Forward osmosis process for supply of fertilizer solutions from seawater using a mixture of draw solutions

Ali Altaee, Graeme J. Millar, Adel O. Sharif, Guillermo Zaragoza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Novel desalination approaches are required to provide both drinking and agricultural water as there is ever increasing stress upon precious freshwater resources. It was our hypothesis that a modified Forward Osmosis (FO) process had the potential for production of irrigation water comprising of appropriate concentrations of fertilizers from a seawater feed. Four agents, KNO3, Na2SO4, CaNO3, and MgCl2, plus 35 g/L seawater were used as the draw and feed solutions of the FO process. Net Driving Pressure in the FO process was manipulated either by increasing the concentration of draw solution (FO process) or by increasing feed pressure (Pressure Assisted FO (PAFO) process). A series of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were used for the regeneration of draw solution. The results suggested that a PAFO process was more energy efficient than simple FO, provided the energy relating to the brine flow from the NF/RO membrane for pressurizing the feed solution of PAFO process was used. Furthermore, this study suggested using a mixture of a primary draw solution, MgCl2, and a secondary draw solution, KNO3, for NO3 supply into the irrigation water was preferable. As such, MgCl2 provided the driving force for fresh water extraction while KNO3 was the source of fertilizer in the irrigation water. Results showed that water quality provided by application of a MgCl2 + KNO3 draw solution was better than that from KNO3 or Ca(NO3)2. The concentrations of NO3 and SO4 in irrigation water were within recommended levels when the diluted draw solution was regenerated by a dual stage low-pressure RO process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalDesalination and Water Treatment
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 30 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Osmosis
Fertilizers
osmosis
Seawater
fertilizer
seawater
Irrigation
Reverse osmosis
irrigation
Water
Osmosis membranes
Nanofiltration
water
membrane
Pressurization
Desalination
drinking
desalination
brine
Water quality

Keywords

  • Draw solution
  • Fertigation
  • Forward osmosis
  • Irrigation water
  • Regeneration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pollution
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Ocean Engineering

Cite this

Forward osmosis process for supply of fertilizer solutions from seawater using a mixture of draw solutions. / Altaee, Ali; Millar, Graeme J.; Sharif, Adel O.; Zaragoza, Guillermo.

In: Desalination and Water Treatment, 30.04.2016, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1aa5a1332e1c41e280f1bead6e5399c5,
title = "Forward osmosis process for supply of fertilizer solutions from seawater using a mixture of draw solutions",
abstract = "Novel desalination approaches are required to provide both drinking and agricultural water as there is ever increasing stress upon precious freshwater resources. It was our hypothesis that a modified Forward Osmosis (FO) process had the potential for production of irrigation water comprising of appropriate concentrations of fertilizers from a seawater feed. Four agents, KNO3, Na2SO4, CaNO3, and MgCl2, plus 35 g/L seawater were used as the draw and feed solutions of the FO process. Net Driving Pressure in the FO process was manipulated either by increasing the concentration of draw solution (FO process) or by increasing feed pressure (Pressure Assisted FO (PAFO) process). A series of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were used for the regeneration of draw solution. The results suggested that a PAFO process was more energy efficient than simple FO, provided the energy relating to the brine flow from the NF/RO membrane for pressurizing the feed solution of PAFO process was used. Furthermore, this study suggested using a mixture of a primary draw solution, MgCl2, and a secondary draw solution, KNO3, for NO3 supply into the irrigation water was preferable. As such, MgCl2 provided the driving force for fresh water extraction while KNO3 was the source of fertilizer in the irrigation water. Results showed that water quality provided by application of a MgCl2 + KNO3 draw solution was better than that from KNO3 or Ca(NO3)2. The concentrations of NO3 and SO4 in irrigation water were within recommended levels when the diluted draw solution was regenerated by a dual stage low-pressure RO process.",
keywords = "Draw solution, Fertigation, Forward osmosis, Irrigation water, Regeneration",
author = "Ali Altaee and Millar, {Graeme J.} and Sharif, {Adel O.} and Guillermo Zaragoza",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/19443994.2016.1180642",
language = "English",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Desalination and Water Treatment",
issn = "1944-3994",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forward osmosis process for supply of fertilizer solutions from seawater using a mixture of draw solutions

AU - Altaee, Ali

AU - Millar, Graeme J.

AU - Sharif, Adel O.

AU - Zaragoza, Guillermo

PY - 2016/4/30

Y1 - 2016/4/30

N2 - Novel desalination approaches are required to provide both drinking and agricultural water as there is ever increasing stress upon precious freshwater resources. It was our hypothesis that a modified Forward Osmosis (FO) process had the potential for production of irrigation water comprising of appropriate concentrations of fertilizers from a seawater feed. Four agents, KNO3, Na2SO4, CaNO3, and MgCl2, plus 35 g/L seawater were used as the draw and feed solutions of the FO process. Net Driving Pressure in the FO process was manipulated either by increasing the concentration of draw solution (FO process) or by increasing feed pressure (Pressure Assisted FO (PAFO) process). A series of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were used for the regeneration of draw solution. The results suggested that a PAFO process was more energy efficient than simple FO, provided the energy relating to the brine flow from the NF/RO membrane for pressurizing the feed solution of PAFO process was used. Furthermore, this study suggested using a mixture of a primary draw solution, MgCl2, and a secondary draw solution, KNO3, for NO3 supply into the irrigation water was preferable. As such, MgCl2 provided the driving force for fresh water extraction while KNO3 was the source of fertilizer in the irrigation water. Results showed that water quality provided by application of a MgCl2 + KNO3 draw solution was better than that from KNO3 or Ca(NO3)2. The concentrations of NO3 and SO4 in irrigation water were within recommended levels when the diluted draw solution was regenerated by a dual stage low-pressure RO process.

AB - Novel desalination approaches are required to provide both drinking and agricultural water as there is ever increasing stress upon precious freshwater resources. It was our hypothesis that a modified Forward Osmosis (FO) process had the potential for production of irrigation water comprising of appropriate concentrations of fertilizers from a seawater feed. Four agents, KNO3, Na2SO4, CaNO3, and MgCl2, plus 35 g/L seawater were used as the draw and feed solutions of the FO process. Net Driving Pressure in the FO process was manipulated either by increasing the concentration of draw solution (FO process) or by increasing feed pressure (Pressure Assisted FO (PAFO) process). A series of nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were used for the regeneration of draw solution. The results suggested that a PAFO process was more energy efficient than simple FO, provided the energy relating to the brine flow from the NF/RO membrane for pressurizing the feed solution of PAFO process was used. Furthermore, this study suggested using a mixture of a primary draw solution, MgCl2, and a secondary draw solution, KNO3, for NO3 supply into the irrigation water was preferable. As such, MgCl2 provided the driving force for fresh water extraction while KNO3 was the source of fertilizer in the irrigation water. Results showed that water quality provided by application of a MgCl2 + KNO3 draw solution was better than that from KNO3 or Ca(NO3)2. The concentrations of NO3 and SO4 in irrigation water were within recommended levels when the diluted draw solution was regenerated by a dual stage low-pressure RO process.

KW - Draw solution

KW - Fertigation

KW - Forward osmosis

KW - Irrigation water

KW - Regeneration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965047090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965047090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19443994.2016.1180642

DO - 10.1080/19443994.2016.1180642

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Desalination and Water Treatment

JF - Desalination and Water Treatment

SN - 1944-3994

ER -