Identifying measures used for assessing quality of youtube videos with patient health information

A review of current literature

Elia Gabarron, Luis Fernandez, Manuel Armayones, Annie Y S Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recent publications on YouTube have advocated its potential for patient education. However, a reliable description of what could be considered quality information for patient education on YouTube is missing. Objective: To identify topics associated with the concept of quality information for patient education on YouTube in the scientific literature. Methods: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PsychINFO. Abstract selection was first conducted by two independent reviewers; discrepancies were discussed in a second abstract review with two additional independent reviewers. Full text of selected papers were analyzed looking for concepts, definitions, and topics used by its authors that focused on the quality of information on YouTube for patient education. Results: In total, 456 abstracts were extracted and 13 papers meeting eligibility criteria were analyzed. Concepts identified related to quality of information for patient education are categorized as expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures. These include (in descending order): (1) quality of content in 10/13 (77%), (2) view count in 9/13 (69%), (3) health professional opinion in 8/13 (62%), (4) adequate length or duration in 6/13 (46%), (5) public ratings in 5/13 (39%), (6) adequate title, tags, and description in 5/13 (39%), (7) good description or a comprehensive narrative in 4/13 (31%), (8) evidence-based practices included in video in 4/13 (31%), (9) suitability as a teaching tool in 4/13 (31%), (10) technical quality in 4/13 (31%), (11) credentials provided in video in 4/13 (31%), (12) enough amount of content to identify its objective in 3/13 (23%), and (13) viewership share in 2/13 (15%). Conclusions: Our review confirms that the current topics linked to quality of information for patient education on YouTube are unclear and not standardized. Although expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures are used as proxies to estimate the quality of video information, caution should be applied when using YouTube for health promotion and patient educational material.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Patient Education
Health
Literature
Evidence-Based Practice
Proxy
Health Promotion
MEDLINE
Teaching

Keywords

  • Health education
  • Internet
  • Patient education
  • Quality of information
  • YouTube

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Identifying measures used for assessing quality of youtube videos with patient health information : A review of current literature. / Gabarron, Elia; Fernandez, Luis; Armayones, Manuel; Lau, Annie Y S.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, 02.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{06f35088f46047ab93671a428c1cf2ad,
title = "Identifying measures used for assessing quality of youtube videos with patient health information: A review of current literature",
abstract = "Background: Recent publications on YouTube have advocated its potential for patient education. However, a reliable description of what could be considered quality information for patient education on YouTube is missing. Objective: To identify topics associated with the concept of quality information for patient education on YouTube in the scientific literature. Methods: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PsychINFO. Abstract selection was first conducted by two independent reviewers; discrepancies were discussed in a second abstract review with two additional independent reviewers. Full text of selected papers were analyzed looking for concepts, definitions, and topics used by its authors that focused on the quality of information on YouTube for patient education. Results: In total, 456 abstracts were extracted and 13 papers meeting eligibility criteria were analyzed. Concepts identified related to quality of information for patient education are categorized as expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures. These include (in descending order): (1) quality of content in 10/13 (77{\%}), (2) view count in 9/13 (69{\%}), (3) health professional opinion in 8/13 (62{\%}), (4) adequate length or duration in 6/13 (46{\%}), (5) public ratings in 5/13 (39{\%}), (6) adequate title, tags, and description in 5/13 (39{\%}), (7) good description or a comprehensive narrative in 4/13 (31{\%}), (8) evidence-based practices included in video in 4/13 (31{\%}), (9) suitability as a teaching tool in 4/13 (31{\%}), (10) technical quality in 4/13 (31{\%}), (11) credentials provided in video in 4/13 (31{\%}), (12) enough amount of content to identify its objective in 3/13 (23{\%}), and (13) viewership share in 2/13 (15{\%}). Conclusions: Our review confirms that the current topics linked to quality of information for patient education on YouTube are unclear and not standardized. Although expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures are used as proxies to estimate the quality of video information, caution should be applied when using YouTube for health promotion and patient educational material.",
keywords = "Health education, Internet, Patient education, Quality of information, YouTube",
author = "Elia Gabarron and Luis Fernandez and Manuel Armayones and Lau, {Annie Y S}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.2196/ijmr.2465",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1438-8871",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying measures used for assessing quality of youtube videos with patient health information

T2 - A review of current literature

AU - Gabarron, Elia

AU - Fernandez, Luis

AU - Armayones, Manuel

AU - Lau, Annie Y S

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background: Recent publications on YouTube have advocated its potential for patient education. However, a reliable description of what could be considered quality information for patient education on YouTube is missing. Objective: To identify topics associated with the concept of quality information for patient education on YouTube in the scientific literature. Methods: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PsychINFO. Abstract selection was first conducted by two independent reviewers; discrepancies were discussed in a second abstract review with two additional independent reviewers. Full text of selected papers were analyzed looking for concepts, definitions, and topics used by its authors that focused on the quality of information on YouTube for patient education. Results: In total, 456 abstracts were extracted and 13 papers meeting eligibility criteria were analyzed. Concepts identified related to quality of information for patient education are categorized as expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures. These include (in descending order): (1) quality of content in 10/13 (77%), (2) view count in 9/13 (69%), (3) health professional opinion in 8/13 (62%), (4) adequate length or duration in 6/13 (46%), (5) public ratings in 5/13 (39%), (6) adequate title, tags, and description in 5/13 (39%), (7) good description or a comprehensive narrative in 4/13 (31%), (8) evidence-based practices included in video in 4/13 (31%), (9) suitability as a teaching tool in 4/13 (31%), (10) technical quality in 4/13 (31%), (11) credentials provided in video in 4/13 (31%), (12) enough amount of content to identify its objective in 3/13 (23%), and (13) viewership share in 2/13 (15%). Conclusions: Our review confirms that the current topics linked to quality of information for patient education on YouTube are unclear and not standardized. Although expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures are used as proxies to estimate the quality of video information, caution should be applied when using YouTube for health promotion and patient educational material.

AB - Background: Recent publications on YouTube have advocated its potential for patient education. However, a reliable description of what could be considered quality information for patient education on YouTube is missing. Objective: To identify topics associated with the concept of quality information for patient education on YouTube in the scientific literature. Methods: A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, and PsychINFO. Abstract selection was first conducted by two independent reviewers; discrepancies were discussed in a second abstract review with two additional independent reviewers. Full text of selected papers were analyzed looking for concepts, definitions, and topics used by its authors that focused on the quality of information on YouTube for patient education. Results: In total, 456 abstracts were extracted and 13 papers meeting eligibility criteria were analyzed. Concepts identified related to quality of information for patient education are categorized as expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures. These include (in descending order): (1) quality of content in 10/13 (77%), (2) view count in 9/13 (69%), (3) health professional opinion in 8/13 (62%), (4) adequate length or duration in 6/13 (46%), (5) public ratings in 5/13 (39%), (6) adequate title, tags, and description in 5/13 (39%), (7) good description or a comprehensive narrative in 4/13 (31%), (8) evidence-based practices included in video in 4/13 (31%), (9) suitability as a teaching tool in 4/13 (31%), (10) technical quality in 4/13 (31%), (11) credentials provided in video in 4/13 (31%), (12) enough amount of content to identify its objective in 3/13 (23%), and (13) viewership share in 2/13 (15%). Conclusions: Our review confirms that the current topics linked to quality of information for patient education on YouTube are unclear and not standardized. Although expert-driven, popularity-driven, or heuristic-driven measures are used as proxies to estimate the quality of video information, caution should be applied when using YouTube for health promotion and patient educational material.

KW - Health education

KW - Internet

KW - Patient education

KW - Quality of information

KW - YouTube

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877300104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84877300104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/ijmr.2465

DO - 10.2196/ijmr.2465

M3 - Review article

VL - 15

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1438-8871

IS - 2

ER -