Re-Defining Defamation: Psychological Sense of Community in the Age of the Internet

Amy Sanders, Natalie Christine Olsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the era of traditional media, courts typically relied upon geographic constraints, including where a plaintiff lived or worked, to determine the appropriate community in defamation cases. The rise of the Internet has dramatically changed society - easily and immediately linking users across geography while allowing the rapid spread of information through a variety of channels that pose a challenge to the traditional media model centered around editorial judgment and professional ethics. Thanks in part to its global reach, the Internet has allowed users to engage in both business and social relationships around the world. Because of this, a person's need for a good reputation can no longer be confined solely to location. As a result, this article argues that courts must begin to evaluate other factors when determining relevant community in online defamation cases, positing that courts should utilize factors associated with psychological sense of community theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-384
Number of pages30
JournalCommunication Law and Policy
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internet
community
professional ethics
reputation
geography
Industry
human being
Society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Law

Cite this

Re-Defining Defamation : Psychological Sense of Community in the Age of the Internet. / Sanders, Amy; Olsen, Natalie Christine.

In: Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 17, No. 4, 09.2012, p. 355-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4603ff2c0cc945f99f178e24c7899e0e,
title = "Re-Defining Defamation: Psychological Sense of Community in the Age of the Internet",
abstract = "In the era of traditional media, courts typically relied upon geographic constraints, including where a plaintiff lived or worked, to determine the appropriate community in defamation cases. The rise of the Internet has dramatically changed society - easily and immediately linking users across geography while allowing the rapid spread of information through a variety of channels that pose a challenge to the traditional media model centered around editorial judgment and professional ethics. Thanks in part to its global reach, the Internet has allowed users to engage in both business and social relationships around the world. Because of this, a person's need for a good reputation can no longer be confined solely to location. As a result, this article argues that courts must begin to evaluate other factors when determining relevant community in online defamation cases, positing that courts should utilize factors associated with psychological sense of community theory.",
author = "Amy Sanders and Olsen, {Natalie Christine}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/10811680.2012.717492",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "355--384",
journal = "Communication Law and Policy",
issn = "1081-1680",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-Defining Defamation

T2 - Psychological Sense of Community in the Age of the Internet

AU - Sanders, Amy

AU - Olsen, Natalie Christine

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - In the era of traditional media, courts typically relied upon geographic constraints, including where a plaintiff lived or worked, to determine the appropriate community in defamation cases. The rise of the Internet has dramatically changed society - easily and immediately linking users across geography while allowing the rapid spread of information through a variety of channels that pose a challenge to the traditional media model centered around editorial judgment and professional ethics. Thanks in part to its global reach, the Internet has allowed users to engage in both business and social relationships around the world. Because of this, a person's need for a good reputation can no longer be confined solely to location. As a result, this article argues that courts must begin to evaluate other factors when determining relevant community in online defamation cases, positing that courts should utilize factors associated with psychological sense of community theory.

AB - In the era of traditional media, courts typically relied upon geographic constraints, including where a plaintiff lived or worked, to determine the appropriate community in defamation cases. The rise of the Internet has dramatically changed society - easily and immediately linking users across geography while allowing the rapid spread of information through a variety of channels that pose a challenge to the traditional media model centered around editorial judgment and professional ethics. Thanks in part to its global reach, the Internet has allowed users to engage in both business and social relationships around the world. Because of this, a person's need for a good reputation can no longer be confined solely to location. As a result, this article argues that courts must begin to evaluate other factors when determining relevant community in online defamation cases, positing that courts should utilize factors associated with psychological sense of community theory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867327638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867327638&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10811680.2012.717492

DO - 10.1080/10811680.2012.717492

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84867327638

VL - 17

SP - 355

EP - 384

JO - Communication Law and Policy

JF - Communication Law and Policy

SN - 1081-1680

IS - 4

ER -