Environmental assessment of intake alternatives for seawater reverse osmosis in the Arabian Gulf

Abdulrahman H. Al-Kaabi, Hamish Mackey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The study carried out an environmental assessment for two seawater reverse osmosis (RO)plants located within the Arabian Gulf considering subsurface intake alternatives and differing energy source options. The study used life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental impacts for open intake pretreatment vs. subsurface intake pretreatments of two plants with operating capacities of approximately 175,000 m 3 /d and 275,000 m 3 /d respectively. For both RO plants, electricity and chemical inputs were considered. Significant energy reductions of 30% were observed with subsurface intakes for extraction and pretreatment, resulting in a plant-wide energy saving of 6%. Open intake pretreatment had higher environmental impacts compared to subsurface intake across all impact categories, although in some impact categories significant differences existed between the two similar plants due to differences in chemicals used. The study further established that the renewable PV power generation resulted in the lowest global warming potential (GWP); however, a significant trade-off occurs with this energy source since it had the highest impact relative to both ozone and abiotic depletion potentials and was also worse than natural gas for both marine and human toxicity potentials. The GWP reductions achievable using a subsurface intake for the larger of the two plants is equivalent to 58,000 tons of CO 2 per year, or more than 12,000 cars, making subsurface intakes a worthy alternative to conventional open intake systems in the Arabian Gulf region. Marine aquatic eco-toxicity potential was identified as the most significant normalized environmental impact, which should be best managed through using natural gas as an energy source.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-30
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume242
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Reverse osmosis
environmental assessment
Seawater
Environmental impact
Global warming
seawater
Toxicity
Natural gas
Intake systems
environmental impact
Ozone
Power generation
Life cycle
global warming
natural gas
Energy conservation
Railroad cars
Electricity
power generation
trade-off

Keywords

  • Desalination
  • Energy source
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential
  • RO pretreatment
  • Subsurface intake

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Environmental assessment of intake alternatives for seawater reverse osmosis in the Arabian Gulf. / Al-Kaabi, Abdulrahman H.; Mackey, Hamish.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 242, 15.07.2019, p. 22-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7873b632b31541a7b58136ffec3df9c6,
title = "Environmental assessment of intake alternatives for seawater reverse osmosis in the Arabian Gulf",
abstract = "The study carried out an environmental assessment for two seawater reverse osmosis (RO)plants located within the Arabian Gulf considering subsurface intake alternatives and differing energy source options. The study used life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental impacts for open intake pretreatment vs. subsurface intake pretreatments of two plants with operating capacities of approximately 175,000 m 3 /d and 275,000 m 3 /d respectively. For both RO plants, electricity and chemical inputs were considered. Significant energy reductions of 30{\%} were observed with subsurface intakes for extraction and pretreatment, resulting in a plant-wide energy saving of 6{\%}. Open intake pretreatment had higher environmental impacts compared to subsurface intake across all impact categories, although in some impact categories significant differences existed between the two similar plants due to differences in chemicals used. The study further established that the renewable PV power generation resulted in the lowest global warming potential (GWP); however, a significant trade-off occurs with this energy source since it had the highest impact relative to both ozone and abiotic depletion potentials and was also worse than natural gas for both marine and human toxicity potentials. The GWP reductions achievable using a subsurface intake for the larger of the two plants is equivalent to 58,000 tons of CO 2 per year, or more than 12,000 cars, making subsurface intakes a worthy alternative to conventional open intake systems in the Arabian Gulf region. Marine aquatic eco-toxicity potential was identified as the most significant normalized environmental impact, which should be best managed through using natural gas as an energy source.",
keywords = "Desalination, Energy source, Life cycle assessment, Marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential, RO pretreatment, Subsurface intake",
author = "Al-Kaabi, {Abdulrahman H.} and Hamish Mackey",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.051",
language = "English",
volume = "242",
pages = "22--30",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental assessment of intake alternatives for seawater reverse osmosis in the Arabian Gulf

AU - Al-Kaabi, Abdulrahman H.

AU - Mackey, Hamish

PY - 2019/7/15

Y1 - 2019/7/15

N2 - The study carried out an environmental assessment for two seawater reverse osmosis (RO)plants located within the Arabian Gulf considering subsurface intake alternatives and differing energy source options. The study used life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental impacts for open intake pretreatment vs. subsurface intake pretreatments of two plants with operating capacities of approximately 175,000 m 3 /d and 275,000 m 3 /d respectively. For both RO plants, electricity and chemical inputs were considered. Significant energy reductions of 30% were observed with subsurface intakes for extraction and pretreatment, resulting in a plant-wide energy saving of 6%. Open intake pretreatment had higher environmental impacts compared to subsurface intake across all impact categories, although in some impact categories significant differences existed between the two similar plants due to differences in chemicals used. The study further established that the renewable PV power generation resulted in the lowest global warming potential (GWP); however, a significant trade-off occurs with this energy source since it had the highest impact relative to both ozone and abiotic depletion potentials and was also worse than natural gas for both marine and human toxicity potentials. The GWP reductions achievable using a subsurface intake for the larger of the two plants is equivalent to 58,000 tons of CO 2 per year, or more than 12,000 cars, making subsurface intakes a worthy alternative to conventional open intake systems in the Arabian Gulf region. Marine aquatic eco-toxicity potential was identified as the most significant normalized environmental impact, which should be best managed through using natural gas as an energy source.

AB - The study carried out an environmental assessment for two seawater reverse osmosis (RO)plants located within the Arabian Gulf considering subsurface intake alternatives and differing energy source options. The study used life cycle assessment to quantify the environmental impacts for open intake pretreatment vs. subsurface intake pretreatments of two plants with operating capacities of approximately 175,000 m 3 /d and 275,000 m 3 /d respectively. For both RO plants, electricity and chemical inputs were considered. Significant energy reductions of 30% were observed with subsurface intakes for extraction and pretreatment, resulting in a plant-wide energy saving of 6%. Open intake pretreatment had higher environmental impacts compared to subsurface intake across all impact categories, although in some impact categories significant differences existed between the two similar plants due to differences in chemicals used. The study further established that the renewable PV power generation resulted in the lowest global warming potential (GWP); however, a significant trade-off occurs with this energy source since it had the highest impact relative to both ozone and abiotic depletion potentials and was also worse than natural gas for both marine and human toxicity potentials. The GWP reductions achievable using a subsurface intake for the larger of the two plants is equivalent to 58,000 tons of CO 2 per year, or more than 12,000 cars, making subsurface intakes a worthy alternative to conventional open intake systems in the Arabian Gulf region. Marine aquatic eco-toxicity potential was identified as the most significant normalized environmental impact, which should be best managed through using natural gas as an energy source.

KW - Desalination

KW - Energy source

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Marine aquatic ecotoxicity potential

KW - RO pretreatment

KW - Subsurface intake

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064735268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064735268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.051

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.051

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064735268

VL - 242

SP - 22

EP - 30

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -