from the literature review. We find that on average, efficiency studies estimate only 6 of the 22 total efficiency benefits identified. Moreover, further analysis reveals the focus of such studies is primarily towards determining economic benefits whilst neglecting environmental and social utility of energy efficiency measures. This underestimation makes energy efficiency measures a less favorable option compared with new energy infrastructure installations, which usually introduces additional upfront costs, emissions and hazards to the land, water and air in addition to long-term social effects and costs.",
keywords = "Costs Benefits, Efficiency, Emissions, Energy",
author = "Athar Kamal and Al-Ghamdi, {Sami G.} and Muammer Ko{\cc}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.012",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "68--84",
journal = "Energy Research and Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revaluing the costs and benefits of energy efficiency

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Kamal, Athar

AU - Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.

AU - Koç, Muammer

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Policy and decision makers, economists and engineers often have to choose between new-energy-generation installations for producing additional energy or reducing the energy consumption through energy efficiency measures. To enhance the decision-making process of the concerned parties with evidence-based comprehensive tools, we perform a literature review on the costs and benefits associated with energy efficiency and evaluate these costs and benefits against a new proposed framework. Energy projects are primarily developed to meet increases in demand for energy or to overhaul aging infrastructure. The costs and benefits associated with these projects are usually linked to monetary terms, and even though other costs are calculated, these other “environmental costs” are usually evaluated against some standards and then internalized in monetary terms. While economic and environmental costs are calculated for these projects, the “social costs” are often ignored. Our methodology follows the technique of quantifying a qualitative study by organizing, coding and interpreting results from the literature review. We find that on average, efficiency studies estimate only 6 of the 22 total efficiency benefits identified. Moreover, further analysis reveals the focus of such studies is primarily towards determining economic benefits whilst neglecting environmental and social utility of energy efficiency measures. This underestimation makes energy efficiency measures a less favorable option compared with new energy infrastructure installations, which usually introduces additional upfront costs, emissions and hazards to the land, water and air in addition to long-term social effects and costs.

AB - Policy and decision makers, economists and engineers often have to choose between new-energy-generation installations for producing additional energy or reducing the energy consumption through energy efficiency measures. To enhance the decision-making process of the concerned parties with evidence-based comprehensive tools, we perform a literature review on the costs and benefits associated with energy efficiency and evaluate these costs and benefits against a new proposed framework. Energy projects are primarily developed to meet increases in demand for energy or to overhaul aging infrastructure. The costs and benefits associated with these projects are usually linked to monetary terms, and even though other costs are calculated, these other “environmental costs” are usually evaluated against some standards and then internalized in monetary terms. While economic and environmental costs are calculated for these projects, the “social costs” are often ignored. Our methodology follows the technique of quantifying a qualitative study by organizing, coding and interpreting results from the literature review. We find that on average, efficiency studies estimate only 6 of the 22 total efficiency benefits identified. Moreover, further analysis reveals the focus of such studies is primarily towards determining economic benefits whilst neglecting environmental and social utility of energy efficiency measures. This underestimation makes energy efficiency measures a less favorable option compared with new energy infrastructure installations, which usually introduces additional upfront costs, emissions and hazards to the land, water and air in addition to long-term social effects and costs.

KW - Costs Benefits

KW - Efficiency

KW - Emissions

KW - Energy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063970716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063970716&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.012

M3 - Review article

VL - 54

SP - 68

EP - 84

JO - Energy Research and Social Science

JF - Energy Research and Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -