Numerical simulation of aerosol deposition from turbulent flows using three-dimensional RANS and les turbulence models

Yingjie Tang, Bing Guo, Devesh Ranjan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of particle deposition from turbulent flows in a vertical straight pipe were carried out, using the STAR-CCM+ v5.04 CFD package. The highlight of the study is the development of a post-processing approach for quantitatively assessing the accuracy of the Lagrangian particle tracking scheme. Three Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and a large eddy simulation (LES) model were employed in the simulations, in conjunction with two wall treatment schemes and several near-wall mesh conditions. The particle deposition velocity was obtained based on the CFD simulation results, and compared to the experimental results. In postprocessing, a "particle responsiveness factor," defined as the ratio of particle mean square velocity fluctuation to fluid mean square velocity fluctuation for the wall-adjacent cells, was quantified using an Eulerian particle transport formulation. The particle responsiveness factor of the CFD simulations was then compared with that obtained using an empirical equation. The most accurate aerosol deposition results were obtained with a fine near-wall mesh (y+ ≈1) and resolved near-wall flow (no wall function). The LES model and the Reynolds stress model (RSM) produced the most accurate deposition velocity results, but the computation time of the former was up to ten times longer than that of the latter. The lower accuracy of the isotropic RANS models was attributed to their overprediction of the near-wall turbulence intensity gradient, and less accurate particle tracking as suggested by the particle responsiveness factor. The particle responsiveness factor, introduced for the first time in this study, was shown to be a useful index for evaluating accuracy of the Lagrangian particle tracking scheme due to its independence of specific knowledge of CFD algorithm and coding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)174-186
Number of pages13
JournalEngineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Turbulence Model
Aerosol
Turbulence models
Navier-Stokes
Turbulent Flow
Turbulent flow
Aerosols
Computational fluid dynamics
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Numerical Simulation
Three-dimensional
Computer simulation
Particle Tracking
Large eddy simulation
Dynamic Simulation
Large Eddy Simulation
Post-processing
Wall function
Mean Square
Wall flow

Keywords

  • Aerosol deposition
  • LES
  • RANS
  • Turbulence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Modelling and Simulation

Cite this

@article{4fd4fc593fbd4a0cb4caf017ac1efa8e,
title = "Numerical simulation of aerosol deposition from turbulent flows using three-dimensional RANS and les turbulence models",
abstract = "In this study, three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of particle deposition from turbulent flows in a vertical straight pipe were carried out, using the STAR-CCM+ v5.04 CFD package. The highlight of the study is the development of a post-processing approach for quantitatively assessing the accuracy of the Lagrangian particle tracking scheme. Three Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and a large eddy simulation (LES) model were employed in the simulations, in conjunction with two wall treatment schemes and several near-wall mesh conditions. The particle deposition velocity was obtained based on the CFD simulation results, and compared to the experimental results. In postprocessing, a {"}particle responsiveness factor,{"} defined as the ratio of particle mean square velocity fluctuation to fluid mean square velocity fluctuation for the wall-adjacent cells, was quantified using an Eulerian particle transport formulation. The particle responsiveness factor of the CFD simulations was then compared with that obtained using an empirical equation. The most accurate aerosol deposition results were obtained with a fine near-wall mesh (y+ ≈1) and resolved near-wall flow (no wall function). The LES model and the Reynolds stress model (RSM) produced the most accurate deposition velocity results, but the computation time of the former was up to ten times longer than that of the latter. The lower accuracy of the isotropic RANS models was attributed to their overprediction of the near-wall turbulence intensity gradient, and less accurate particle tracking as suggested by the particle responsiveness factor. The particle responsiveness factor, introduced for the first time in this study, was shown to be a useful index for evaluating accuracy of the Lagrangian particle tracking scheme due to its independence of specific knowledge of CFD algorithm and coding.",
keywords = "Aerosol deposition, LES, RANS, Turbulence",
author = "Yingjie Tang and Bing Guo and Devesh Ranjan",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/19942060.2015.1004818",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "174--186",
journal = "Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics",
issn = "1994-2060",
publisher = "Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical simulation of aerosol deposition from turbulent flows using three-dimensional RANS and les turbulence models

AU - Tang, Yingjie

AU - Guo, Bing

AU - Ranjan, Devesh

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this study, three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of particle deposition from turbulent flows in a vertical straight pipe were carried out, using the STAR-CCM+ v5.04 CFD package. The highlight of the study is the development of a post-processing approach for quantitatively assessing the accuracy of the Lagrangian particle tracking scheme. Three Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and a large eddy simulation (LES) model were employed in the simulations, in conjunction with two wall treatment schemes and several near-wall mesh conditions. The particle deposition velocity was obtained based on the CFD simulation results, and compared to the experimental results. In postprocessing, a "particle responsiveness factor," defined as the ratio of particle mean square velocity fluctuation to fluid mean square velocity fluctuation for the wall-adjacent cells, was quantified using an Eulerian particle transport formulation. The particle responsiveness factor of the CFD simulations was then compared with that obtained using an empirical equation. The most accurate aerosol deposition results were obtained with a fine near-wall mesh (y+ ≈1) and resolved near-wall flow (no wall function). The LES model and the Reynolds stress model (RSM) produced the most accurate deposition velocity results, but the computation time of the former was up to ten times longer than that of the latter. The lower accuracy of the isotropic RANS models was attributed to their overprediction of the near-wall turbulence intensity gradient, and less accurate particle tracking as suggested by the particle responsiveness factor. The particle responsiveness factor, introduced for the first time in this study, was shown to be a useful index for evaluating accuracy of the Lagrangian particle tracking scheme due to its independence of specific knowledge of CFD algorithm and coding.

AB - In this study, three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of particle deposition from turbulent flows in a vertical straight pipe were carried out, using the STAR-CCM+ v5.04 CFD package. The highlight of the study is the development of a post-processing approach for quantitatively assessing the accuracy of the Lagrangian particle tracking scheme. Three Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and a large eddy simulation (LES) model were employed in the simulations, in conjunction with two wall treatment schemes and several near-wall mesh conditions. The particle deposition velocity was obtained based on the CFD simulation results, and compared to the experimental results. In postprocessing, a "particle responsiveness factor," defined as the ratio of particle mean square velocity fluctuation to fluid mean square velocity fluctuation for the wall-adjacent cells, was quantified using an Eulerian particle transport formulation. The particle responsiveness factor of the CFD simulations was then compared with that obtained using an empirical equation. The most accurate aerosol deposition results were obtained with a fine near-wall mesh (y+ ≈1) and resolved near-wall flow (no wall function). The LES model and the Reynolds stress model (RSM) produced the most accurate deposition velocity results, but the computation time of the former was up to ten times longer than that of the latter. The lower accuracy of the isotropic RANS models was attributed to their overprediction of the near-wall turbulence intensity gradient, and less accurate particle tracking as suggested by the particle responsiveness factor. The particle responsiveness factor, introduced for the first time in this study, was shown to be a useful index for evaluating accuracy of the Lagrangian particle tracking scheme due to its independence of specific knowledge of CFD algorithm and coding.

KW - Aerosol deposition

KW - LES

KW - RANS

KW - Turbulence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956547017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956547017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19942060.2015.1004818

DO - 10.1080/19942060.2015.1004818

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 174

EP - 186

JO - Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics

JF - Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics

SN - 1994-2060

IS - 1

ER -