Fitness versus adiposity in cardiovascular disease risk

Lance E. Davidson, Steven Hunt, Ted D. Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Obesity and low cardiorespiratory fitness are both established predictors of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Whether the protective effects of fitness outweigh the deleterious effects of obesity, however, remains a topic of debate. To extend knowledge of the relative influence of fitness and fatness on cardiovascular disease outcomes, however, attention must be paid to measurement quality. Eliminating inherent bias of self-report and including the highest quality assessments of cardiorespiratory fitness and fatness simultaneously are imperative for head-to-head comparisons. Studies must move beyond body mass index and total body fat percentage to differentiate the heterogenous effects of various adipose tissue depots on cardiovascular risk. Imaging techniques that measure visceral adiposity and other risk-laden ectopic adipose depots while also quantifying cardioprotective adipose depots such as lower body subcutaneous fat and even non-adipose tissues such as skeletal muscle may further illuminate the influence of body composition on cardiovascular health. This review underscores key studies within a large body of literature that provide the foundation for the fit-vs.-fat debate in the context of cardiovascular disease risk, and identifies important considerations for future research.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Adiposity
Cardiovascular Diseases
Adipose Tissue
Obesity
Subcutaneous Fat
Subcutaneous Tissue
Body Composition
Self Report
Skeletal Muscle
Body Mass Index
Fats
Morbidity
Mortality
Health
Cardiorespiratory Fitness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Fitness versus adiposity in cardiovascular disease risk. / Davidson, Lance E.; Hunt, Steven; Adams, Ted D.

In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d8ba31fb0cf406db19a2e94a9cb5eac,
title = "Fitness versus adiposity in cardiovascular disease risk",
abstract = "Obesity and low cardiorespiratory fitness are both established predictors of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Whether the protective effects of fitness outweigh the deleterious effects of obesity, however, remains a topic of debate. To extend knowledge of the relative influence of fitness and fatness on cardiovascular disease outcomes, however, attention must be paid to measurement quality. Eliminating inherent bias of self-report and including the highest quality assessments of cardiorespiratory fitness and fatness simultaneously are imperative for head-to-head comparisons. Studies must move beyond body mass index and total body fat percentage to differentiate the heterogenous effects of various adipose tissue depots on cardiovascular risk. Imaging techniques that measure visceral adiposity and other risk-laden ectopic adipose depots while also quantifying cardioprotective adipose depots such as lower body subcutaneous fat and even non-adipose tissues such as skeletal muscle may further illuminate the influence of body composition on cardiovascular health. This review underscores key studies within a large body of literature that provide the foundation for the fit-vs.-fat debate in the context of cardiovascular disease risk, and identifies important considerations for future research.",
author = "Davidson, {Lance E.} and Steven Hunt and Adams, {Ted D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41430-018-0333-5",
language = "English",
journal = "European Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0954-3007",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fitness versus adiposity in cardiovascular disease risk

AU - Davidson, Lance E.

AU - Hunt, Steven

AU - Adams, Ted D.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Obesity and low cardiorespiratory fitness are both established predictors of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Whether the protective effects of fitness outweigh the deleterious effects of obesity, however, remains a topic of debate. To extend knowledge of the relative influence of fitness and fatness on cardiovascular disease outcomes, however, attention must be paid to measurement quality. Eliminating inherent bias of self-report and including the highest quality assessments of cardiorespiratory fitness and fatness simultaneously are imperative for head-to-head comparisons. Studies must move beyond body mass index and total body fat percentage to differentiate the heterogenous effects of various adipose tissue depots on cardiovascular risk. Imaging techniques that measure visceral adiposity and other risk-laden ectopic adipose depots while also quantifying cardioprotective adipose depots such as lower body subcutaneous fat and even non-adipose tissues such as skeletal muscle may further illuminate the influence of body composition on cardiovascular health. This review underscores key studies within a large body of literature that provide the foundation for the fit-vs.-fat debate in the context of cardiovascular disease risk, and identifies important considerations for future research.

AB - Obesity and low cardiorespiratory fitness are both established predictors of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Whether the protective effects of fitness outweigh the deleterious effects of obesity, however, remains a topic of debate. To extend knowledge of the relative influence of fitness and fatness on cardiovascular disease outcomes, however, attention must be paid to measurement quality. Eliminating inherent bias of self-report and including the highest quality assessments of cardiorespiratory fitness and fatness simultaneously are imperative for head-to-head comparisons. Studies must move beyond body mass index and total body fat percentage to differentiate the heterogenous effects of various adipose tissue depots on cardiovascular risk. Imaging techniques that measure visceral adiposity and other risk-laden ectopic adipose depots while also quantifying cardioprotective adipose depots such as lower body subcutaneous fat and even non-adipose tissues such as skeletal muscle may further illuminate the influence of body composition on cardiovascular health. This review underscores key studies within a large body of literature that provide the foundation for the fit-vs.-fat debate in the context of cardiovascular disease risk, and identifies important considerations for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054577682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054577682&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41430-018-0333-5

DO - 10.1038/s41430-018-0333-5

M3 - Article

JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0954-3007

ER -