Reliability assessment for operational wave forecasting system in prince william sound, alaska

Gaurav Singhal, Vijay Panchang, John L. Lillibridge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To ensure the safety of a variety of marine operations, ocean weather monitoring and prediction in many coastal regions have gained prominence over the last couple of decades. To support ongoing forecasting efforts in Prince William Sound, the site of the worst oil spill disaster in U.S. history, a three-way coupled wave forecasting system is developed. The issue of wave forecast reliability is addressed in the context of the associated uncertainty that confronts the manager of engineering operations or other planners. This issue has generally not been systematically addressed in literature. High-resolution 36-h daily forecasts of significant wave heights (SWHs) are compared with measurements from buoys and satellites for about 1 year. The results show that 70% of the peak SWHs (in the range 5–8 m) were predicted with an accuracy of 15% or less for a forecast lead time of 9 h. The errors are larger for smaller SWHs. Correlation coefficients (R2) and indices of agreement (D) between predicted and measured SWHs were reasonable and generally more than 0.78 for all lead times. On average, our analysis showed 70% or greater likelihood of the prediction falling within a tolerance of ±(1 × RMSE) for all lead times. Barring changes in model physics, resolution, etc., similar acceptance levels could be expected from comparable systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-349
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering
Volume136
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

significant wave height
Acoustic waves
prediction
oil spill
Buoys
disaster
physics
tolerance
Oil spills
safety
engineering
Disasters
sound
ocean
Managers
Physics
history
Satellites
forecast
Monitoring

Keywords

  • Likelihood of occurrence
  • Prince William Sound
  • Wave forecast reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering

Cite this

Reliability assessment for operational wave forecasting system in prince william sound, alaska. / Singhal, Gaurav; Panchang, Vijay; Lillibridge, John L.

In: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 6, 01.11.2010, p. 337-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4af626e5f1ca438ca0cd856e6099843b,
title = "Reliability assessment for operational wave forecasting system in prince william sound, alaska",
abstract = "To ensure the safety of a variety of marine operations, ocean weather monitoring and prediction in many coastal regions have gained prominence over the last couple of decades. To support ongoing forecasting efforts in Prince William Sound, the site of the worst oil spill disaster in U.S. history, a three-way coupled wave forecasting system is developed. The issue of wave forecast reliability is addressed in the context of the associated uncertainty that confronts the manager of engineering operations or other planners. This issue has generally not been systematically addressed in literature. High-resolution 36-h daily forecasts of significant wave heights (SWHs) are compared with measurements from buoys and satellites for about 1 year. The results show that 70{\%} of the peak SWHs (in the range 5–8 m) were predicted with an accuracy of 15{\%} or less for a forecast lead time of 9 h. The errors are larger for smaller SWHs. Correlation coefficients (R2) and indices of agreement (D) between predicted and measured SWHs were reasonable and generally more than 0.78 for all lead times. On average, our analysis showed 70{\%} or greater likelihood of the prediction falling within a tolerance of ±(1 × RMSE) for all lead times. Barring changes in model physics, resolution, etc., similar acceptance levels could be expected from comparable systems.",
keywords = "Likelihood of occurrence, Prince William Sound, Wave forecast reliability",
author = "Gaurav Singhal and Vijay Panchang and Lillibridge, {John L.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000056",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "337--349",
journal = "Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering",
issn = "0733-950X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability assessment for operational wave forecasting system in prince william sound, alaska

AU - Singhal, Gaurav

AU - Panchang, Vijay

AU - Lillibridge, John L.

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - To ensure the safety of a variety of marine operations, ocean weather monitoring and prediction in many coastal regions have gained prominence over the last couple of decades. To support ongoing forecasting efforts in Prince William Sound, the site of the worst oil spill disaster in U.S. history, a three-way coupled wave forecasting system is developed. The issue of wave forecast reliability is addressed in the context of the associated uncertainty that confronts the manager of engineering operations or other planners. This issue has generally not been systematically addressed in literature. High-resolution 36-h daily forecasts of significant wave heights (SWHs) are compared with measurements from buoys and satellites for about 1 year. The results show that 70% of the peak SWHs (in the range 5–8 m) were predicted with an accuracy of 15% or less for a forecast lead time of 9 h. The errors are larger for smaller SWHs. Correlation coefficients (R2) and indices of agreement (D) between predicted and measured SWHs were reasonable and generally more than 0.78 for all lead times. On average, our analysis showed 70% or greater likelihood of the prediction falling within a tolerance of ±(1 × RMSE) for all lead times. Barring changes in model physics, resolution, etc., similar acceptance levels could be expected from comparable systems.

AB - To ensure the safety of a variety of marine operations, ocean weather monitoring and prediction in many coastal regions have gained prominence over the last couple of decades. To support ongoing forecasting efforts in Prince William Sound, the site of the worst oil spill disaster in U.S. history, a three-way coupled wave forecasting system is developed. The issue of wave forecast reliability is addressed in the context of the associated uncertainty that confronts the manager of engineering operations or other planners. This issue has generally not been systematically addressed in literature. High-resolution 36-h daily forecasts of significant wave heights (SWHs) are compared with measurements from buoys and satellites for about 1 year. The results show that 70% of the peak SWHs (in the range 5–8 m) were predicted with an accuracy of 15% or less for a forecast lead time of 9 h. The errors are larger for smaller SWHs. Correlation coefficients (R2) and indices of agreement (D) between predicted and measured SWHs were reasonable and generally more than 0.78 for all lead times. On average, our analysis showed 70% or greater likelihood of the prediction falling within a tolerance of ±(1 × RMSE) for all lead times. Barring changes in model physics, resolution, etc., similar acceptance levels could be expected from comparable systems.

KW - Likelihood of occurrence

KW - Prince William Sound

KW - Wave forecast reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85001858062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85001858062&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000056

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000056

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 337

EP - 349

JO - Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering

JF - Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering

SN - 0733-950X

IS - 6

ER -