Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling

Shaza Zaghlool, Christopher L. Wyatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) can be used to quantify cognitive function in individuals as effective connectivity. However, ambiguity among subjects in the number and location of discernible active regions prevents all candidate models from being compared in all subjects, precluding the use of DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool. This paper proposes a solution to this problem by treating missing regions in the first-level analysis as missing data, and performing estimation of the time course associated with any missing region using one of four candidate methods: zero-filling, average-filling, noise-filling using a fixed stochastic process, or one estimated using expectation-maximization. The effect of this estimation scheme was analyzed by treating it as a preprocessing step to DCM and observing the resulting effects on model evidence. Simulation studies show that estimation using expectation-maximization yields the highest classification accuracy using a simple loss function and highest model evidence, relative to other methods. This result held for various dataset sizes and varying numbers of model choice. In real data, application to Go/No-Go and Simon tasks allowed computation of signals from the missing nodes and the consequent computation of model evidence in all subjects compared to 62 and 48 percent respectively if no preprocessing was performed. These results demonstrate the face validity of the preprocessing scheme and open the possibility of using single-subject DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool.

Original languageEnglish
Article number191
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Issue number8 JUL
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Stochastic Processes
Reproducibility of Results
Cognition
Noise
Datasets

Keywords

  • Dynamic causal modeling
  • Expectation-maximization
  • Missing data

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling. / Zaghlool, Shaza; Wyatt, Christopher L.

In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, No. 8 JUL, 191, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c2bbbab45b5c43e8b98d6704decfa034,
title = "Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling",
abstract = "Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) can be used to quantify cognitive function in individuals as effective connectivity. However, ambiguity among subjects in the number and location of discernible active regions prevents all candidate models from being compared in all subjects, precluding the use of DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool. This paper proposes a solution to this problem by treating missing regions in the first-level analysis as missing data, and performing estimation of the time course associated with any missing region using one of four candidate methods: zero-filling, average-filling, noise-filling using a fixed stochastic process, or one estimated using expectation-maximization. The effect of this estimation scheme was analyzed by treating it as a preprocessing step to DCM and observing the resulting effects on model evidence. Simulation studies show that estimation using expectation-maximization yields the highest classification accuracy using a simple loss function and highest model evidence, relative to other methods. This result held for various dataset sizes and varying numbers of model choice. In real data, application to Go/No-Go and Simon tasks allowed computation of signals from the missing nodes and the consequent computation of model evidence in all subjects compared to 62 and 48 percent respectively if no preprocessing was performed. These results demonstrate the face validity of the preprocessing scheme and open the possibility of using single-subject DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool.",
keywords = "Dynamic causal modeling, Expectation-maximization, Missing data",
author = "Shaza Zaghlool and Wyatt, {Christopher L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fnins.2014.00191",
language = "English",
journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-4548",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "8 JUL",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing data estimation in fMRI dynamic causal modeling

AU - Zaghlool, Shaza

AU - Wyatt, Christopher L.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) can be used to quantify cognitive function in individuals as effective connectivity. However, ambiguity among subjects in the number and location of discernible active regions prevents all candidate models from being compared in all subjects, precluding the use of DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool. This paper proposes a solution to this problem by treating missing regions in the first-level analysis as missing data, and performing estimation of the time course associated with any missing region using one of four candidate methods: zero-filling, average-filling, noise-filling using a fixed stochastic process, or one estimated using expectation-maximization. The effect of this estimation scheme was analyzed by treating it as a preprocessing step to DCM and observing the resulting effects on model evidence. Simulation studies show that estimation using expectation-maximization yields the highest classification accuracy using a simple loss function and highest model evidence, relative to other methods. This result held for various dataset sizes and varying numbers of model choice. In real data, application to Go/No-Go and Simon tasks allowed computation of signals from the missing nodes and the consequent computation of model evidence in all subjects compared to 62 and 48 percent respectively if no preprocessing was performed. These results demonstrate the face validity of the preprocessing scheme and open the possibility of using single-subject DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool.

AB - Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) can be used to quantify cognitive function in individuals as effective connectivity. However, ambiguity among subjects in the number and location of discernible active regions prevents all candidate models from being compared in all subjects, precluding the use of DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool. This paper proposes a solution to this problem by treating missing regions in the first-level analysis as missing data, and performing estimation of the time course associated with any missing region using one of four candidate methods: zero-filling, average-filling, noise-filling using a fixed stochastic process, or one estimated using expectation-maximization. The effect of this estimation scheme was analyzed by treating it as a preprocessing step to DCM and observing the resulting effects on model evidence. Simulation studies show that estimation using expectation-maximization yields the highest classification accuracy using a simple loss function and highest model evidence, relative to other methods. This result held for various dataset sizes and varying numbers of model choice. In real data, application to Go/No-Go and Simon tasks allowed computation of signals from the missing nodes and the consequent computation of model evidence in all subjects compared to 62 and 48 percent respectively if no preprocessing was performed. These results demonstrate the face validity of the preprocessing scheme and open the possibility of using single-subject DCM as an individual cognitive phenotyping tool.

KW - Dynamic causal modeling

KW - Expectation-maximization

KW - Missing data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905963239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905963239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2014.00191

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2014.00191

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84905963239

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

SN - 1662-4548

IS - 8 JUL

M1 - 191

ER -