Enhancement of the completion efficiency of perforation tunnels in petroleum wells

Azizur Rahaman, T. Heidrick, B. Fleck, M. Koksal

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The objective of perforating is to maximize well productivity by establishing good connectivity between the wellbore and formation. The conventional method of perforation - perforation by shooting (PS) cannot achieve expected wellbore productivity due to a region of reduced permeability around the perforation tunnel. In this study, it has been established that permeability is decreased in the range of 30%-75% due to the implementation of the PS technique compared to the openhole completion. As a result, a new perforation technique - perforation by drilling (PD) has been proposed in this paper. To simulate a perforated completion, cylindrical sand samples (0.0572 m OD) consolidated with cement with varying porosity were prepared. These samples were perforated (0.0136 m ID) by the PS, PD and Casting techniques. Perforations created by the Casting techniques are considered the ideal, openhole perforation tunnel. Fluid flow rates and differential pressure across the perforated samples were measured for three different types of samples using "Geotechnical Digital System" triaxial testing set-up. Fluid flow rates with changing differential pressure and finally pressure build-up data with time indicates the PD technique can achieve better wellbore productivity compared to the PS technique. Results indicate that at 100 kPa differential pressure the PS, PD and Casting techniques can achieve 0.20 mL/s, 0.65 mL/s and 1.00 mL/s fluid flow rates respectively across a sample.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2006 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006
Volume2006
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes
Event2006 2nd ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006 - Miami, FL, United States
Duration: 17 Jul 200620 Jul 2006

Other

Other2006 2nd ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006
CountryUnited States
CityMiami, FL
Period17/7/0620/7/06

Fingerprint

Well perforation
Well completion
Drilling
Tunnels
Crude oil
Flow of fluids
Casting
Productivity
Flow rate
Perforating
Cements
Sand
Porosity
Testing

Keywords

  • Formation damage
  • Perforations
  • Productivity index
  • Skin factor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Rahaman, A., Heidrick, T., Fleck, B., & Koksal, M. (2006). Enhancement of the completion efficiency of perforation tunnels in petroleum wells. In 2006 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006 (Vol. 2006)

Enhancement of the completion efficiency of perforation tunnels in petroleum wells. / Rahaman, Azizur; Heidrick, T.; Fleck, B.; Koksal, M.

2006 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006. Vol. 2006 2006.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Rahaman, A, Heidrick, T, Fleck, B & Koksal, M 2006, Enhancement of the completion efficiency of perforation tunnels in petroleum wells. in 2006 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006. vol. 2006, 2006 2nd ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006, Miami, FL, United States, 17/7/06.
Rahaman A, Heidrick T, Fleck B, Koksal M. Enhancement of the completion efficiency of perforation tunnels in petroleum wells. In 2006 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006. Vol. 2006. 2006
Rahaman, Azizur ; Heidrick, T. ; Fleck, B. ; Koksal, M. / Enhancement of the completion efficiency of perforation tunnels in petroleum wells. 2006 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006. Vol. 2006 2006.
@inproceedings{c8da2a27c99045059b1c6c7cc3616be1,
title = "Enhancement of the completion efficiency of perforation tunnels in petroleum wells",
abstract = "The objective of perforating is to maximize well productivity by establishing good connectivity between the wellbore and formation. The conventional method of perforation - perforation by shooting (PS) cannot achieve expected wellbore productivity due to a region of reduced permeability around the perforation tunnel. In this study, it has been established that permeability is decreased in the range of 30{\%}-75{\%} due to the implementation of the PS technique compared to the openhole completion. As a result, a new perforation technique - perforation by drilling (PD) has been proposed in this paper. To simulate a perforated completion, cylindrical sand samples (0.0572 m OD) consolidated with cement with varying porosity were prepared. These samples were perforated (0.0136 m ID) by the PS, PD and Casting techniques. Perforations created by the Casting techniques are considered the ideal, openhole perforation tunnel. Fluid flow rates and differential pressure across the perforated samples were measured for three different types of samples using {"}Geotechnical Digital System{"} triaxial testing set-up. Fluid flow rates with changing differential pressure and finally pressure build-up data with time indicates the PD technique can achieve better wellbore productivity compared to the PS technique. Results indicate that at 100 kPa differential pressure the PS, PD and Casting techniques can achieve 0.20 mL/s, 0.65 mL/s and 1.00 mL/s fluid flow rates respectively across a sample.",
keywords = "Formation damage, Perforations, Productivity index, Skin factor",
author = "Azizur Rahaman and T. Heidrick and B. Fleck and M. Koksal",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
isbn = "0791837831",
volume = "2006",
booktitle = "2006 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Enhancement of the completion efficiency of perforation tunnels in petroleum wells

AU - Rahaman, Azizur

AU - Heidrick, T.

AU - Fleck, B.

AU - Koksal, M.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The objective of perforating is to maximize well productivity by establishing good connectivity between the wellbore and formation. The conventional method of perforation - perforation by shooting (PS) cannot achieve expected wellbore productivity due to a region of reduced permeability around the perforation tunnel. In this study, it has been established that permeability is decreased in the range of 30%-75% due to the implementation of the PS technique compared to the openhole completion. As a result, a new perforation technique - perforation by drilling (PD) has been proposed in this paper. To simulate a perforated completion, cylindrical sand samples (0.0572 m OD) consolidated with cement with varying porosity were prepared. These samples were perforated (0.0136 m ID) by the PS, PD and Casting techniques. Perforations created by the Casting techniques are considered the ideal, openhole perforation tunnel. Fluid flow rates and differential pressure across the perforated samples were measured for three different types of samples using "Geotechnical Digital System" triaxial testing set-up. Fluid flow rates with changing differential pressure and finally pressure build-up data with time indicates the PD technique can achieve better wellbore productivity compared to the PS technique. Results indicate that at 100 kPa differential pressure the PS, PD and Casting techniques can achieve 0.20 mL/s, 0.65 mL/s and 1.00 mL/s fluid flow rates respectively across a sample.

AB - The objective of perforating is to maximize well productivity by establishing good connectivity between the wellbore and formation. The conventional method of perforation - perforation by shooting (PS) cannot achieve expected wellbore productivity due to a region of reduced permeability around the perforation tunnel. In this study, it has been established that permeability is decreased in the range of 30%-75% due to the implementation of the PS technique compared to the openhole completion. As a result, a new perforation technique - perforation by drilling (PD) has been proposed in this paper. To simulate a perforated completion, cylindrical sand samples (0.0572 m OD) consolidated with cement with varying porosity were prepared. These samples were perforated (0.0136 m ID) by the PS, PD and Casting techniques. Perforations created by the Casting techniques are considered the ideal, openhole perforation tunnel. Fluid flow rates and differential pressure across the perforated samples were measured for three different types of samples using "Geotechnical Digital System" triaxial testing set-up. Fluid flow rates with changing differential pressure and finally pressure build-up data with time indicates the PD technique can achieve better wellbore productivity compared to the PS technique. Results indicate that at 100 kPa differential pressure the PS, PD and Casting techniques can achieve 0.20 mL/s, 0.65 mL/s and 1.00 mL/s fluid flow rates respectively across a sample.

KW - Formation damage

KW - Perforations

KW - Productivity index

KW - Skin factor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845727064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845727064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0791837831

SN - 9780791837832

VL - 2006

BT - 2006 ASME Joint U.S.-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting, FEDSM 2006

ER -