Previous abdominal surgery and closed entry for gynaecological laparoscopy

A prospective study

Arash Rafii Tabrizi, Sophie Camatte, Loïc Lelièvre, Emile Daraï, Fabrice Lécuru

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the morbidity from closed laparoscopic access and define the role of previous surgery on the occurrence of these complications. Design and Methods: We prospectively recorded data on all laparoscopic procedures between January 2000 and January 2001. We compared results from patients without previous abdominal surgery (group I) with patients with prior abdominal surgery (group II). The insertion site for the Verres needle was trans-umbilical for patients in group I and in the left upper quadrant for patients in group II. Setting: Gynaecology department of a University Hospital. Population: All laparoscopic procedures between January 2000 and January 2001. Main outcome measures: We compared results from patients without previous abdominal surgery (group I) with patients with prior abdominal surgery (group II). The insertion site for the Verres needle was trans-umbilical for patients in group I and the left upper quadrant for patients in group II. Results: Four hundred and seventy-seven laparoscopies were carried out during the study period, 368 women without previous surgery were included in group I, and 109 women were included in group II. We recorded 1 complication (overall complication rate of 0.2% and 31 incidents (6.4%). One complication (small bowel injury) was related to the insertion of the Verres needle (0.2%). The incidents and complications occurred only in group II (P < 0.05). All the complications were treated by laparoscopy. Conclusion: The complication rate of the entry step is low in gynaecological laparoscopy. A previous history of laparotomy increases the risk of these complications and incidents. Safety rules and other access method should be investigated for these patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)100-102
Number of pages3
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume112
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laparoscopy
Prospective Studies
Needles
Umbilicus
Gynecology
Laparotomy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Morbidity
Safety
Wounds and Injuries
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Cite this

Previous abdominal surgery and closed entry for gynaecological laparoscopy : A prospective study. / Tabrizi, Arash Rafii; Camatte, Sophie; Lelièvre, Loïc; Daraï, Emile; Lécuru, Fabrice.

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 112, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 100-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tabrizi, Arash Rafii ; Camatte, Sophie ; Lelièvre, Loïc ; Daraï, Emile ; Lécuru, Fabrice. / Previous abdominal surgery and closed entry for gynaecological laparoscopy : A prospective study. In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2005 ; Vol. 112, No. 1. pp. 100-102.
@article{4265f875384c4eeba9cbeb3e15baa638,
title = "Previous abdominal surgery and closed entry for gynaecological laparoscopy: A prospective study",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the morbidity from closed laparoscopic access and define the role of previous surgery on the occurrence of these complications. Design and Methods: We prospectively recorded data on all laparoscopic procedures between January 2000 and January 2001. We compared results from patients without previous abdominal surgery (group I) with patients with prior abdominal surgery (group II). The insertion site for the Verres needle was trans-umbilical for patients in group I and in the left upper quadrant for patients in group II. Setting: Gynaecology department of a University Hospital. Population: All laparoscopic procedures between January 2000 and January 2001. Main outcome measures: We compared results from patients without previous abdominal surgery (group I) with patients with prior abdominal surgery (group II). The insertion site for the Verres needle was trans-umbilical for patients in group I and the left upper quadrant for patients in group II. Results: Four hundred and seventy-seven laparoscopies were carried out during the study period, 368 women without previous surgery were included in group I, and 109 women were included in group II. We recorded 1 complication (overall complication rate of 0.2{\%} and 31 incidents (6.4{\%}). One complication (small bowel injury) was related to the insertion of the Verres needle (0.2{\%}). The incidents and complications occurred only in group II (P < 0.05). All the complications were treated by laparoscopy. Conclusion: The complication rate of the entry step is low in gynaecological laparoscopy. A previous history of laparotomy increases the risk of these complications and incidents. Safety rules and other access method should be investigated for these patients.",
author = "Tabrizi, {Arash Rafii} and Sophie Camatte and Lo{\"i}c Leli{\`e}vre and Emile Dara{\"i} and Fabrice L{\'e}curu",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00298.x",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "100--102",
journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Previous abdominal surgery and closed entry for gynaecological laparoscopy

T2 - A prospective study

AU - Tabrizi, Arash Rafii

AU - Camatte, Sophie

AU - Lelièvre, Loïc

AU - Daraï, Emile

AU - Lécuru, Fabrice

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess the morbidity from closed laparoscopic access and define the role of previous surgery on the occurrence of these complications. Design and Methods: We prospectively recorded data on all laparoscopic procedures between January 2000 and January 2001. We compared results from patients without previous abdominal surgery (group I) with patients with prior abdominal surgery (group II). The insertion site for the Verres needle was trans-umbilical for patients in group I and in the left upper quadrant for patients in group II. Setting: Gynaecology department of a University Hospital. Population: All laparoscopic procedures between January 2000 and January 2001. Main outcome measures: We compared results from patients without previous abdominal surgery (group I) with patients with prior abdominal surgery (group II). The insertion site for the Verres needle was trans-umbilical for patients in group I and the left upper quadrant for patients in group II. Results: Four hundred and seventy-seven laparoscopies were carried out during the study period, 368 women without previous surgery were included in group I, and 109 women were included in group II. We recorded 1 complication (overall complication rate of 0.2% and 31 incidents (6.4%). One complication (small bowel injury) was related to the insertion of the Verres needle (0.2%). The incidents and complications occurred only in group II (P < 0.05). All the complications were treated by laparoscopy. Conclusion: The complication rate of the entry step is low in gynaecological laparoscopy. A previous history of laparotomy increases the risk of these complications and incidents. Safety rules and other access method should be investigated for these patients.

AB - Objectives: To assess the morbidity from closed laparoscopic access and define the role of previous surgery on the occurrence of these complications. Design and Methods: We prospectively recorded data on all laparoscopic procedures between January 2000 and January 2001. We compared results from patients without previous abdominal surgery (group I) with patients with prior abdominal surgery (group II). The insertion site for the Verres needle was trans-umbilical for patients in group I and in the left upper quadrant for patients in group II. Setting: Gynaecology department of a University Hospital. Population: All laparoscopic procedures between January 2000 and January 2001. Main outcome measures: We compared results from patients without previous abdominal surgery (group I) with patients with prior abdominal surgery (group II). The insertion site for the Verres needle was trans-umbilical for patients in group I and the left upper quadrant for patients in group II. Results: Four hundred and seventy-seven laparoscopies were carried out during the study period, 368 women without previous surgery were included in group I, and 109 women were included in group II. We recorded 1 complication (overall complication rate of 0.2% and 31 incidents (6.4%). One complication (small bowel injury) was related to the insertion of the Verres needle (0.2%). The incidents and complications occurred only in group II (P < 0.05). All the complications were treated by laparoscopy. Conclusion: The complication rate of the entry step is low in gynaecological laparoscopy. A previous history of laparotomy increases the risk of these complications and incidents. Safety rules and other access method should be investigated for these patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11844305005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11844305005&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00298.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00298.x

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 100

EP - 102

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 1

ER -