Green Building Rating Systems and Whole-Building Life Cycle Assessment: Comparative Study of the Existing Assessment Tools

Sami Al-Gahmdi, Melissa M. Bilec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a growing interest in integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) into building design decision making due to LCA's comprehensive and systemic approach to environmental evaluation. Many green building rating systems (GBRSs) use LCA to various degrees. In this paper, a comparative study was performed to evaluate the LCA software tools available to building designers. A whole-building LCA was performed for a large building using three software LCA tools. The software tools vary in key aspects, such as intended users (e.g., LCA experts or novices), design stage in which they can be used, and time. The evaluated LCA tools varied significantly in the possibility of their use in early design and decision making. Some of the applications rely on a bill of materials that changes constantly in design alterations. However, others showed a greater advantage in that they can be integrated from the beginning of the design process. The comparative LCA results indicated that the impact of LCA software is dependent on the impact category and the precision in the process of material quantities takeoff. The case study was influenced by the building type and its intense operational energy requirements. Conventional energy efficiency measures, such as increasing the lighting efficiency, far exceeded what can be done to mitigate the embedded impact of construction materials. Thus, advancing the requirements of the LCA baseline building and addressing the operational phase in a more comprehensive framework are discussed. Finally, this paper examines the traditional building's systems that are usually involved in LCA and the possibility of adding other systems, such as plumbing, HVAC, and electrical systems, using building information modeling (BIM).

Original languageEnglish
Article number04016015
JournalJournal of Architectural Engineering
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Life cycle
Rating
Comparative Study
Assessment Tools
Life Cycle
Decision making
Plumbing
Takeoff
Energy efficiency
Lighting

Keywords

  • Building information modeling (BIM)
  • Environmental impact in buildings
  • Green building rating systems (GBRSs)
  • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)
  • Life cycle assessment (LCA)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Architecture
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

Green Building Rating Systems and Whole-Building Life Cycle Assessment : Comparative Study of the Existing Assessment Tools. / Al-Gahmdi, Sami; Bilec, Melissa M.

In: Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 1, 04016015, 01.03.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1acfd267e64844dfacdd701b210328bf,
title = "Green Building Rating Systems and Whole-Building Life Cycle Assessment: Comparative Study of the Existing Assessment Tools",
abstract = "There is a growing interest in integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) into building design decision making due to LCA's comprehensive and systemic approach to environmental evaluation. Many green building rating systems (GBRSs) use LCA to various degrees. In this paper, a comparative study was performed to evaluate the LCA software tools available to building designers. A whole-building LCA was performed for a large building using three software LCA tools. The software tools vary in key aspects, such as intended users (e.g., LCA experts or novices), design stage in which they can be used, and time. The evaluated LCA tools varied significantly in the possibility of their use in early design and decision making. Some of the applications rely on a bill of materials that changes constantly in design alterations. However, others showed a greater advantage in that they can be integrated from the beginning of the design process. The comparative LCA results indicated that the impact of LCA software is dependent on the impact category and the precision in the process of material quantities takeoff. The case study was influenced by the building type and its intense operational energy requirements. Conventional energy efficiency measures, such as increasing the lighting efficiency, far exceeded what can be done to mitigate the embedded impact of construction materials. Thus, advancing the requirements of the LCA baseline building and addressing the operational phase in a more comprehensive framework are discussed. Finally, this paper examines the traditional building's systems that are usually involved in LCA and the possibility of adding other systems, such as plumbing, HVAC, and electrical systems, using building information modeling (BIM).",
keywords = "Building information modeling (BIM), Environmental impact in buildings, Green building rating systems (GBRSs), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Life cycle assessment (LCA)",
author = "Sami Al-Gahmdi and Bilec, {Melissa M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000222",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "Journal of Architectural Engineering",
issn = "1076-0431",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Green Building Rating Systems and Whole-Building Life Cycle Assessment

T2 - Comparative Study of the Existing Assessment Tools

AU - Al-Gahmdi, Sami

AU - Bilec, Melissa M.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - There is a growing interest in integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) into building design decision making due to LCA's comprehensive and systemic approach to environmental evaluation. Many green building rating systems (GBRSs) use LCA to various degrees. In this paper, a comparative study was performed to evaluate the LCA software tools available to building designers. A whole-building LCA was performed for a large building using three software LCA tools. The software tools vary in key aspects, such as intended users (e.g., LCA experts or novices), design stage in which they can be used, and time. The evaluated LCA tools varied significantly in the possibility of their use in early design and decision making. Some of the applications rely on a bill of materials that changes constantly in design alterations. However, others showed a greater advantage in that they can be integrated from the beginning of the design process. The comparative LCA results indicated that the impact of LCA software is dependent on the impact category and the precision in the process of material quantities takeoff. The case study was influenced by the building type and its intense operational energy requirements. Conventional energy efficiency measures, such as increasing the lighting efficiency, far exceeded what can be done to mitigate the embedded impact of construction materials. Thus, advancing the requirements of the LCA baseline building and addressing the operational phase in a more comprehensive framework are discussed. Finally, this paper examines the traditional building's systems that are usually involved in LCA and the possibility of adding other systems, such as plumbing, HVAC, and electrical systems, using building information modeling (BIM).

AB - There is a growing interest in integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) into building design decision making due to LCA's comprehensive and systemic approach to environmental evaluation. Many green building rating systems (GBRSs) use LCA to various degrees. In this paper, a comparative study was performed to evaluate the LCA software tools available to building designers. A whole-building LCA was performed for a large building using three software LCA tools. The software tools vary in key aspects, such as intended users (e.g., LCA experts or novices), design stage in which they can be used, and time. The evaluated LCA tools varied significantly in the possibility of their use in early design and decision making. Some of the applications rely on a bill of materials that changes constantly in design alterations. However, others showed a greater advantage in that they can be integrated from the beginning of the design process. The comparative LCA results indicated that the impact of LCA software is dependent on the impact category and the precision in the process of material quantities takeoff. The case study was influenced by the building type and its intense operational energy requirements. Conventional energy efficiency measures, such as increasing the lighting efficiency, far exceeded what can be done to mitigate the embedded impact of construction materials. Thus, advancing the requirements of the LCA baseline building and addressing the operational phase in a more comprehensive framework are discussed. Finally, this paper examines the traditional building's systems that are usually involved in LCA and the possibility of adding other systems, such as plumbing, HVAC, and electrical systems, using building information modeling (BIM).

KW - Building information modeling (BIM)

KW - Environmental impact in buildings

KW - Green building rating systems (GBRSs)

KW - Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)

KW - Life cycle assessment (LCA)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013191470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013191470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000222

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000222

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85013191470

VL - 23

JO - Journal of Architectural Engineering

JF - Journal of Architectural Engineering

SN - 1076-0431

IS - 1

M1 - 04016015

ER -