Integrating Life Cycle Assessment with Green Building and Product Rating Systems

North American Perspective

W. O. Collinge, C. L. Thiel, N. A. Campion, Sami Al-Gahmdi, C. L. Woloschin, K. Soratana, A. E. Landis, M. M. Bilec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development of green building rating systems (GBRS) and sustainability metrics for buildings, including building products, is reviewed from a North American perspective. The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) system and the Living Building Challenge (LBC) are highlighted as primary examples of different levels of GBRS. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is introduced as a preferred method of quantifying sustainability, and its integration into current GBRS is examined a prominent building example. Two example applications of LCA to building products associated with GBRS - carpet and roof membranes - are provided. In the first example, conventional carpet was compared with carpet meeting the standards of the LBC's materials exclusion criteria (Red List, via the Declare product labeling system). In the second example, LCA was applied to both the manufacture and use phases of roof membrane alternatives for a building retrofit project, one of which would have aided in achieving LEED certification. The Declare-listed products did not perform better in every LCA impact category, and the GBRS-preferred roof system performed more poorly in all LCA impact categories, while suggesting the need for additional LCA categories. Both examples help to illustrate the complexity and tradeoffs encountered while integrating the quantitative perspective of LCA and the qualitative perspective of GBRS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)662-669
Number of pages8
JournalProcedia Engineering
Volume118
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Life cycle
Roofs
Sustainable development
Membranes
Labeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Integrating Life Cycle Assessment with Green Building and Product Rating Systems : North American Perspective. / Collinge, W. O.; Thiel, C. L.; Campion, N. A.; Al-Gahmdi, Sami; Woloschin, C. L.; Soratana, K.; Landis, A. E.; Bilec, M. M.

In: Procedia Engineering, Vol. 118, 2015, p. 662-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Collinge, WO, Thiel, CL, Campion, NA, Al-Gahmdi, S, Woloschin, CL, Soratana, K, Landis, AE & Bilec, MM 2015, 'Integrating Life Cycle Assessment with Green Building and Product Rating Systems: North American Perspective', Procedia Engineering, vol. 118, pp. 662-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.500
Collinge, W. O. ; Thiel, C. L. ; Campion, N. A. ; Al-Gahmdi, Sami ; Woloschin, C. L. ; Soratana, K. ; Landis, A. E. ; Bilec, M. M. / Integrating Life Cycle Assessment with Green Building and Product Rating Systems : North American Perspective. In: Procedia Engineering. 2015 ; Vol. 118. pp. 662-669.
@article{314a6ef9e9f64a6fb16a20cab284146a,
title = "Integrating Life Cycle Assessment with Green Building and Product Rating Systems: North American Perspective",
abstract = "The development of green building rating systems (GBRS) and sustainability metrics for buildings, including building products, is reviewed from a North American perspective. The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) system and the Living Building Challenge (LBC) are highlighted as primary examples of different levels of GBRS. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is introduced as a preferred method of quantifying sustainability, and its integration into current GBRS is examined a prominent building example. Two example applications of LCA to building products associated with GBRS - carpet and roof membranes - are provided. In the first example, conventional carpet was compared with carpet meeting the standards of the LBC's materials exclusion criteria (Red List, via the Declare product labeling system). In the second example, LCA was applied to both the manufacture and use phases of roof membrane alternatives for a building retrofit project, one of which would have aided in achieving LEED certification. The Declare-listed products did not perform better in every LCA impact category, and the GBRS-preferred roof system performed more poorly in all LCA impact categories, while suggesting the need for additional LCA categories. Both examples help to illustrate the complexity and tradeoffs encountered while integrating the quantitative perspective of LCA and the qualitative perspective of GBRS.",
author = "Collinge, {W. O.} and Thiel, {C. L.} and Campion, {N. A.} and Sami Al-Gahmdi and Woloschin, {C. L.} and K. Soratana and Landis, {A. E.} and Bilec, {M. M.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.500",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "662--669",
journal = "Procedia Engineering",
issn = "1877-7058",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating Life Cycle Assessment with Green Building and Product Rating Systems

T2 - North American Perspective

AU - Collinge, W. O.

AU - Thiel, C. L.

AU - Campion, N. A.

AU - Al-Gahmdi, Sami

AU - Woloschin, C. L.

AU - Soratana, K.

AU - Landis, A. E.

AU - Bilec, M. M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The development of green building rating systems (GBRS) and sustainability metrics for buildings, including building products, is reviewed from a North American perspective. The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) system and the Living Building Challenge (LBC) are highlighted as primary examples of different levels of GBRS. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is introduced as a preferred method of quantifying sustainability, and its integration into current GBRS is examined a prominent building example. Two example applications of LCA to building products associated with GBRS - carpet and roof membranes - are provided. In the first example, conventional carpet was compared with carpet meeting the standards of the LBC's materials exclusion criteria (Red List, via the Declare product labeling system). In the second example, LCA was applied to both the manufacture and use phases of roof membrane alternatives for a building retrofit project, one of which would have aided in achieving LEED certification. The Declare-listed products did not perform better in every LCA impact category, and the GBRS-preferred roof system performed more poorly in all LCA impact categories, while suggesting the need for additional LCA categories. Both examples help to illustrate the complexity and tradeoffs encountered while integrating the quantitative perspective of LCA and the qualitative perspective of GBRS.

AB - The development of green building rating systems (GBRS) and sustainability metrics for buildings, including building products, is reviewed from a North American perspective. The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) system and the Living Building Challenge (LBC) are highlighted as primary examples of different levels of GBRS. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is introduced as a preferred method of quantifying sustainability, and its integration into current GBRS is examined a prominent building example. Two example applications of LCA to building products associated with GBRS - carpet and roof membranes - are provided. In the first example, conventional carpet was compared with carpet meeting the standards of the LBC's materials exclusion criteria (Red List, via the Declare product labeling system). In the second example, LCA was applied to both the manufacture and use phases of roof membrane alternatives for a building retrofit project, one of which would have aided in achieving LEED certification. The Declare-listed products did not perform better in every LCA impact category, and the GBRS-preferred roof system performed more poorly in all LCA impact categories, while suggesting the need for additional LCA categories. Both examples help to illustrate the complexity and tradeoffs encountered while integrating the quantitative perspective of LCA and the qualitative perspective of GBRS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948439155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948439155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.500

DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.500

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 662

EP - 669

JO - Procedia Engineering

JF - Procedia Engineering

SN - 1877-7058

ER -