Feed water arrangements in a multi-effect desalting system

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A multi-effect boiling (MEB) desalting system with unit capacity up to 5 MIGD becomes a strong competitor to the multi-stage flash (MSF) desalting system due to its low specific energy consumption and the low temperature steam required to operate the system. A considerable number of units have been installed in the Arabian Gulf area recently. There are many flow sheet variants for the MEB desalting system. Each variant suits certain design objectives. The schemes of the feed water flow to the effects and implementation of feed water heaters and flash boxes are among the significant differences between these flow sheets that have major influences on the system performance and the adopted analysis to evaluate the system. This paper outlines the commonly used feed water arrangements in multi-effect desalting systems, e.g. forward, backward, parallel, and mixed feed. For each flow sheet arrangement, the thermodynamic analysis used is presented. These analyses determine the temperature and salinity profiles of the system, the amount of vapor generated by boiling and by flashing in each effect, the required heat transfer areas for the effects and feed heaters, the gain and recovery ratios, and cooling water to distillate ratio. The analytical results obtained in this work are compared with several practical multi-effect desalting systems of typical capacity and number of effects. This comparison illustrates the logic behind choosing each flow sheet arrangement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-54
Number of pages25
JournalDesalination
Volume228
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Salt removal
sheet flow
Water
Boiling liquids
water
Water heaters
Steam
Cooling water
Energy utilization
Vapors
effect
Thermodynamics
cooling water
Heat transfer
Recovery
Temperature
heat transfer
water flow
thermodynamics
salinity

Keywords

  • Feed arrangements
  • Gain ratio
  • MEB
  • Regenerative feed heating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Filtration and Separation

Cite this

Feed water arrangements in a multi-effect desalting system. / Darwish, M. A.; Abdulrahim, Hassan K.

In: Desalination, Vol. 228, No. 1-3, 15.08.2008, p. 30-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dce29ac0240c453fac360d8593673c8c,
title = "Feed water arrangements in a multi-effect desalting system",
abstract = "A multi-effect boiling (MEB) desalting system with unit capacity up to 5 MIGD becomes a strong competitor to the multi-stage flash (MSF) desalting system due to its low specific energy consumption and the low temperature steam required to operate the system. A considerable number of units have been installed in the Arabian Gulf area recently. There are many flow sheet variants for the MEB desalting system. Each variant suits certain design objectives. The schemes of the feed water flow to the effects and implementation of feed water heaters and flash boxes are among the significant differences between these flow sheets that have major influences on the system performance and the adopted analysis to evaluate the system. This paper outlines the commonly used feed water arrangements in multi-effect desalting systems, e.g. forward, backward, parallel, and mixed feed. For each flow sheet arrangement, the thermodynamic analysis used is presented. These analyses determine the temperature and salinity profiles of the system, the amount of vapor generated by boiling and by flashing in each effect, the required heat transfer areas for the effects and feed heaters, the gain and recovery ratios, and cooling water to distillate ratio. The analytical results obtained in this work are compared with several practical multi-effect desalting systems of typical capacity and number of effects. This comparison illustrates the logic behind choosing each flow sheet arrangement.",
keywords = "Feed arrangements, Gain ratio, MEB, Regenerative feed heating",
author = "Darwish, {M. A.} and Abdulrahim, {Hassan K.}",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.039",
language = "English",
volume = "228",
pages = "30--54",
journal = "Desalination",
issn = "0011-9164",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feed water arrangements in a multi-effect desalting system

AU - Darwish, M. A.

AU - Abdulrahim, Hassan K.

PY - 2008/8/15

Y1 - 2008/8/15

N2 - A multi-effect boiling (MEB) desalting system with unit capacity up to 5 MIGD becomes a strong competitor to the multi-stage flash (MSF) desalting system due to its low specific energy consumption and the low temperature steam required to operate the system. A considerable number of units have been installed in the Arabian Gulf area recently. There are many flow sheet variants for the MEB desalting system. Each variant suits certain design objectives. The schemes of the feed water flow to the effects and implementation of feed water heaters and flash boxes are among the significant differences between these flow sheets that have major influences on the system performance and the adopted analysis to evaluate the system. This paper outlines the commonly used feed water arrangements in multi-effect desalting systems, e.g. forward, backward, parallel, and mixed feed. For each flow sheet arrangement, the thermodynamic analysis used is presented. These analyses determine the temperature and salinity profiles of the system, the amount of vapor generated by boiling and by flashing in each effect, the required heat transfer areas for the effects and feed heaters, the gain and recovery ratios, and cooling water to distillate ratio. The analytical results obtained in this work are compared with several practical multi-effect desalting systems of typical capacity and number of effects. This comparison illustrates the logic behind choosing each flow sheet arrangement.

AB - A multi-effect boiling (MEB) desalting system with unit capacity up to 5 MIGD becomes a strong competitor to the multi-stage flash (MSF) desalting system due to its low specific energy consumption and the low temperature steam required to operate the system. A considerable number of units have been installed in the Arabian Gulf area recently. There are many flow sheet variants for the MEB desalting system. Each variant suits certain design objectives. The schemes of the feed water flow to the effects and implementation of feed water heaters and flash boxes are among the significant differences between these flow sheets that have major influences on the system performance and the adopted analysis to evaluate the system. This paper outlines the commonly used feed water arrangements in multi-effect desalting systems, e.g. forward, backward, parallel, and mixed feed. For each flow sheet arrangement, the thermodynamic analysis used is presented. These analyses determine the temperature and salinity profiles of the system, the amount of vapor generated by boiling and by flashing in each effect, the required heat transfer areas for the effects and feed heaters, the gain and recovery ratios, and cooling water to distillate ratio. The analytical results obtained in this work are compared with several practical multi-effect desalting systems of typical capacity and number of effects. This comparison illustrates the logic behind choosing each flow sheet arrangement.

KW - Feed arrangements

KW - Gain ratio

KW - MEB

KW - Regenerative feed heating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47049093972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47049093972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.039

DO - 10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.039

M3 - Article

VL - 228

SP - 30

EP - 54

JO - Desalination

JF - Desalination

SN - 0011-9164

IS - 1-3

ER -