Abstract
Background. The incidence of Type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide and diabetes is four times more common among ethnic minority groups than among the general Caucasian population. This study reflects on the specific issues of engaging people and evaluating interventions through written questionnaires within older ethnic minority groups. Methods. The original protocol set out to evaluate an adapted version of the X-PERT® patient program http://www.xpert-diabetes.org.uk/ using questionnaires and interviews. Results. Questionnaires, even verbally completed, were unsuccessful and difficult to administer as participants found the questionnaire structure and design difficult to follow and did not perceive any benefit to completing the questionnaires. The benefits of attending the course were also poorly understood by participants and in many cases people participated in coming to the course as a favour to the researcher. Engaging participants required word of mouth and the involvement of active members of the community. Conclusion. Peer led courses and their evaluation in older ethnic minority communities needs a very different approach for that in younger Caucasian patients. A structured approached to evaluation (favoured by western educational system) is inappropriate. Engaging participants is difficult and the employment of local well known people is essential.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 64 |
Journal | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Volume | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Oct 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Epidemiology
- Health Informatics
Cite this
Intervention, recruitment and evaluation challenges in the Bangladeshi community : Experience from a peer lead educational course. / Choudhury, Sopna; Brophy, S.; Fareedi, M. A.; Zaman, B.; Ahmed, P.; Williams, D. R.R.
In: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 8, 64, 28.10.2008.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Intervention, recruitment and evaluation challenges in the Bangladeshi community
T2 - Experience from a peer lead educational course
AU - Choudhury, Sopna
AU - Brophy, S.
AU - Fareedi, M. A.
AU - Zaman, B.
AU - Ahmed, P.
AU - Williams, D. R.R.
PY - 2008/10/28
Y1 - 2008/10/28
N2 - Background. The incidence of Type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide and diabetes is four times more common among ethnic minority groups than among the general Caucasian population. This study reflects on the specific issues of engaging people and evaluating interventions through written questionnaires within older ethnic minority groups. Methods. The original protocol set out to evaluate an adapted version of the X-PERT® patient program http://www.xpert-diabetes.org.uk/ using questionnaires and interviews. Results. Questionnaires, even verbally completed, were unsuccessful and difficult to administer as participants found the questionnaire structure and design difficult to follow and did not perceive any benefit to completing the questionnaires. The benefits of attending the course were also poorly understood by participants and in many cases people participated in coming to the course as a favour to the researcher. Engaging participants required word of mouth and the involvement of active members of the community. Conclusion. Peer led courses and their evaluation in older ethnic minority communities needs a very different approach for that in younger Caucasian patients. A structured approached to evaluation (favoured by western educational system) is inappropriate. Engaging participants is difficult and the employment of local well known people is essential.
AB - Background. The incidence of Type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide and diabetes is four times more common among ethnic minority groups than among the general Caucasian population. This study reflects on the specific issues of engaging people and evaluating interventions through written questionnaires within older ethnic minority groups. Methods. The original protocol set out to evaluate an adapted version of the X-PERT® patient program http://www.xpert-diabetes.org.uk/ using questionnaires and interviews. Results. Questionnaires, even verbally completed, were unsuccessful and difficult to administer as participants found the questionnaire structure and design difficult to follow and did not perceive any benefit to completing the questionnaires. The benefits of attending the course were also poorly understood by participants and in many cases people participated in coming to the course as a favour to the researcher. Engaging participants required word of mouth and the involvement of active members of the community. Conclusion. Peer led courses and their evaluation in older ethnic minority communities needs a very different approach for that in younger Caucasian patients. A structured approached to evaluation (favoured by western educational system) is inappropriate. Engaging participants is difficult and the employment of local well known people is essential.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54349107966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54349107966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2288-8-64
DO - 10.1186/1471-2288-8-64
M3 - Article
C2 - 18844992
AN - SCOPUS:54349107966
VL - 8
JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology
JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology
SN - 1471-2288
M1 - 64
ER -