Is twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? a cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look

Zhe Liu, Ingmar Weber

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rise in popularity of Twitter has led to a debate on its impact on public opinions. The optimists foresee an increase in online participation and democratization due to social media’s personal and interactive nature. Cyberpessimists, on the other hand, explain how social media can lead to selective exposure and can be used as a disguise for those in power to disseminate biased information. To investigate this debate empirically, we evaluate Twitter as a public sphere using four metrics: equality, diversity, reciprocity and quality. Using these measurements, we analyze the communication patterns between individuals of different hierarchical levels and ideologies. We do this within the context of three diverse conflicts: Israel-Palestine, US Democrats-Republicans, and FC Barcelona-Real Madrid. In all cases, we collect data around a central pair of Twitter accounts representing the two main parties. Our results show in a quantitative manner that Twitter is not an ideal public sphere for democratic conversations and that hierarchical effects are part of the reason why it is not.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages336-347
Number of pages12
Volume8851
ISBN (Print)9783319137339
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014
Event6th International Conference on Social Informatics, SocInfo 2014 - Barcelona, Spain
Duration: 11 Nov 201413 Nov 2014

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume8851
ISSN (Print)03029743
ISSN (Electronic)16113349

Other

Other6th International Conference on Social Informatics, SocInfo 2014
CountrySpain
CityBarcelona
Period11/11/1413/11/14

Fingerprint

Social Media
Reciprocity
Biased
Equality
Metric
Evaluate
Communication
Conflict
Participation
Context

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Political communication
  • Public sphere
  • Social stratification
  • Twitter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Theoretical Computer Science

Cite this

Liu, Z., & Weber, I. (2014). Is twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? a cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8851, pp. 336-347). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 8851). Springer Verlag.

Is twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? a cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look. / Liu, Zhe; Weber, Ingmar.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 8851 Springer Verlag, 2014. p. 336-347 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 8851).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Liu, Z & Weber, I 2014, Is twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? a cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). vol. 8851, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 8851, Springer Verlag, pp. 336-347, 6th International Conference on Social Informatics, SocInfo 2014, Barcelona, Spain, 11/11/14.
Liu Z, Weber I. Is twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? a cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 8851. Springer Verlag. 2014. p. 336-347. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
Liu, Zhe ; Weber, Ingmar. / Is twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? a cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 8851 Springer Verlag, 2014. pp. 336-347 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
@inproceedings{6d6f6a9e7992437e9581a3f629aa6503,
title = "Is twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? a cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look",
abstract = "The rise in popularity of Twitter has led to a debate on its impact on public opinions. The optimists foresee an increase in online participation and democratization due to social media’s personal and interactive nature. Cyberpessimists, on the other hand, explain how social media can lead to selective exposure and can be used as a disguise for those in power to disseminate biased information. To investigate this debate empirically, we evaluate Twitter as a public sphere using four metrics: equality, diversity, reciprocity and quality. Using these measurements, we analyze the communication patterns between individuals of different hierarchical levels and ideologies. We do this within the context of three diverse conflicts: Israel-Palestine, US Democrats-Republicans, and FC Barcelona-Real Madrid. In all cases, we collect data around a central pair of Twitter accounts representing the two main parties. Our results show in a quantitative manner that Twitter is not an ideal public sphere for democratic conversations and that hierarchical effects are part of the reason why it is not.",
keywords = "Conflict, Political communication, Public sphere, Social stratification, Twitter",
author = "Zhe Liu and Ingmar Weber",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319137339",
volume = "8851",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "336--347",
booktitle = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Is twitter a public sphere for online conflicts? a cross-ideological and cross-hierarchical look

AU - Liu, Zhe

AU - Weber, Ingmar

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The rise in popularity of Twitter has led to a debate on its impact on public opinions. The optimists foresee an increase in online participation and democratization due to social media’s personal and interactive nature. Cyberpessimists, on the other hand, explain how social media can lead to selective exposure and can be used as a disguise for those in power to disseminate biased information. To investigate this debate empirically, we evaluate Twitter as a public sphere using four metrics: equality, diversity, reciprocity and quality. Using these measurements, we analyze the communication patterns between individuals of different hierarchical levels and ideologies. We do this within the context of three diverse conflicts: Israel-Palestine, US Democrats-Republicans, and FC Barcelona-Real Madrid. In all cases, we collect data around a central pair of Twitter accounts representing the two main parties. Our results show in a quantitative manner that Twitter is not an ideal public sphere for democratic conversations and that hierarchical effects are part of the reason why it is not.

AB - The rise in popularity of Twitter has led to a debate on its impact on public opinions. The optimists foresee an increase in online participation and democratization due to social media’s personal and interactive nature. Cyberpessimists, on the other hand, explain how social media can lead to selective exposure and can be used as a disguise for those in power to disseminate biased information. To investigate this debate empirically, we evaluate Twitter as a public sphere using four metrics: equality, diversity, reciprocity and quality. Using these measurements, we analyze the communication patterns between individuals of different hierarchical levels and ideologies. We do this within the context of three diverse conflicts: Israel-Palestine, US Democrats-Republicans, and FC Barcelona-Real Madrid. In all cases, we collect data around a central pair of Twitter accounts representing the two main parties. Our results show in a quantitative manner that Twitter is not an ideal public sphere for democratic conversations and that hierarchical effects are part of the reason why it is not.

KW - Conflict

KW - Political communication

KW - Public sphere

KW - Social stratification

KW - Twitter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914144331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914144331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84914144331

SN - 9783319137339

VL - 8851

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 336

EP - 347

BT - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -