Multi-effect boiling systems from an energy viewpoint

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

All desalting systems consume energy, either thermal or mechanical or both. In the search for energy-efficient desalting systems, it is clear that the reverse osmosis (RO) desalting system is more efficient than the widely used multi-stage flash (MSF) desalting system. For seawater in the Gulf area, as an example, RO consumes about 5 kWh/m3 of mechanical work, while MSF desalting units consume about 4 kWh/m3 pumping energy, besides thermal energy. The thermal energy input to large MSF units is in the range of 250-300 kJ/kg, and is usually in the form of slightly superheated steam extracted from steam turbines at about 2-3 bar. The equivalent work of this thermal energy is in the range of 17 kWh/m3. The conventional multi-effect boiling (MEB) desalting system uses about half of the MSF pumping energy, and almost the same amount of thermal energy used by the MSF, if both have the same gain ratio. However, a recent trend of using low-temperature MEB (LTME) allows the use of low temperature (in the range of 70°C) steam as heat source, and consequently of low exergy and low equivalent work. This can bring the LTME consumed equivalent mechanical energy close to that consumed by the efficient RO system. The conventional multieffect desalting system was revisited to show that thermal energy input to LTME is low, and can bring the equivalent mechanical energy, and thus the consumed fuel energy, to low values close to those of a seawater RO desalting system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-39
Number of pages18
JournalDesalination
Volume194
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jun 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Salt removal
Boiling liquids
Thermal energy
Reverse osmosis
energy
Steam
Seawater
Temperature
effect
Exergy
pumping
Steam turbines
seawater
exergy
heat source
turbine

Keywords

  • Equivalent mechanical energy
  • Falling film evaporator
  • Gain ratio
  • Multi-effect boiling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Multi-effect boiling systems from an energy viewpoint. / Darwish, M. A.; Al-Juwayhel, Faisal; Abdulraheim, Hassan K.

In: Desalination, Vol. 194, No. 1-3, 10.06.2006, p. 22-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f60a254333be4dcfa849a0ec898d3ee7,
title = "Multi-effect boiling systems from an energy viewpoint",
abstract = "All desalting systems consume energy, either thermal or mechanical or both. In the search for energy-efficient desalting systems, it is clear that the reverse osmosis (RO) desalting system is more efficient than the widely used multi-stage flash (MSF) desalting system. For seawater in the Gulf area, as an example, RO consumes about 5 kWh/m3 of mechanical work, while MSF desalting units consume about 4 kWh/m3 pumping energy, besides thermal energy. The thermal energy input to large MSF units is in the range of 250-300 kJ/kg, and is usually in the form of slightly superheated steam extracted from steam turbines at about 2-3 bar. The equivalent work of this thermal energy is in the range of 17 kWh/m3. The conventional multi-effect boiling (MEB) desalting system uses about half of the MSF pumping energy, and almost the same amount of thermal energy used by the MSF, if both have the same gain ratio. However, a recent trend of using low-temperature MEB (LTME) allows the use of low temperature (in the range of 70°C) steam as heat source, and consequently of low exergy and low equivalent work. This can bring the LTME consumed equivalent mechanical energy close to that consumed by the efficient RO system. The conventional multieffect desalting system was revisited to show that thermal energy input to LTME is low, and can bring the equivalent mechanical energy, and thus the consumed fuel energy, to low values close to those of a seawater RO desalting system.",
keywords = "Equivalent mechanical energy, Falling film evaporator, Gain ratio, Multi-effect boiling",
author = "Darwish, {M. A.} and Faisal Al-Juwayhel and Abdulraheim, {Hassan K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.desal.2005.08.029",
language = "English",
volume = "194",
pages = "22--39",
journal = "Desalination",
issn = "0011-9164",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-effect boiling systems from an energy viewpoint

AU - Darwish, M. A.

AU - Al-Juwayhel, Faisal

AU - Abdulraheim, Hassan K.

PY - 2006/6/10

Y1 - 2006/6/10

N2 - All desalting systems consume energy, either thermal or mechanical or both. In the search for energy-efficient desalting systems, it is clear that the reverse osmosis (RO) desalting system is more efficient than the widely used multi-stage flash (MSF) desalting system. For seawater in the Gulf area, as an example, RO consumes about 5 kWh/m3 of mechanical work, while MSF desalting units consume about 4 kWh/m3 pumping energy, besides thermal energy. The thermal energy input to large MSF units is in the range of 250-300 kJ/kg, and is usually in the form of slightly superheated steam extracted from steam turbines at about 2-3 bar. The equivalent work of this thermal energy is in the range of 17 kWh/m3. The conventional multi-effect boiling (MEB) desalting system uses about half of the MSF pumping energy, and almost the same amount of thermal energy used by the MSF, if both have the same gain ratio. However, a recent trend of using low-temperature MEB (LTME) allows the use of low temperature (in the range of 70°C) steam as heat source, and consequently of low exergy and low equivalent work. This can bring the LTME consumed equivalent mechanical energy close to that consumed by the efficient RO system. The conventional multieffect desalting system was revisited to show that thermal energy input to LTME is low, and can bring the equivalent mechanical energy, and thus the consumed fuel energy, to low values close to those of a seawater RO desalting system.

AB - All desalting systems consume energy, either thermal or mechanical or both. In the search for energy-efficient desalting systems, it is clear that the reverse osmosis (RO) desalting system is more efficient than the widely used multi-stage flash (MSF) desalting system. For seawater in the Gulf area, as an example, RO consumes about 5 kWh/m3 of mechanical work, while MSF desalting units consume about 4 kWh/m3 pumping energy, besides thermal energy. The thermal energy input to large MSF units is in the range of 250-300 kJ/kg, and is usually in the form of slightly superheated steam extracted from steam turbines at about 2-3 bar. The equivalent work of this thermal energy is in the range of 17 kWh/m3. The conventional multi-effect boiling (MEB) desalting system uses about half of the MSF pumping energy, and almost the same amount of thermal energy used by the MSF, if both have the same gain ratio. However, a recent trend of using low-temperature MEB (LTME) allows the use of low temperature (in the range of 70°C) steam as heat source, and consequently of low exergy and low equivalent work. This can bring the LTME consumed equivalent mechanical energy close to that consumed by the efficient RO system. The conventional multieffect desalting system was revisited to show that thermal energy input to LTME is low, and can bring the equivalent mechanical energy, and thus the consumed fuel energy, to low values close to those of a seawater RO desalting system.

KW - Equivalent mechanical energy

KW - Falling film evaporator

KW - Gain ratio

KW - Multi-effect boiling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646820696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646820696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.desal.2005.08.029

DO - 10.1016/j.desal.2005.08.029

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33646820696

VL - 194

SP - 22

EP - 39

JO - Desalination

JF - Desalination

SN - 0011-9164

IS - 1-3

ER -