Reduction and oxidation kinetic modeling of NiO-based oxygen transfer materials

Dimitris Ipsakis, Eleni Heracleous, Lishil Silvester, Dragomir B. Bukur, Angeliki A. Lemonidou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the redox kinetics of four NiO-based oxygen transfer materials (OTMs) supported on Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2 and ZrO2. The OTMs were tested and evaluated under twenty consecutive methane reduction/air oxidation cycles. Several solid-state kinetic models were consecutively and optimally screened for each OTM at different redox cycles. The use of different supports resulted in different forms of the redox kinetics. NiO/Al2O3 and NiO/TiO2 reduction kinetics were rate-determined by chemical reaction and fitted via the Unreacted Shrinking Core Model. On the other hand, NiO/ZrO2 and NiO/SiO2 reduction was found to proceed via nucleation and subsequent nuclei growth and was suitably described with Avrami-Erofeev models. The use of different types of kinetic models is attributed to differences in strength of metal-support interactions. Specifically, the strong interaction between NiO and Al2O3 and TiO2 creates NiO-support interfaces where Ni nuclei are formed very fast, rendering the chemical reaction the governing step of the reduction process. When NiO is supported on SiO2 and ZrO2, the interaction is weak and NiO basically behaves like free NiO, reducing via the slow formation of homogeneous nuclei on the surface and the subsequent faster growth of Ni domains. Regarding Ni oxidation kinetics, all OTMs were rate-determined by nucleation and nuclei growth. NiO/Al2O3 and NiO/TiO2 OTMs followed an Avrami-Erofeev model approach for all considered cycles, while NiO/ZrO2 oxidation kinetics were described via a Prout-Tompkins model that considered a short but still, significant nucleation period.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)840-852
Number of pages13
JournalChemical Engineering Journal
Volume308
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Oxygen
oxidation
kinetics
Oxidation
oxygen
Kinetics
modeling
nucleation
Nucleation
chemical reaction
Chemical reactions
Methane
material
methane
Metals
metal
air
Air
Oxidation-Reduction
rate

Keywords

  • NiO supported oxygen carriers
  • Nucleation and nuclei growth model
  • Shrinking core model
  • Solid-state reduction/oxidation kinetic modeling
  • Sorption enhanced chemical looping steam methane reforming

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

Reduction and oxidation kinetic modeling of NiO-based oxygen transfer materials. / Ipsakis, Dimitris; Heracleous, Eleni; Silvester, Lishil; Bukur, Dragomir B.; Lemonidou, Angeliki A.

In: Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 308, 15.01.2017, p. 840-852.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ipsakis, Dimitris ; Heracleous, Eleni ; Silvester, Lishil ; Bukur, Dragomir B. ; Lemonidou, Angeliki A. / Reduction and oxidation kinetic modeling of NiO-based oxygen transfer materials. In: Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 308. pp. 840-852.
@article{93735c5104c04065b84446f110645c51,
title = "Reduction and oxidation kinetic modeling of NiO-based oxygen transfer materials",
abstract = "This study investigates the redox kinetics of four NiO-based oxygen transfer materials (OTMs) supported on Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2 and ZrO2. The OTMs were tested and evaluated under twenty consecutive methane reduction/air oxidation cycles. Several solid-state kinetic models were consecutively and optimally screened for each OTM at different redox cycles. The use of different supports resulted in different forms of the redox kinetics. NiO/Al2O3 and NiO/TiO2 reduction kinetics were rate-determined by chemical reaction and fitted via the Unreacted Shrinking Core Model. On the other hand, NiO/ZrO2 and NiO/SiO2 reduction was found to proceed via nucleation and subsequent nuclei growth and was suitably described with Avrami-Erofeev models. The use of different types of kinetic models is attributed to differences in strength of metal-support interactions. Specifically, the strong interaction between NiO and Al2O3 and TiO2 creates NiO-support interfaces where Ni nuclei are formed very fast, rendering the chemical reaction the governing step of the reduction process. When NiO is supported on SiO2 and ZrO2, the interaction is weak and NiO basically behaves like free NiO, reducing via the slow formation of homogeneous nuclei on the surface and the subsequent faster growth of Ni domains. Regarding Ni oxidation kinetics, all OTMs were rate-determined by nucleation and nuclei growth. NiO/Al2O3 and NiO/TiO2 OTMs followed an Avrami-Erofeev model approach for all considered cycles, while NiO/ZrO2 oxidation kinetics were described via a Prout-Tompkins model that considered a short but still, significant nucleation period.",
keywords = "NiO supported oxygen carriers, Nucleation and nuclei growth model, Shrinking core model, Solid-state reduction/oxidation kinetic modeling, Sorption enhanced chemical looping steam methane reforming",
author = "Dimitris Ipsakis and Eleni Heracleous and Lishil Silvester and Bukur, {Dragomir B.} and Lemonidou, {Angeliki A.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.114",
language = "English",
volume = "308",
pages = "840--852",
journal = "Chemical Engineering Journal",
issn = "1385-8947",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reduction and oxidation kinetic modeling of NiO-based oxygen transfer materials

AU - Ipsakis, Dimitris

AU - Heracleous, Eleni

AU - Silvester, Lishil

AU - Bukur, Dragomir B.

AU - Lemonidou, Angeliki A.

PY - 2017/1/15

Y1 - 2017/1/15

N2 - This study investigates the redox kinetics of four NiO-based oxygen transfer materials (OTMs) supported on Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2 and ZrO2. The OTMs were tested and evaluated under twenty consecutive methane reduction/air oxidation cycles. Several solid-state kinetic models were consecutively and optimally screened for each OTM at different redox cycles. The use of different supports resulted in different forms of the redox kinetics. NiO/Al2O3 and NiO/TiO2 reduction kinetics were rate-determined by chemical reaction and fitted via the Unreacted Shrinking Core Model. On the other hand, NiO/ZrO2 and NiO/SiO2 reduction was found to proceed via nucleation and subsequent nuclei growth and was suitably described with Avrami-Erofeev models. The use of different types of kinetic models is attributed to differences in strength of metal-support interactions. Specifically, the strong interaction between NiO and Al2O3 and TiO2 creates NiO-support interfaces where Ni nuclei are formed very fast, rendering the chemical reaction the governing step of the reduction process. When NiO is supported on SiO2 and ZrO2, the interaction is weak and NiO basically behaves like free NiO, reducing via the slow formation of homogeneous nuclei on the surface and the subsequent faster growth of Ni domains. Regarding Ni oxidation kinetics, all OTMs were rate-determined by nucleation and nuclei growth. NiO/Al2O3 and NiO/TiO2 OTMs followed an Avrami-Erofeev model approach for all considered cycles, while NiO/ZrO2 oxidation kinetics were described via a Prout-Tompkins model that considered a short but still, significant nucleation period.

AB - This study investigates the redox kinetics of four NiO-based oxygen transfer materials (OTMs) supported on Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2 and ZrO2. The OTMs were tested and evaluated under twenty consecutive methane reduction/air oxidation cycles. Several solid-state kinetic models were consecutively and optimally screened for each OTM at different redox cycles. The use of different supports resulted in different forms of the redox kinetics. NiO/Al2O3 and NiO/TiO2 reduction kinetics were rate-determined by chemical reaction and fitted via the Unreacted Shrinking Core Model. On the other hand, NiO/ZrO2 and NiO/SiO2 reduction was found to proceed via nucleation and subsequent nuclei growth and was suitably described with Avrami-Erofeev models. The use of different types of kinetic models is attributed to differences in strength of metal-support interactions. Specifically, the strong interaction between NiO and Al2O3 and TiO2 creates NiO-support interfaces where Ni nuclei are formed very fast, rendering the chemical reaction the governing step of the reduction process. When NiO is supported on SiO2 and ZrO2, the interaction is weak and NiO basically behaves like free NiO, reducing via the slow formation of homogeneous nuclei on the surface and the subsequent faster growth of Ni domains. Regarding Ni oxidation kinetics, all OTMs were rate-determined by nucleation and nuclei growth. NiO/Al2O3 and NiO/TiO2 OTMs followed an Avrami-Erofeev model approach for all considered cycles, while NiO/ZrO2 oxidation kinetics were described via a Prout-Tompkins model that considered a short but still, significant nucleation period.

KW - NiO supported oxygen carriers

KW - Nucleation and nuclei growth model

KW - Shrinking core model

KW - Solid-state reduction/oxidation kinetic modeling

KW - Sorption enhanced chemical looping steam methane reforming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989898668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989898668&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.114

DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.114

M3 - Article

VL - 308

SP - 840

EP - 852

JO - Chemical Engineering Journal

JF - Chemical Engineering Journal

SN - 1385-8947

ER -