“Peace, Peace, but there is No Peace”

A Critique of Christian Pacifist Communitarianism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The communal elements of Christianity are of increasing concern to religious thinkers. Indeed, for some religious thinkers, the importance of community is paramount in Christian belief and practice, especially as these communitarian views interact and enhance Christian pacifism. The community of Christians as the “peaceable kingdom” becomes the core element of Christian life. But is this pacifist communitarian Christianity tenable? In this article, I will argue that pacifist communitarianism leads to unexpected and objectionable consequences. Specifically, I will consider the views of John Howard Yoder and Stanley Hauerwas. By explicating the weaknesses of their pacifist views, most especially on the issue of coercion and the notion of “Constantinianism,” I will show that both thinkers tend toward a view of Christian separatism vis-à-vis the secular world. Both thinkers' systems present problems in communicating truth to those not already in the community. Finally, their communitarian views conflict with their pacifism, in the end requiring those not within the community to act as if they were members.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-435
Number of pages25
JournalPolitics and Religion
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

peace
pacifism
Christianity
community
separatism
Pacifist
Communitarianism
Peace
Thinkers
present
Communitarian
Religion
Pacifism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

“Peace, Peace, but there is No Peace” : A Critique of Christian Pacifist Communitarianism. / Gray, Phillip.

In: Politics and Religion, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2008, p. 411-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f330773271140229e914406f01efaa8,
title = "“Peace, Peace, but there is No Peace”: A Critique of Christian Pacifist Communitarianism",
abstract = "The communal elements of Christianity are of increasing concern to religious thinkers. Indeed, for some religious thinkers, the importance of community is paramount in Christian belief and practice, especially as these communitarian views interact and enhance Christian pacifism. The community of Christians as the “peaceable kingdom” becomes the core element of Christian life. But is this pacifist communitarian Christianity tenable? In this article, I will argue that pacifist communitarianism leads to unexpected and objectionable consequences. Specifically, I will consider the views of John Howard Yoder and Stanley Hauerwas. By explicating the weaknesses of their pacifist views, most especially on the issue of coercion and the notion of “Constantinianism,” I will show that both thinkers tend toward a view of Christian separatism vis-{\`a}-vis the secular world. Both thinkers' systems present problems in communicating truth to those not already in the community. Finally, their communitarian views conflict with their pacifism, in the end requiring those not within the community to act as if they were members.",
author = "Phillip Gray",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1017/S1755048308000394",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "411--435",
journal = "Politics and Religion",
issn = "1755-0483",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Peace, Peace, but there is No Peace”

T2 - A Critique of Christian Pacifist Communitarianism

AU - Gray, Phillip

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The communal elements of Christianity are of increasing concern to religious thinkers. Indeed, for some religious thinkers, the importance of community is paramount in Christian belief and practice, especially as these communitarian views interact and enhance Christian pacifism. The community of Christians as the “peaceable kingdom” becomes the core element of Christian life. But is this pacifist communitarian Christianity tenable? In this article, I will argue that pacifist communitarianism leads to unexpected and objectionable consequences. Specifically, I will consider the views of John Howard Yoder and Stanley Hauerwas. By explicating the weaknesses of their pacifist views, most especially on the issue of coercion and the notion of “Constantinianism,” I will show that both thinkers tend toward a view of Christian separatism vis-à-vis the secular world. Both thinkers' systems present problems in communicating truth to those not already in the community. Finally, their communitarian views conflict with their pacifism, in the end requiring those not within the community to act as if they were members.

AB - The communal elements of Christianity are of increasing concern to religious thinkers. Indeed, for some religious thinkers, the importance of community is paramount in Christian belief and practice, especially as these communitarian views interact and enhance Christian pacifism. The community of Christians as the “peaceable kingdom” becomes the core element of Christian life. But is this pacifist communitarian Christianity tenable? In this article, I will argue that pacifist communitarianism leads to unexpected and objectionable consequences. Specifically, I will consider the views of John Howard Yoder and Stanley Hauerwas. By explicating the weaknesses of their pacifist views, most especially on the issue of coercion and the notion of “Constantinianism,” I will show that both thinkers tend toward a view of Christian separatism vis-à-vis the secular world. Both thinkers' systems present problems in communicating truth to those not already in the community. Finally, their communitarian views conflict with their pacifism, in the end requiring those not within the community to act as if they were members.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011514458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011514458&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1755048308000394

DO - 10.1017/S1755048308000394

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 411

EP - 435

JO - Politics and Religion

JF - Politics and Religion

SN - 1755-0483

IS - 3

ER -