Interpretation of the skin factor for predicting the perforation-induced formation damage in reservoirs

Azizur Rahaman, T. Heidrick, B. Fleck, M. Koksal, M. R. Islam

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This study has established that permeability is decreased in the range of 30%-75% due to the implement of the conventional method of perforation by shooting (PS) technique compared to the openhole completion. As a result, a new perforation technique called perforation by drilling (PD) has been proposed in this paper. To simulate a perforated completion, cylindrical sand samples (0.0572 m OD) with varying strength and porosity were prepared. These samples were perforated (0.0136 m ID) by the PS, PD and Casting techniques. Perforations created by the Casting techniques are considered the ideal openhole perforation tunnel. An important measure of flow efficiency or productivity of perforation completions can be referred to as skin factor (s). In this paper, the performance of the PS, PD, and Casting technique was measured in terms of skin factor. Experimental results show that the s in the PD and PS techniques is 0.20 and 17 respectively, for the ratio of rd/rp is 1.5. Thus, in terms of inflow efficiency the PD technique is superior compared to the PS technique.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGeothermal Resources Council Transactions - GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future
Pages283-288
Number of pages6
Volume30 I
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes
EventGRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: 10 Sep 200613 Sep 2006

Other

OtherGRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period10/9/0613/9/06

Fingerprint

perforation
skin
Drilling
Skin
damage
Casting
drilling
Tunnels
Sand
Porosity
Productivity
productivity
sands
tunnels

Keywords

  • Formation damage
  • Formation permeability
  • Inflow performance
  • Perforation tunnel
  • Skin factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Geophysics

Cite this

Rahaman, A., Heidrick, T., Fleck, B., Koksal, M., & Islam, M. R. (2006). Interpretation of the skin factor for predicting the perforation-induced formation damage in reservoirs. In Geothermal Resources Council Transactions - GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future (Vol. 30 I, pp. 283-288)

Interpretation of the skin factor for predicting the perforation-induced formation damage in reservoirs. / Rahaman, Azizur; Heidrick, T.; Fleck, B.; Koksal, M.; Islam, M. R.

Geothermal Resources Council Transactions - GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future. Vol. 30 I 2006. p. 283-288.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Rahaman, A, Heidrick, T, Fleck, B, Koksal, M & Islam, MR 2006, Interpretation of the skin factor for predicting the perforation-induced formation damage in reservoirs. in Geothermal Resources Council Transactions - GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future. vol. 30 I, pp. 283-288, GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future, San Diego, CA, United States, 10/9/06.
Rahaman A, Heidrick T, Fleck B, Koksal M, Islam MR. Interpretation of the skin factor for predicting the perforation-induced formation damage in reservoirs. In Geothermal Resources Council Transactions - GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future. Vol. 30 I. 2006. p. 283-288
Rahaman, Azizur ; Heidrick, T. ; Fleck, B. ; Koksal, M. ; Islam, M. R. / Interpretation of the skin factor for predicting the perforation-induced formation damage in reservoirs. Geothermal Resources Council Transactions - GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future. Vol. 30 I 2006. pp. 283-288
@inproceedings{94b06cc9e9e044a8a6862899125141db,
title = "Interpretation of the skin factor for predicting the perforation-induced formation damage in reservoirs",
abstract = "This study has established that permeability is decreased in the range of 30{\%}-75{\%} due to the implement of the conventional method of perforation by shooting (PS) technique compared to the openhole completion. As a result, a new perforation technique called perforation by drilling (PD) has been proposed in this paper. To simulate a perforated completion, cylindrical sand samples (0.0572 m OD) with varying strength and porosity were prepared. These samples were perforated (0.0136 m ID) by the PS, PD and Casting techniques. Perforations created by the Casting techniques are considered the ideal openhole perforation tunnel. An important measure of flow efficiency or productivity of perforation completions can be referred to as skin factor (s). In this paper, the performance of the PS, PD, and Casting technique was measured in terms of skin factor. Experimental results show that the s in the PD and PS techniques is 0.20 and 17 respectively, for the ratio of rd/rp is 1.5. Thus, in terms of inflow efficiency the PD technique is superior compared to the PS technique.",
keywords = "Formation damage, Formation permeability, Inflow performance, Perforation tunnel, Skin factor",
author = "Azizur Rahaman and T. Heidrick and B. Fleck and M. Koksal and Islam, {M. R.}",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
isbn = "1604230010",
volume = "30 I",
pages = "283--288",
booktitle = "Geothermal Resources Council Transactions - GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Interpretation of the skin factor for predicting the perforation-induced formation damage in reservoirs

AU - Rahaman, Azizur

AU - Heidrick, T.

AU - Fleck, B.

AU - Koksal, M.

AU - Islam, M. R.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This study has established that permeability is decreased in the range of 30%-75% due to the implement of the conventional method of perforation by shooting (PS) technique compared to the openhole completion. As a result, a new perforation technique called perforation by drilling (PD) has been proposed in this paper. To simulate a perforated completion, cylindrical sand samples (0.0572 m OD) with varying strength and porosity were prepared. These samples were perforated (0.0136 m ID) by the PS, PD and Casting techniques. Perforations created by the Casting techniques are considered the ideal openhole perforation tunnel. An important measure of flow efficiency or productivity of perforation completions can be referred to as skin factor (s). In this paper, the performance of the PS, PD, and Casting technique was measured in terms of skin factor. Experimental results show that the s in the PD and PS techniques is 0.20 and 17 respectively, for the ratio of rd/rp is 1.5. Thus, in terms of inflow efficiency the PD technique is superior compared to the PS technique.

AB - This study has established that permeability is decreased in the range of 30%-75% due to the implement of the conventional method of perforation by shooting (PS) technique compared to the openhole completion. As a result, a new perforation technique called perforation by drilling (PD) has been proposed in this paper. To simulate a perforated completion, cylindrical sand samples (0.0572 m OD) with varying strength and porosity were prepared. These samples were perforated (0.0136 m ID) by the PS, PD and Casting techniques. Perforations created by the Casting techniques are considered the ideal openhole perforation tunnel. An important measure of flow efficiency or productivity of perforation completions can be referred to as skin factor (s). In this paper, the performance of the PS, PD, and Casting technique was measured in terms of skin factor. Experimental results show that the s in the PD and PS techniques is 0.20 and 17 respectively, for the ratio of rd/rp is 1.5. Thus, in terms of inflow efficiency the PD technique is superior compared to the PS technique.

KW - Formation damage

KW - Formation permeability

KW - Inflow performance

KW - Perforation tunnel

KW - Skin factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548187191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548187191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 1604230010

SN - 9781604230017

VL - 30 I

SP - 283

EP - 288

BT - Geothermal Resources Council Transactions - GRC 2006 Annual Meeting: Geothermal Resources-Securing Our Energy Future

ER -