Focused tortuosity definitions based on expert clinical assessment of corneal subbasal nerves

Neil Lagali, Enea Poletti, Dipika V. Patel, Charles N J McGhee, Pedram Hamrah, Ahmad Kheirkhah, Mitra Tavakoli, Ioannis N. Petropoulos, Rayaz Malik, Tor Paaske Utheim, Andrey Zhivov, Oliver Stachs, Karen Falke, Sabine Peschel, Rudolf Guthoff, Cecilia Chao, Blanka Golebiowski, Fiona Stapleton, Alfredo Ruggeri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE. We examined agreement among experts in the assessment of corneal subbasal nerve tortuosity. METHODS. Images of corneal subbasal nerves were obtained from investigators at seven sites (Auckland, Boston, Linköping, Manchester, Oslo, Rostock, and Sydney) using laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy. A set of 30 images was assembled and ordered by increasing tortuosity by 10 expert graders from the seven sites. In a first experiment, graders assessed tortuosity without a specific definition and performed grading three times, with at least 1 week between sessions. In a second experiment, graders assessed the same image set using four focused tortuosity definitions. Intersession and intergrader repeatability for the experiments were determined using the Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS. Expert graders without a specific tortuosity definition had high intersession (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.80), but poor intergrader (0.62) repeatability. Specific definitions improved intergrader repeatability to 0.79. In particular, tortuosity defined by frequent small-amplitude directional changes (short range tortuosity) or by infrequent large- amplitude directional changes (long range tortuosity), indicated largely independent measures and resulted in improved repeatability across the graders. A further refinement, grading only the most tortuous nerve in a given image, improved the average correlation of a given grader’s ordering of images with the group average to 0.86 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS. Definitions of tortuosity specifying short or long-range tortuosity and considering only the most tortuous nerve in an image improved the agreement in tortuosity grading among a group of expert observers. These definitions could improve accuracy and consistency in quantifying subbasal nerve tortuosity in clinical studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5102-5109
Number of pages8
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume56
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Confocal Microscopy
Lasers
Research Personnel
Intravital Microscopy
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Corneal nerves
  • In vivo confocal microscopy
  • Plexus
  • Subbasal nerve
  • Tortuosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Lagali, N., Poletti, E., Patel, D. V., McGhee, C. N. J., Hamrah, P., Kheirkhah, A., ... Ruggeri, A. (2015). Focused tortuosity definitions based on expert clinical assessment of corneal subbasal nerves. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 56(9), 5102-5109. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17284

Focused tortuosity definitions based on expert clinical assessment of corneal subbasal nerves. / Lagali, Neil; Poletti, Enea; Patel, Dipika V.; McGhee, Charles N J; Hamrah, Pedram; Kheirkhah, Ahmad; Tavakoli, Mitra; Petropoulos, Ioannis N.; Malik, Rayaz; Utheim, Tor Paaske; Zhivov, Andrey; Stachs, Oliver; Falke, Karen; Peschel, Sabine; Guthoff, Rudolf; Chao, Cecilia; Golebiowski, Blanka; Stapleton, Fiona; Ruggeri, Alfredo.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 56, No. 9, 2015, p. 5102-5109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lagali, N, Poletti, E, Patel, DV, McGhee, CNJ, Hamrah, P, Kheirkhah, A, Tavakoli, M, Petropoulos, IN, Malik, R, Utheim, TP, Zhivov, A, Stachs, O, Falke, K, Peschel, S, Guthoff, R, Chao, C, Golebiowski, B, Stapleton, F & Ruggeri, A 2015, 'Focused tortuosity definitions based on expert clinical assessment of corneal subbasal nerves', Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 5102-5109. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17284
Lagali, Neil ; Poletti, Enea ; Patel, Dipika V. ; McGhee, Charles N J ; Hamrah, Pedram ; Kheirkhah, Ahmad ; Tavakoli, Mitra ; Petropoulos, Ioannis N. ; Malik, Rayaz ; Utheim, Tor Paaske ; Zhivov, Andrey ; Stachs, Oliver ; Falke, Karen ; Peschel, Sabine ; Guthoff, Rudolf ; Chao, Cecilia ; Golebiowski, Blanka ; Stapleton, Fiona ; Ruggeri, Alfredo. / Focused tortuosity definitions based on expert clinical assessment of corneal subbasal nerves. In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2015 ; Vol. 56, No. 9. pp. 5102-5109.
@article{a86b7ca0e1314b88a3c37fe919e8fce3,
title = "Focused tortuosity definitions based on expert clinical assessment of corneal subbasal nerves",
abstract = "PURPOSE. We examined agreement among experts in the assessment of corneal subbasal nerve tortuosity. METHODS. Images of corneal subbasal nerves were obtained from investigators at seven sites (Auckland, Boston, Link{\"o}ping, Manchester, Oslo, Rostock, and Sydney) using laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy. A set of 30 images was assembled and ordered by increasing tortuosity by 10 expert graders from the seven sites. In a first experiment, graders assessed tortuosity without a specific definition and performed grading three times, with at least 1 week between sessions. In a second experiment, graders assessed the same image set using four focused tortuosity definitions. Intersession and intergrader repeatability for the experiments were determined using the Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS. Expert graders without a specific tortuosity definition had high intersession (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.80), but poor intergrader (0.62) repeatability. Specific definitions improved intergrader repeatability to 0.79. In particular, tortuosity defined by frequent small-amplitude directional changes (short range tortuosity) or by infrequent large- amplitude directional changes (long range tortuosity), indicated largely independent measures and resulted in improved repeatability across the graders. A further refinement, grading only the most tortuous nerve in a given image, improved the average correlation of a given grader’s ordering of images with the group average to 0.86 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS. Definitions of tortuosity specifying short or long-range tortuosity and considering only the most tortuous nerve in an image improved the agreement in tortuosity grading among a group of expert observers. These definitions could improve accuracy and consistency in quantifying subbasal nerve tortuosity in clinical studies.",
keywords = "Corneal nerves, In vivo confocal microscopy, Plexus, Subbasal nerve, Tortuosity",
author = "Neil Lagali and Enea Poletti and Patel, {Dipika V.} and McGhee, {Charles N J} and Pedram Hamrah and Ahmad Kheirkhah and Mitra Tavakoli and Petropoulos, {Ioannis N.} and Rayaz Malik and Utheim, {Tor Paaske} and Andrey Zhivov and Oliver Stachs and Karen Falke and Sabine Peschel and Rudolf Guthoff and Cecilia Chao and Blanka Golebiowski and Fiona Stapleton and Alfredo Ruggeri",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1167/iovs.15-17284",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "5102--5109",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Focused tortuosity definitions based on expert clinical assessment of corneal subbasal nerves

AU - Lagali, Neil

AU - Poletti, Enea

AU - Patel, Dipika V.

AU - McGhee, Charles N J

AU - Hamrah, Pedram

AU - Kheirkhah, Ahmad

AU - Tavakoli, Mitra

AU - Petropoulos, Ioannis N.

AU - Malik, Rayaz

AU - Utheim, Tor Paaske

AU - Zhivov, Andrey

AU - Stachs, Oliver

AU - Falke, Karen

AU - Peschel, Sabine

AU - Guthoff, Rudolf

AU - Chao, Cecilia

AU - Golebiowski, Blanka

AU - Stapleton, Fiona

AU - Ruggeri, Alfredo

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - PURPOSE. We examined agreement among experts in the assessment of corneal subbasal nerve tortuosity. METHODS. Images of corneal subbasal nerves were obtained from investigators at seven sites (Auckland, Boston, Linköping, Manchester, Oslo, Rostock, and Sydney) using laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy. A set of 30 images was assembled and ordered by increasing tortuosity by 10 expert graders from the seven sites. In a first experiment, graders assessed tortuosity without a specific definition and performed grading three times, with at least 1 week between sessions. In a second experiment, graders assessed the same image set using four focused tortuosity definitions. Intersession and intergrader repeatability for the experiments were determined using the Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS. Expert graders without a specific tortuosity definition had high intersession (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.80), but poor intergrader (0.62) repeatability. Specific definitions improved intergrader repeatability to 0.79. In particular, tortuosity defined by frequent small-amplitude directional changes (short range tortuosity) or by infrequent large- amplitude directional changes (long range tortuosity), indicated largely independent measures and resulted in improved repeatability across the graders. A further refinement, grading only the most tortuous nerve in a given image, improved the average correlation of a given grader’s ordering of images with the group average to 0.86 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS. Definitions of tortuosity specifying short or long-range tortuosity and considering only the most tortuous nerve in an image improved the agreement in tortuosity grading among a group of expert observers. These definitions could improve accuracy and consistency in quantifying subbasal nerve tortuosity in clinical studies.

AB - PURPOSE. We examined agreement among experts in the assessment of corneal subbasal nerve tortuosity. METHODS. Images of corneal subbasal nerves were obtained from investigators at seven sites (Auckland, Boston, Linköping, Manchester, Oslo, Rostock, and Sydney) using laser-scanning in vivo confocal microscopy. A set of 30 images was assembled and ordered by increasing tortuosity by 10 expert graders from the seven sites. In a first experiment, graders assessed tortuosity without a specific definition and performed grading three times, with at least 1 week between sessions. In a second experiment, graders assessed the same image set using four focused tortuosity definitions. Intersession and intergrader repeatability for the experiments were determined using the Spearman rank correlation. RESULTS. Expert graders without a specific tortuosity definition had high intersession (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.80), but poor intergrader (0.62) repeatability. Specific definitions improved intergrader repeatability to 0.79. In particular, tortuosity defined by frequent small-amplitude directional changes (short range tortuosity) or by infrequent large- amplitude directional changes (long range tortuosity), indicated largely independent measures and resulted in improved repeatability across the graders. A further refinement, grading only the most tortuous nerve in a given image, improved the average correlation of a given grader’s ordering of images with the group average to 0.86 to 0.90. CONCLUSIONS. Definitions of tortuosity specifying short or long-range tortuosity and considering only the most tortuous nerve in an image improved the agreement in tortuosity grading among a group of expert observers. These definitions could improve accuracy and consistency in quantifying subbasal nerve tortuosity in clinical studies.

KW - Corneal nerves

KW - In vivo confocal microscopy

KW - Plexus

KW - Subbasal nerve

KW - Tortuosity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939832467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939832467&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/iovs.15-17284

DO - 10.1167/iovs.15-17284

M3 - Article

C2 - 26241397

AN - SCOPUS:84939832467

VL - 56

SP - 5102

EP - 5109

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 9

ER -