Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for Mobility Control in Enhanced Oil Recovery

Qian Sun, Na Zhang, Zhaomin Li, Yuhe Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Foam stabilized by a surfactant has been used successfully for mobility control during enhanced oil recovery processes, but the stability of the foam limits its application. Aqueous foams prepared from dispersions of partially hydrophobic silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) anionic surfactant were studied and the injection behavior of foams stabilized by a solution of SDS or dispersion of SiO2/SDS were analyzed for comparison. Foam stability increased with increasing nanoparticle concentration although the feasibility of producing a foam (foamability) followed the opposite trend. The surface tension and interfacial dilatational rheological properties were affected by the addition of SiO2 nanoparticles. When 0.05 wt % SiO2 was added to the solution of SDS, the system's dilatational elasticity increased significantly, but not the dilatational viscosity. The sweep efficiency to dead end was very small, and the SiO2/SDS foam could displace more residual oil in the dead end than that in the SDS foam. The differential pressure could increase to 0.58 MPa when SDS foam was injected, but for the SiO2/SDS foam it could increase to 1.7 MPa. The SiO2/SDS foam exhibited better profile control performance than that of the SDS foam. When subsequent water was injected for 3.5 pore volumes, the flow rate of the high-permeability sand pack could still be maintained at 1.0 mL min−1, which suggested that the SiO2/SDS foam had a better resistance to water flushing. Additionally, the foam volume should also be considered, especially for a SiO2 concentration of >1.5 wt %. SiO2/SDS foam can reduce the residual oil saturation clearly, and the enhanced oil recovery and final oil recovery can reach 36.90 and 69.57 %, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1084-1096
Number of pages13
JournalEnergy Technology
Volume4
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Foams
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Nanoparticles
Recovery
Oils
Anionic surfactants
Dispersions
Surface tension
Water
Elasticity
Surface active agents
Sand
Silica
Flow rate
Viscosity

Keywords

  • foams
  • nanoparticles
  • oil recovery
  • rheological properties
  • surfactants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)

Cite this

Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for Mobility Control in Enhanced Oil Recovery. / Sun, Qian; Zhang, Na; Li, Zhaomin; Wang, Yuhe.

In: Energy Technology, Vol. 4, No. 9, 01.09.2016, p. 1084-1096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sun, Qian ; Zhang, Na ; Li, Zhaomin ; Wang, Yuhe. / Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for Mobility Control in Enhanced Oil Recovery. In: Energy Technology. 2016 ; Vol. 4, No. 9. pp. 1084-1096.
@article{9c25bb9de9134f17a5437ae778203bfb,
title = "Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for Mobility Control in Enhanced Oil Recovery",
abstract = "Foam stabilized by a surfactant has been used successfully for mobility control during enhanced oil recovery processes, but the stability of the foam limits its application. Aqueous foams prepared from dispersions of partially hydrophobic silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) anionic surfactant were studied and the injection behavior of foams stabilized by a solution of SDS or dispersion of SiO2/SDS were analyzed for comparison. Foam stability increased with increasing nanoparticle concentration although the feasibility of producing a foam (foamability) followed the opposite trend. The surface tension and interfacial dilatational rheological properties were affected by the addition of SiO2 nanoparticles. When 0.05 wt {\%} SiO2 was added to the solution of SDS, the system's dilatational elasticity increased significantly, but not the dilatational viscosity. The sweep efficiency to dead end was very small, and the SiO2/SDS foam could displace more residual oil in the dead end than that in the SDS foam. The differential pressure could increase to 0.58 MPa when SDS foam was injected, but for the SiO2/SDS foam it could increase to 1.7 MPa. The SiO2/SDS foam exhibited better profile control performance than that of the SDS foam. When subsequent water was injected for 3.5 pore volumes, the flow rate of the high-permeability sand pack could still be maintained at 1.0 mL min−1, which suggested that the SiO2/SDS foam had a better resistance to water flushing. Additionally, the foam volume should also be considered, especially for a SiO2 concentration of >1.5 wt {\%}. SiO2/SDS foam can reduce the residual oil saturation clearly, and the enhanced oil recovery and final oil recovery can reach 36.90 and 69.57 {\%}, respectively.",
keywords = "foams, nanoparticles, oil recovery, rheological properties, surfactants",
author = "Qian Sun and Na Zhang and Zhaomin Li and Yuhe Wang",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ente.201600093",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1084--1096",
journal = "Energy Technology",
issn = "2194-4288",
publisher = "Wiley - VCH Verlag GmbH & CO. KGaA",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nanoparticle-Stabilized Foam for Mobility Control in Enhanced Oil Recovery

AU - Sun, Qian

AU - Zhang, Na

AU - Li, Zhaomin

AU - Wang, Yuhe

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Foam stabilized by a surfactant has been used successfully for mobility control during enhanced oil recovery processes, but the stability of the foam limits its application. Aqueous foams prepared from dispersions of partially hydrophobic silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) anionic surfactant were studied and the injection behavior of foams stabilized by a solution of SDS or dispersion of SiO2/SDS were analyzed for comparison. Foam stability increased with increasing nanoparticle concentration although the feasibility of producing a foam (foamability) followed the opposite trend. The surface tension and interfacial dilatational rheological properties were affected by the addition of SiO2 nanoparticles. When 0.05 wt % SiO2 was added to the solution of SDS, the system's dilatational elasticity increased significantly, but not the dilatational viscosity. The sweep efficiency to dead end was very small, and the SiO2/SDS foam could displace more residual oil in the dead end than that in the SDS foam. The differential pressure could increase to 0.58 MPa when SDS foam was injected, but for the SiO2/SDS foam it could increase to 1.7 MPa. The SiO2/SDS foam exhibited better profile control performance than that of the SDS foam. When subsequent water was injected for 3.5 pore volumes, the flow rate of the high-permeability sand pack could still be maintained at 1.0 mL min−1, which suggested that the SiO2/SDS foam had a better resistance to water flushing. Additionally, the foam volume should also be considered, especially for a SiO2 concentration of >1.5 wt %. SiO2/SDS foam can reduce the residual oil saturation clearly, and the enhanced oil recovery and final oil recovery can reach 36.90 and 69.57 %, respectively.

AB - Foam stabilized by a surfactant has been used successfully for mobility control during enhanced oil recovery processes, but the stability of the foam limits its application. Aqueous foams prepared from dispersions of partially hydrophobic silicon dioxide (SiO2) nanoparticles and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) anionic surfactant were studied and the injection behavior of foams stabilized by a solution of SDS or dispersion of SiO2/SDS were analyzed for comparison. Foam stability increased with increasing nanoparticle concentration although the feasibility of producing a foam (foamability) followed the opposite trend. The surface tension and interfacial dilatational rheological properties were affected by the addition of SiO2 nanoparticles. When 0.05 wt % SiO2 was added to the solution of SDS, the system's dilatational elasticity increased significantly, but not the dilatational viscosity. The sweep efficiency to dead end was very small, and the SiO2/SDS foam could displace more residual oil in the dead end than that in the SDS foam. The differential pressure could increase to 0.58 MPa when SDS foam was injected, but for the SiO2/SDS foam it could increase to 1.7 MPa. The SiO2/SDS foam exhibited better profile control performance than that of the SDS foam. When subsequent water was injected for 3.5 pore volumes, the flow rate of the high-permeability sand pack could still be maintained at 1.0 mL min−1, which suggested that the SiO2/SDS foam had a better resistance to water flushing. Additionally, the foam volume should also be considered, especially for a SiO2 concentration of >1.5 wt %. SiO2/SDS foam can reduce the residual oil saturation clearly, and the enhanced oil recovery and final oil recovery can reach 36.90 and 69.57 %, respectively.

KW - foams

KW - nanoparticles

KW - oil recovery

KW - rheological properties

KW - surfactants

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991529240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991529240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ente.201600093

DO - 10.1002/ente.201600093

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1084

EP - 1096

JO - Energy Technology

JF - Energy Technology

SN - 2194-4288

IS - 9

ER -