Performance modeling of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) seawater desalination process using a commercial composite membrane

Jung Gil Lee, Young Deuk Kim, Woo Seung Kim, Lijo Francis, Gary Amy, Noreddine Ghaffour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the development of a rigorous theoretical model to predict the transmembrane flux of a flat sheet hydrophobic composite membrane, comprising both an active layer of polytetrafluoroethylene and a scrim-backing support layer of polypropylene, in the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) process. An integrated model includes the mass, momentum, species and energy balances for both retentate and permeate flows, coupled with the mass transfer of water vapor through the composite membrane and the heat transfer across the membrane and through the boundary layers adjacent to the membrane surfaces. Experimental results and model predictions for permeate flux and performance ratio are compared and shown to be in good agreement. The permeate flux through the composite layer can be ignored in the consideration of mass transfer pathways at the composite membrane. The effect of the surface porosity and the thickness of active and support layers on the process performance of composite membrane has also been studied. Among these parameters, surface porosity is identified to be the main factor significantly influencing the permeate flux and performance ratio, while the relative influence of the surface porosity on the performance ratio is less than that on flux.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-95
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Membrane Science
Volume478
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Distillation
distillation
Composite membranes
Seawater
Desalination
Fluxes
membranes
Membranes
composite materials
Porosity
Mass transfer
porosity
mass transfer
Polypropylenes
Theoretical Models
Steam
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Energy balance
Polytetrafluoroethylenes
Water vapor

Keywords

  • Composite membrane
  • Desalination
  • Direct contact membrane distillation
  • Heat and mass transfer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Biochemistry
  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Performance modeling of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) seawater desalination process using a commercial composite membrane. / Lee, Jung Gil; Kim, Young Deuk; Kim, Woo Seung; Francis, Lijo; Amy, Gary; Ghaffour, Noreddine.

In: Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 478, 05.03.2015, p. 85-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Jung Gil ; Kim, Young Deuk ; Kim, Woo Seung ; Francis, Lijo ; Amy, Gary ; Ghaffour, Noreddine. / Performance modeling of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) seawater desalination process using a commercial composite membrane. In: Journal of Membrane Science. 2015 ; Vol. 478. pp. 85-95.
@article{08a5e43923db425cbeb623692152cd64,
title = "Performance modeling of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) seawater desalination process using a commercial composite membrane",
abstract = "This paper presents the development of a rigorous theoretical model to predict the transmembrane flux of a flat sheet hydrophobic composite membrane, comprising both an active layer of polytetrafluoroethylene and a scrim-backing support layer of polypropylene, in the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) process. An integrated model includes the mass, momentum, species and energy balances for both retentate and permeate flows, coupled with the mass transfer of water vapor through the composite membrane and the heat transfer across the membrane and through the boundary layers adjacent to the membrane surfaces. Experimental results and model predictions for permeate flux and performance ratio are compared and shown to be in good agreement. The permeate flux through the composite layer can be ignored in the consideration of mass transfer pathways at the composite membrane. The effect of the surface porosity and the thickness of active and support layers on the process performance of composite membrane has also been studied. Among these parameters, surface porosity is identified to be the main factor significantly influencing the permeate flux and performance ratio, while the relative influence of the surface porosity on the performance ratio is less than that on flux.",
keywords = "Composite membrane, Desalination, Direct contact membrane distillation, Heat and mass transfer",
author = "Lee, {Jung Gil} and Kim, {Young Deuk} and Kim, {Woo Seung} and Lijo Francis and Gary Amy and Noreddine Ghaffour",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.053",
language = "English",
volume = "478",
pages = "85--95",
journal = "Journal of Membrane Science",
issn = "0376-7388",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance modeling of direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) seawater desalination process using a commercial composite membrane

AU - Lee, Jung Gil

AU - Kim, Young Deuk

AU - Kim, Woo Seung

AU - Francis, Lijo

AU - Amy, Gary

AU - Ghaffour, Noreddine

PY - 2015/3/5

Y1 - 2015/3/5

N2 - This paper presents the development of a rigorous theoretical model to predict the transmembrane flux of a flat sheet hydrophobic composite membrane, comprising both an active layer of polytetrafluoroethylene and a scrim-backing support layer of polypropylene, in the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) process. An integrated model includes the mass, momentum, species and energy balances for both retentate and permeate flows, coupled with the mass transfer of water vapor through the composite membrane and the heat transfer across the membrane and through the boundary layers adjacent to the membrane surfaces. Experimental results and model predictions for permeate flux and performance ratio are compared and shown to be in good agreement. The permeate flux through the composite layer can be ignored in the consideration of mass transfer pathways at the composite membrane. The effect of the surface porosity and the thickness of active and support layers on the process performance of composite membrane has also been studied. Among these parameters, surface porosity is identified to be the main factor significantly influencing the permeate flux and performance ratio, while the relative influence of the surface porosity on the performance ratio is less than that on flux.

AB - This paper presents the development of a rigorous theoretical model to predict the transmembrane flux of a flat sheet hydrophobic composite membrane, comprising both an active layer of polytetrafluoroethylene and a scrim-backing support layer of polypropylene, in the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) process. An integrated model includes the mass, momentum, species and energy balances for both retentate and permeate flows, coupled with the mass transfer of water vapor through the composite membrane and the heat transfer across the membrane and through the boundary layers adjacent to the membrane surfaces. Experimental results and model predictions for permeate flux and performance ratio are compared and shown to be in good agreement. The permeate flux through the composite layer can be ignored in the consideration of mass transfer pathways at the composite membrane. The effect of the surface porosity and the thickness of active and support layers on the process performance of composite membrane has also been studied. Among these parameters, surface porosity is identified to be the main factor significantly influencing the permeate flux and performance ratio, while the relative influence of the surface porosity on the performance ratio is less than that on flux.

KW - Composite membrane

KW - Desalination

KW - Direct contact membrane distillation

KW - Heat and mass transfer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921494373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921494373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.053

DO - 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.12.053

M3 - Article

VL - 478

SP - 85

EP - 95

JO - Journal of Membrane Science

JF - Journal of Membrane Science

SN - 0376-7388

ER -