Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study

Mahmood AL-Rasheed, Austin Brell, Saleh Al-Qaffas, Jaber Al Marri

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper focuses on improving PL safety by providing a methodology for detecting, locating rupture and reducing emergency response time. Pipeline rupture can be due to many factors such as such as corrosion, third party damage or over pressure in the system. In the oil & gas Industries, there are several rupture prevention measures to monitor and ensure safe pipeline operation. These include regular inspection, corrosion program and ongoing maintenance program. However, in few cases where we have rupture, the consequences can be serious. Over the last few years, major oil and gas industries experienced several major incidents related to pipeline ruptures. In all of these incidents, a common contributing factor to the problem is the time required to report and isolate rupture location. Therefore, to mitigate rupture consequences, the proposed solution is to help Pipelines Operations to reduce the response time to isolate rupture either through Manual or Automatic intervention. This paper considers current pipeline operation emergency response plan individual steps and look for area of improvements to reduce response time. In this paper, a comprehensive pipeline hydraulics transient analysis was performed for liquid and gas services addressing single and network pipeline systems to improve pipeline operating companies' emergency response plan during pipeline ruptures. The pipeline protection break set points for gas, liquid, single and network example cases are also presented in detail in the report. Implementation of study findings and recommendations will mitigate the harmful Consequences of a pipeline Rupture by MINIMIZING TIME to ISOLATE Ruptured Pipeline.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2010
EventPipeline Simulation Interest Group Annual Meeting, PSIG 2010 - Bonita Springs, United States
Duration: 11 May 201014 May 2010

Other

OtherPipeline Simulation Interest Group Annual Meeting, PSIG 2010
CountryUnited States
CityBonita Springs
Period11/5/1014/5/10

Fingerprint

rupture
mitigation
Pipelines
gas industry
Gas industry
corrosion
pipeline protection
Corrosion
liquid
overpressure
oil industry
Liquids
gas
Gases
Transient analysis
Inspection
safety
hydraulics
Hydraulics
damage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

AL-Rasheed, M., Brell, A., Al-Qaffas, S., & Al Marri, J. (2010). Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study. Paper presented at Pipeline Simulation Interest Group Annual Meeting, PSIG 2010, Bonita Springs, United States.

Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study. / AL-Rasheed, Mahmood; Brell, Austin; Al-Qaffas, Saleh; Al Marri, Jaber.

2010. Paper presented at Pipeline Simulation Interest Group Annual Meeting, PSIG 2010, Bonita Springs, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

AL-Rasheed, M, Brell, A, Al-Qaffas, S & Al Marri, J 2010, 'Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study' Paper presented at Pipeline Simulation Interest Group Annual Meeting, PSIG 2010, Bonita Springs, United States, 11/5/10 - 14/5/10, .
AL-Rasheed M, Brell A, Al-Qaffas S, Al Marri J. Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study. 2010. Paper presented at Pipeline Simulation Interest Group Annual Meeting, PSIG 2010, Bonita Springs, United States.
AL-Rasheed, Mahmood ; Brell, Austin ; Al-Qaffas, Saleh ; Al Marri, Jaber. / Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study. Paper presented at Pipeline Simulation Interest Group Annual Meeting, PSIG 2010, Bonita Springs, United States.
@conference{8aa511bd2c4e49b9b4b9021e532e2d89,
title = "Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study",
abstract = "This paper focuses on improving PL safety by providing a methodology for detecting, locating rupture and reducing emergency response time. Pipeline rupture can be due to many factors such as such as corrosion, third party damage or over pressure in the system. In the oil & gas Industries, there are several rupture prevention measures to monitor and ensure safe pipeline operation. These include regular inspection, corrosion program and ongoing maintenance program. However, in few cases where we have rupture, the consequences can be serious. Over the last few years, major oil and gas industries experienced several major incidents related to pipeline ruptures. In all of these incidents, a common contributing factor to the problem is the time required to report and isolate rupture location. Therefore, to mitigate rupture consequences, the proposed solution is to help Pipelines Operations to reduce the response time to isolate rupture either through Manual or Automatic intervention. This paper considers current pipeline operation emergency response plan individual steps and look for area of improvements to reduce response time. In this paper, a comprehensive pipeline hydraulics transient analysis was performed for liquid and gas services addressing single and network pipeline systems to improve pipeline operating companies' emergency response plan during pipeline ruptures. The pipeline protection break set points for gas, liquid, single and network example cases are also presented in detail in the report. Implementation of study findings and recommendations will mitigate the harmful Consequences of a pipeline Rupture by MINIMIZING TIME to ISOLATE Ruptured Pipeline.",
author = "Mahmood AL-Rasheed and Austin Brell and Saleh Al-Qaffas and {Al Marri}, Jaber",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
note = "Pipeline Simulation Interest Group Annual Meeting, PSIG 2010 ; Conference date: 11-05-2010 Through 14-05-2010",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study

AU - AL-Rasheed, Mahmood

AU - Brell, Austin

AU - Al-Qaffas, Saleh

AU - Al Marri, Jaber

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - This paper focuses on improving PL safety by providing a methodology for detecting, locating rupture and reducing emergency response time. Pipeline rupture can be due to many factors such as such as corrosion, third party damage or over pressure in the system. In the oil & gas Industries, there are several rupture prevention measures to monitor and ensure safe pipeline operation. These include regular inspection, corrosion program and ongoing maintenance program. However, in few cases where we have rupture, the consequences can be serious. Over the last few years, major oil and gas industries experienced several major incidents related to pipeline ruptures. In all of these incidents, a common contributing factor to the problem is the time required to report and isolate rupture location. Therefore, to mitigate rupture consequences, the proposed solution is to help Pipelines Operations to reduce the response time to isolate rupture either through Manual or Automatic intervention. This paper considers current pipeline operation emergency response plan individual steps and look for area of improvements to reduce response time. In this paper, a comprehensive pipeline hydraulics transient analysis was performed for liquid and gas services addressing single and network pipeline systems to improve pipeline operating companies' emergency response plan during pipeline ruptures. The pipeline protection break set points for gas, liquid, single and network example cases are also presented in detail in the report. Implementation of study findings and recommendations will mitigate the harmful Consequences of a pipeline Rupture by MINIMIZING TIME to ISOLATE Ruptured Pipeline.

AB - This paper focuses on improving PL safety by providing a methodology for detecting, locating rupture and reducing emergency response time. Pipeline rupture can be due to many factors such as such as corrosion, third party damage or over pressure in the system. In the oil & gas Industries, there are several rupture prevention measures to monitor and ensure safe pipeline operation. These include regular inspection, corrosion program and ongoing maintenance program. However, in few cases where we have rupture, the consequences can be serious. Over the last few years, major oil and gas industries experienced several major incidents related to pipeline ruptures. In all of these incidents, a common contributing factor to the problem is the time required to report and isolate rupture location. Therefore, to mitigate rupture consequences, the proposed solution is to help Pipelines Operations to reduce the response time to isolate rupture either through Manual or Automatic intervention. This paper considers current pipeline operation emergency response plan individual steps and look for area of improvements to reduce response time. In this paper, a comprehensive pipeline hydraulics transient analysis was performed for liquid and gas services addressing single and network pipeline systems to improve pipeline operating companies' emergency response plan during pipeline ruptures. The pipeline protection break set points for gas, liquid, single and network example cases are also presented in detail in the report. Implementation of study findings and recommendations will mitigate the harmful Consequences of a pipeline Rupture by MINIMIZING TIME to ISOLATE Ruptured Pipeline.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996612797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996612797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

ER -