Halfway between 2D and animal models: Are 3D cultures the ideal tool to study cancer-microenvironment interactions?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An area that has come to be of tremendous interest in tumor research in the last decade is the role of the microenvironment in the biology of neoplastic diseases. The tumor microenvironment (TME) comprises various cells that are collectively important for normal tissue homeostasis as well as tumor progression or regression. Seminal studies have demonstrated the role of the dialogue between cancer cells (at many sites) and the cellular component of the microenvironment in tumor progression, metastasis, and resistance to treatment. Using an appropriate system of microenvironment and tumor culture is the first step towards a better understanding of the complex interaction between cancer cells and their surroundings. Three-dimensional (3D) models have been widely described recently. However, while it is claimed that they can bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo, it is sometimes hard to decipher their advantage or limitation compared to classical two-dimensional (2D) cultures, especially given the broad number of techniques used. We present here a comprehensive review of the different 3D methods developed recently, and, secondly, we discuss the pros and cons of 3D culture compared to 2D when studying interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number181
JournalInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

animal models
Tumor Microenvironment
Tumors
Animals
tumors
Animal Models
cancer
Cells
Cellular Microenvironment
Neoplasms
progressions
interactions
Tissue homeostasis
homeostasis
three dimensional models
metastasis
biology
regression analysis
Homeostasis
Neoplasm Metastasis

Keywords

  • 2D culture
  • 3D anchorage independent culture
  • 3D culture
  • Chemoresistance
  • Tumor microenvironment
  • Tumor migration
  • Tumor proliferation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Catalysis
  • Molecular Biology
  • Spectroscopy
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this

@article{7c7e8afaa92447e1817a981b68b3ea50,
title = "Halfway between 2D and animal models: Are 3D cultures the ideal tool to study cancer-microenvironment interactions?",
abstract = "An area that has come to be of tremendous interest in tumor research in the last decade is the role of the microenvironment in the biology of neoplastic diseases. The tumor microenvironment (TME) comprises various cells that are collectively important for normal tissue homeostasis as well as tumor progression or regression. Seminal studies have demonstrated the role of the dialogue between cancer cells (at many sites) and the cellular component of the microenvironment in tumor progression, metastasis, and resistance to treatment. Using an appropriate system of microenvironment and tumor culture is the first step towards a better understanding of the complex interaction between cancer cells and their surroundings. Three-dimensional (3D) models have been widely described recently. However, while it is claimed that they can bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo, it is sometimes hard to decipher their advantage or limitation compared to classical two-dimensional (2D) cultures, especially given the broad number of techniques used. We present here a comprehensive review of the different 3D methods developed recently, and, secondly, we discuss the pros and cons of 3D culture compared to 2D when studying interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment.",
keywords = "2D culture, 3D anchorage independent culture, 3D culture, Chemoresistance, Tumor microenvironment, Tumor migration, Tumor proliferation",
author = "Jessica Hoarau and Tabrizi, {Arash Rafii} and Cyril Touboul and Jennifer Pasquier",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "18",
doi = "10.3390/ijms19010181",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "International Journal of Molecular Sciences",
issn = "1661-6596",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Halfway between 2D and animal models

T2 - Are 3D cultures the ideal tool to study cancer-microenvironment interactions?

AU - Hoarau, Jessica

AU - Tabrizi, Arash Rafii

AU - Touboul, Cyril

AU - Pasquier, Jennifer

PY - 2018/1/18

Y1 - 2018/1/18

N2 - An area that has come to be of tremendous interest in tumor research in the last decade is the role of the microenvironment in the biology of neoplastic diseases. The tumor microenvironment (TME) comprises various cells that are collectively important for normal tissue homeostasis as well as tumor progression or regression. Seminal studies have demonstrated the role of the dialogue between cancer cells (at many sites) and the cellular component of the microenvironment in tumor progression, metastasis, and resistance to treatment. Using an appropriate system of microenvironment and tumor culture is the first step towards a better understanding of the complex interaction between cancer cells and their surroundings. Three-dimensional (3D) models have been widely described recently. However, while it is claimed that they can bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo, it is sometimes hard to decipher their advantage or limitation compared to classical two-dimensional (2D) cultures, especially given the broad number of techniques used. We present here a comprehensive review of the different 3D methods developed recently, and, secondly, we discuss the pros and cons of 3D culture compared to 2D when studying interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment.

AB - An area that has come to be of tremendous interest in tumor research in the last decade is the role of the microenvironment in the biology of neoplastic diseases. The tumor microenvironment (TME) comprises various cells that are collectively important for normal tissue homeostasis as well as tumor progression or regression. Seminal studies have demonstrated the role of the dialogue between cancer cells (at many sites) and the cellular component of the microenvironment in tumor progression, metastasis, and resistance to treatment. Using an appropriate system of microenvironment and tumor culture is the first step towards a better understanding of the complex interaction between cancer cells and their surroundings. Three-dimensional (3D) models have been widely described recently. However, while it is claimed that they can bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo, it is sometimes hard to decipher their advantage or limitation compared to classical two-dimensional (2D) cultures, especially given the broad number of techniques used. We present here a comprehensive review of the different 3D methods developed recently, and, secondly, we discuss the pros and cons of 3D culture compared to 2D when studying interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment.

KW - 2D culture

KW - 3D anchorage independent culture

KW - 3D culture

KW - Chemoresistance

KW - Tumor microenvironment

KW - Tumor migration

KW - Tumor proliferation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040940141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040940141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijms19010181

DO - 10.3390/ijms19010181

M3 - Review article

C2 - 29346265

AN - SCOPUS:85040940141

VL - 19

JO - International Journal of Molecular Sciences

JF - International Journal of Molecular Sciences

SN - 1661-6596

IS - 1

M1 - 181

ER -