Multi-domain resilience

Can i share protection resources with my competitors?

Tibor Cinkler, János Szigeti, Laszlo Gyarmati

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Internet consists of a collection of more than 21000 domains called Autonomous Systems (AS) operated mostly under different authorities (operators/providers) that although co-operate over different geographical areas, they compete in a country or other area. Today BGP is the de facto standard for exchanging reachability information over the domain boundaries and for inter-domain routing. The GMPLS controlled optical beared networks are expected to have similar architecture, however, more information has to be carried for TE, resilience and QoS purposes. Therefore, extensions of BGP and of PNNI as well as the PCE have been proposed. Still in all cases emerges the question of protection shareability. For dedicated protection it is enough to know the topology of the network to be able to calculate disjoint paths. However, to be able to perform sharing of protection resources (shared protection) it is not enough to know the topology, but it is mandatory to know exact working and protection path pairs for all the demands, since protection paths can share a certain resource only if there is no such a pair of working paths that contain any element from the same Shared Risk Group (SRG). This can be checked within a domain where the full topology and link-state information is flooded, however, over the domain boundaries for security and scalability reasons no such information is being spread. In this paper we propose using two techniques that do not require flooding the information on working and protection paths while they still allow sharing of resources. These two techniques are the Multi-Domain p-Cycles (MD-PC) and the Multi-Domain Multi-Path Routing with Protection (MD-MPP). After explaining the principles of these methods we give illustrative results.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007
Pages138-141
Number of pages4
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2007
Externally publishedYes
Event2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007 - Rome, Italy
Duration: 1 Jul 20075 Jul 2007

Other

Other2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007
CountryItaly
CityRome
Period1/7/075/7/07

Fingerprint

resilience
Topology
resources
Fiber optic networks
Scalability
Quality of service
Internet
Group

Keywords

  • Dedicated and shared protection
  • Multi-domain
  • Multi-operator
  • Multi-path protection
  • Multi-path routing
  • Multi-provider
  • P-cycles
  • Resilience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Communication

Cite this

Cinkler, T., Szigeti, J., & Gyarmati, L. (2007). Multi-domain resilience: Can i share protection resources with my competitors? In Proceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007 (Vol. 3, pp. 138-141). [4296265] https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2007.4296265

Multi-domain resilience : Can i share protection resources with my competitors? / Cinkler, Tibor; Szigeti, János; Gyarmati, Laszlo.

Proceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007. Vol. 3 2007. p. 138-141 4296265.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Cinkler, T, Szigeti, J & Gyarmati, L 2007, Multi-domain resilience: Can i share protection resources with my competitors? in Proceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007. vol. 3, 4296265, pp. 138-141, 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007, Rome, Italy, 1/7/07. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2007.4296265
Cinkler T, Szigeti J, Gyarmati L. Multi-domain resilience: Can i share protection resources with my competitors? In Proceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007. Vol. 3. 2007. p. 138-141. 4296265 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2007.4296265
Cinkler, Tibor ; Szigeti, János ; Gyarmati, Laszlo. / Multi-domain resilience : Can i share protection resources with my competitors?. Proceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007. Vol. 3 2007. pp. 138-141
@inproceedings{d8020f2c73a84486837a11046a5c3c10,
title = "Multi-domain resilience: Can i share protection resources with my competitors?",
abstract = "The Internet consists of a collection of more than 21000 domains called Autonomous Systems (AS) operated mostly under different authorities (operators/providers) that although co-operate over different geographical areas, they compete in a country or other area. Today BGP is the de facto standard for exchanging reachability information over the domain boundaries and for inter-domain routing. The GMPLS controlled optical beared networks are expected to have similar architecture, however, more information has to be carried for TE, resilience and QoS purposes. Therefore, extensions of BGP and of PNNI as well as the PCE have been proposed. Still in all cases emerges the question of protection shareability. For dedicated protection it is enough to know the topology of the network to be able to calculate disjoint paths. However, to be able to perform sharing of protection resources (shared protection) it is not enough to know the topology, but it is mandatory to know exact working and protection path pairs for all the demands, since protection paths can share a certain resource only if there is no such a pair of working paths that contain any element from the same Shared Risk Group (SRG). This can be checked within a domain where the full topology and link-state information is flooded, however, over the domain boundaries for security and scalability reasons no such information is being spread. In this paper we propose using two techniques that do not require flooding the information on working and protection paths while they still allow sharing of resources. These two techniques are the Multi-Domain p-Cycles (MD-PC) and the Multi-Domain Multi-Path Routing with Protection (MD-MPP). After explaining the principles of these methods we give illustrative results.",
keywords = "Dedicated and shared protection, Multi-domain, Multi-operator, Multi-path protection, Multi-path routing, Multi-provider, P-cycles, Resilience",
author = "Tibor Cinkler and J{\'a}nos Szigeti and Laszlo Gyarmati",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/ICTON.2007.4296265",
language = "English",
isbn = "142441248X",
volume = "3",
pages = "138--141",
booktitle = "Proceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Multi-domain resilience

T2 - Can i share protection resources with my competitors?

AU - Cinkler, Tibor

AU - Szigeti, János

AU - Gyarmati, Laszlo

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - The Internet consists of a collection of more than 21000 domains called Autonomous Systems (AS) operated mostly under different authorities (operators/providers) that although co-operate over different geographical areas, they compete in a country or other area. Today BGP is the de facto standard for exchanging reachability information over the domain boundaries and for inter-domain routing. The GMPLS controlled optical beared networks are expected to have similar architecture, however, more information has to be carried for TE, resilience and QoS purposes. Therefore, extensions of BGP and of PNNI as well as the PCE have been proposed. Still in all cases emerges the question of protection shareability. For dedicated protection it is enough to know the topology of the network to be able to calculate disjoint paths. However, to be able to perform sharing of protection resources (shared protection) it is not enough to know the topology, but it is mandatory to know exact working and protection path pairs for all the demands, since protection paths can share a certain resource only if there is no such a pair of working paths that contain any element from the same Shared Risk Group (SRG). This can be checked within a domain where the full topology and link-state information is flooded, however, over the domain boundaries for security and scalability reasons no such information is being spread. In this paper we propose using two techniques that do not require flooding the information on working and protection paths while they still allow sharing of resources. These two techniques are the Multi-Domain p-Cycles (MD-PC) and the Multi-Domain Multi-Path Routing with Protection (MD-MPP). After explaining the principles of these methods we give illustrative results.

AB - The Internet consists of a collection of more than 21000 domains called Autonomous Systems (AS) operated mostly under different authorities (operators/providers) that although co-operate over different geographical areas, they compete in a country or other area. Today BGP is the de facto standard for exchanging reachability information over the domain boundaries and for inter-domain routing. The GMPLS controlled optical beared networks are expected to have similar architecture, however, more information has to be carried for TE, resilience and QoS purposes. Therefore, extensions of BGP and of PNNI as well as the PCE have been proposed. Still in all cases emerges the question of protection shareability. For dedicated protection it is enough to know the topology of the network to be able to calculate disjoint paths. However, to be able to perform sharing of protection resources (shared protection) it is not enough to know the topology, but it is mandatory to know exact working and protection path pairs for all the demands, since protection paths can share a certain resource only if there is no such a pair of working paths that contain any element from the same Shared Risk Group (SRG). This can be checked within a domain where the full topology and link-state information is flooded, however, over the domain boundaries for security and scalability reasons no such information is being spread. In this paper we propose using two techniques that do not require flooding the information on working and protection paths while they still allow sharing of resources. These two techniques are the Multi-Domain p-Cycles (MD-PC) and the Multi-Domain Multi-Path Routing with Protection (MD-MPP). After explaining the principles of these methods we give illustrative results.

KW - Dedicated and shared protection

KW - Multi-domain

KW - Multi-operator

KW - Multi-path protection

KW - Multi-path routing

KW - Multi-provider

KW - P-cycles

KW - Resilience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48349090333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48349090333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ICTON.2007.4296265

DO - 10.1109/ICTON.2007.4296265

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 142441248X

SN - 9781424412488

VL - 3

SP - 138

EP - 141

BT - Proceedings of 2007 9th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2007

ER -