Quantification of DCE-MRI: A validation of three techniques with 3D-histology

Karin Bol, Joost C. Haeck, Lejla Alic, Wiro J. Niessen, Marion De Jong, Monique Bernsen, Jifke F. Veenland

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Three different DCE-MRI quantification methods: model-free-based, compartment-model-based and principal component analysis, are compared by evaluating parameter maps for histological defined volumes of vital and non-vital tumor tissue. To obtain an accurate spatial correspondence between histology and DCE-MRI, a two-step registration process was used involving dense histological sampling, a reference plane and an intermediate ex vivo MRI. Results show that the model-free parameter washout and the second principal component score can adequately separate vital from non-vital tumor tissue, with an accuracy of respectively 99.2% and 99.7%. The other model-free parameters and the compartment-model-based Ktrans show some overlap in values between vital and non-vital tissue. The first, third and fourth pc-score have limited discriminative power.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging
Subtitle of host publicationFrom Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012 - Proceedings
Pages1044-1047
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes
Event2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012 - Barcelona, Spain
Duration: 2 May 20125 May 2012

Other

Other2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012
CountrySpain
CityBarcelona
Period2/5/125/5/12

Fingerprint

Histology
Magnetic resonance imaging
Tissue
Tumors
Principal Component Analysis
Neoplasms
Principal component analysis
Sampling

Keywords

  • DCE-MRI
  • histology
  • model-free analysis
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • standard Tofts model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Bol, K., Haeck, J. C., Alic, L., Niessen, W. J., De Jong, M., Bernsen, M., & Veenland, J. F. (2012). Quantification of DCE-MRI: A validation of three techniques with 3D-histology. In 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012 - Proceedings (pp. 1044-1047). [6235737] https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235737

Quantification of DCE-MRI : A validation of three techniques with 3D-histology. / Bol, Karin; Haeck, Joost C.; Alic, Lejla; Niessen, Wiro J.; De Jong, Marion; Bernsen, Monique; Veenland, Jifke F.

2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012 - Proceedings. 2012. p. 1044-1047 6235737.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bol, K, Haeck, JC, Alic, L, Niessen, WJ, De Jong, M, Bernsen, M & Veenland, JF 2012, Quantification of DCE-MRI: A validation of three techniques with 3D-histology. in 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012 - Proceedings., 6235737, pp. 1044-1047, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012, Barcelona, Spain, 2/5/12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235737
Bol K, Haeck JC, Alic L, Niessen WJ, De Jong M, Bernsen M et al. Quantification of DCE-MRI: A validation of three techniques with 3D-histology. In 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012 - Proceedings. 2012. p. 1044-1047. 6235737 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235737
Bol, Karin ; Haeck, Joost C. ; Alic, Lejla ; Niessen, Wiro J. ; De Jong, Marion ; Bernsen, Monique ; Veenland, Jifke F. / Quantification of DCE-MRI : A validation of three techniques with 3D-histology. 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2012 - Proceedings. 2012. pp. 1044-1047
@inproceedings{39544298d06d4a1dae239446add88602,
title = "Quantification of DCE-MRI: A validation of three techniques with 3D-histology",
abstract = "Three different DCE-MRI quantification methods: model-free-based, compartment-model-based and principal component analysis, are compared by evaluating parameter maps for histological defined volumes of vital and non-vital tumor tissue. To obtain an accurate spatial correspondence between histology and DCE-MRI, a two-step registration process was used involving dense histological sampling, a reference plane and an intermediate ex vivo MRI. Results show that the model-free parameter washout and the second principal component score can adequately separate vital from non-vital tumor tissue, with an accuracy of respectively 99.2{\%} and 99.7{\%}. The other model-free parameters and the compartment-model-based Ktrans show some overlap in values between vital and non-vital tissue. The first, third and fourth pc-score have limited discriminative power.",
keywords = "DCE-MRI, histology, model-free analysis, Principal Component Analysis, standard Tofts model",
author = "Karin Bol and Haeck, {Joost C.} and Lejla Alic and Niessen, {Wiro J.} and {De Jong}, Marion and Monique Bernsen and Veenland, {Jifke F.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235737",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781457718588",
pages = "1044--1047",
booktitle = "2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Quantification of DCE-MRI

T2 - A validation of three techniques with 3D-histology

AU - Bol, Karin

AU - Haeck, Joost C.

AU - Alic, Lejla

AU - Niessen, Wiro J.

AU - De Jong, Marion

AU - Bernsen, Monique

AU - Veenland, Jifke F.

PY - 2012/8/15

Y1 - 2012/8/15

N2 - Three different DCE-MRI quantification methods: model-free-based, compartment-model-based and principal component analysis, are compared by evaluating parameter maps for histological defined volumes of vital and non-vital tumor tissue. To obtain an accurate spatial correspondence between histology and DCE-MRI, a two-step registration process was used involving dense histological sampling, a reference plane and an intermediate ex vivo MRI. Results show that the model-free parameter washout and the second principal component score can adequately separate vital from non-vital tumor tissue, with an accuracy of respectively 99.2% and 99.7%. The other model-free parameters and the compartment-model-based Ktrans show some overlap in values between vital and non-vital tissue. The first, third and fourth pc-score have limited discriminative power.

AB - Three different DCE-MRI quantification methods: model-free-based, compartment-model-based and principal component analysis, are compared by evaluating parameter maps for histological defined volumes of vital and non-vital tumor tissue. To obtain an accurate spatial correspondence between histology and DCE-MRI, a two-step registration process was used involving dense histological sampling, a reference plane and an intermediate ex vivo MRI. Results show that the model-free parameter washout and the second principal component score can adequately separate vital from non-vital tumor tissue, with an accuracy of respectively 99.2% and 99.7%. The other model-free parameters and the compartment-model-based Ktrans show some overlap in values between vital and non-vital tissue. The first, third and fourth pc-score have limited discriminative power.

KW - DCE-MRI

KW - histology

KW - model-free analysis

KW - Principal Component Analysis

KW - standard Tofts model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864863391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864863391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235737

DO - 10.1109/ISBI.2012.6235737

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84864863391

SN - 9781457718588

SP - 1044

EP - 1047

BT - 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging

ER -