Possible alternatives for gas-charged accumulators in deep waters

Mahmood Amani, M. Mir Rajabi, H. C. Juvkam-Wold, J. J. Schubert

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Gas Charged Accumulators are widely used in Drilling operations. These accumulators are not efficient at all in Deep waters, and there are not many alternatives for them. This paper looks into possible alternatives for Gas Charged Accumulators in Deep Waters. Supplying enough volume of pressurized hydraulic fluid to operate the BOPs for emergency situations is essential for Deep Water Drilling. This requires storing the pressurized hydraulic fluid in accumulators. A problem may arise when the wellhead is at water depth of more than 3500 ft. In deep water drilling, the accumulators are placed on the subsea BOP stack to reduce hydraulic response times and provide a hydraulic power supply in case of interruption of surface communication. Hydraulic fluid capacity of an accumulator may drop to 15% of its capacity on the surface and even less, depending on the water depth. The reason for this is that the nitrogen gas does not behave like an ideal gas as we go to very deep water, due to high hydrostatic pressure at that water depth. The possibility of the use of springs and heavy weights as possible replacements for nitrogen in the structure of accumulators will be discussed in this paper. High hydrostatic pressure of deepwater will not affect the functionality of these mechanical accumulators. Transferring bank of accumulators to the surface and connecting them to the BOP with properly sized and rigid pipes can decrease response time to an acceptable level to satisfy regulations and standards. This idea can be considered as an alternative solution too. We have to include the hydrostatic pressure of water in the usable fluid calculation. A low pressure tank located on the sea-floor can dismiss the negative effect of high hydrostatic pressure of seawater. This alternative idea is also discussed. Using a column of high density fluid as the accumulator system is another alternative method that is presented in this paper and should be investigated further for such application.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas
Pages32-48
Number of pages17
Volume1
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes
EventInternational Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas - Beijing, China
Duration: 5 Dec 20067 Dec 2006

Other

OtherInternational Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas
CountryChina
CityBeijing
Period5/12/067/12/06

Fingerprint

Gases
Hydrostatic pressure
Water
Hydraulic fluids
Drilling
Hydraulics
Nitrogen
Wellheads
Fluids
Seawater
Pipe
Communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Amani, M., Mir Rajabi, M., Juvkam-Wold, H. C., & Schubert, J. J. (2006). Possible alternatives for gas-charged accumulators in deep waters. In International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas (Vol. 1, pp. 32-48)

Possible alternatives for gas-charged accumulators in deep waters. / Amani, Mahmood; Mir Rajabi, M.; Juvkam-Wold, H. C.; Schubert, J. J.

International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas. Vol. 1 2006. p. 32-48.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Amani, M, Mir Rajabi, M, Juvkam-Wold, HC & Schubert, JJ 2006, Possible alternatives for gas-charged accumulators in deep waters. in International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas. vol. 1, pp. 32-48, International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas, Beijing, China, 5/12/06.
Amani M, Mir Rajabi M, Juvkam-Wold HC, Schubert JJ. Possible alternatives for gas-charged accumulators in deep waters. In International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas. Vol. 1. 2006. p. 32-48
Amani, Mahmood ; Mir Rajabi, M. ; Juvkam-Wold, H. C. ; Schubert, J. J. / Possible alternatives for gas-charged accumulators in deep waters. International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas. Vol. 1 2006. pp. 32-48
@inproceedings{50b151365fca4f9a9c044e9a38241a0b,
title = "Possible alternatives for gas-charged accumulators in deep waters",
abstract = "Gas Charged Accumulators are widely used in Drilling operations. These accumulators are not efficient at all in Deep waters, and there are not many alternatives for them. This paper looks into possible alternatives for Gas Charged Accumulators in Deep Waters. Supplying enough volume of pressurized hydraulic fluid to operate the BOPs for emergency situations is essential for Deep Water Drilling. This requires storing the pressurized hydraulic fluid in accumulators. A problem may arise when the wellhead is at water depth of more than 3500 ft. In deep water drilling, the accumulators are placed on the subsea BOP stack to reduce hydraulic response times and provide a hydraulic power supply in case of interruption of surface communication. Hydraulic fluid capacity of an accumulator may drop to 15{\%} of its capacity on the surface and even less, depending on the water depth. The reason for this is that the nitrogen gas does not behave like an ideal gas as we go to very deep water, due to high hydrostatic pressure at that water depth. The possibility of the use of springs and heavy weights as possible replacements for nitrogen in the structure of accumulators will be discussed in this paper. High hydrostatic pressure of deepwater will not affect the functionality of these mechanical accumulators. Transferring bank of accumulators to the surface and connecting them to the BOP with properly sized and rigid pipes can decrease response time to an acceptable level to satisfy regulations and standards. This idea can be considered as an alternative solution too. We have to include the hydrostatic pressure of water in the usable fluid calculation. A low pressure tank located on the sea-floor can dismiss the negative effect of high hydrostatic pressure of seawater. This alternative idea is also discussed. Using a column of high density fluid as the accumulator system is another alternative method that is presented in this paper and should be investigated further for such application.",
author = "Mahmood Amani and {Mir Rajabi}, M. and Juvkam-Wold, {H. C.} and Schubert, {J. J.}",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "32--48",
booktitle = "International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Possible alternatives for gas-charged accumulators in deep waters

AU - Amani, Mahmood

AU - Mir Rajabi, M.

AU - Juvkam-Wold, H. C.

AU - Schubert, J. J.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Gas Charged Accumulators are widely used in Drilling operations. These accumulators are not efficient at all in Deep waters, and there are not many alternatives for them. This paper looks into possible alternatives for Gas Charged Accumulators in Deep Waters. Supplying enough volume of pressurized hydraulic fluid to operate the BOPs for emergency situations is essential for Deep Water Drilling. This requires storing the pressurized hydraulic fluid in accumulators. A problem may arise when the wellhead is at water depth of more than 3500 ft. In deep water drilling, the accumulators are placed on the subsea BOP stack to reduce hydraulic response times and provide a hydraulic power supply in case of interruption of surface communication. Hydraulic fluid capacity of an accumulator may drop to 15% of its capacity on the surface and even less, depending on the water depth. The reason for this is that the nitrogen gas does not behave like an ideal gas as we go to very deep water, due to high hydrostatic pressure at that water depth. The possibility of the use of springs and heavy weights as possible replacements for nitrogen in the structure of accumulators will be discussed in this paper. High hydrostatic pressure of deepwater will not affect the functionality of these mechanical accumulators. Transferring bank of accumulators to the surface and connecting them to the BOP with properly sized and rigid pipes can decrease response time to an acceptable level to satisfy regulations and standards. This idea can be considered as an alternative solution too. We have to include the hydrostatic pressure of water in the usable fluid calculation. A low pressure tank located on the sea-floor can dismiss the negative effect of high hydrostatic pressure of seawater. This alternative idea is also discussed. Using a column of high density fluid as the accumulator system is another alternative method that is presented in this paper and should be investigated further for such application.

AB - Gas Charged Accumulators are widely used in Drilling operations. These accumulators are not efficient at all in Deep waters, and there are not many alternatives for them. This paper looks into possible alternatives for Gas Charged Accumulators in Deep Waters. Supplying enough volume of pressurized hydraulic fluid to operate the BOPs for emergency situations is essential for Deep Water Drilling. This requires storing the pressurized hydraulic fluid in accumulators. A problem may arise when the wellhead is at water depth of more than 3500 ft. In deep water drilling, the accumulators are placed on the subsea BOP stack to reduce hydraulic response times and provide a hydraulic power supply in case of interruption of surface communication. Hydraulic fluid capacity of an accumulator may drop to 15% of its capacity on the surface and even less, depending on the water depth. The reason for this is that the nitrogen gas does not behave like an ideal gas as we go to very deep water, due to high hydrostatic pressure at that water depth. The possibility of the use of springs and heavy weights as possible replacements for nitrogen in the structure of accumulators will be discussed in this paper. High hydrostatic pressure of deepwater will not affect the functionality of these mechanical accumulators. Transferring bank of accumulators to the surface and connecting them to the BOP with properly sized and rigid pipes can decrease response time to an acceptable level to satisfy regulations and standards. This idea can be considered as an alternative solution too. We have to include the hydrostatic pressure of water in the usable fluid calculation. A low pressure tank located on the sea-floor can dismiss the negative effect of high hydrostatic pressure of seawater. This alternative idea is also discussed. Using a column of high density fluid as the accumulator system is another alternative method that is presented in this paper and should be investigated further for such application.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846996825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846996825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 1

SP - 32

EP - 48

BT - International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China 2006 - Sustainable Growth for oil and Gas

ER -