Electrodynamic dust shield performance under simulated operating conditions for solar energy applications

Bing Guo, Wasim Javed, Charles Pett, Chang Yu Wu, Jonathan R. Scheffe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electrodynamic dust shield (EDS) uses traveling-wave or standing-wave electrodynamic effects to repel dust particles from a surface, and has been proposed as a potential anti-dust solution for mitigating soiling loss in solar energy applications. In this study, a standing-wave EDS technique was tested in a cyclic manner at field-relevant dust loading levels using dust deposited by aerosol deposition, in order to assess the EDS’ dust removal efficiency under simulated real-world operating conditions. Tests using sieve deposition and the single-operation mode were also carried out for comparison. Each single-operation test only used freshly-deposited dust with a single activation of the EDS, and the results showed that the dust removal efficiency with aerosol deposition to be moderately lower than that with sieve deposition. In contrast, a cyclic-operation test consisted of many consecutive cycles, which began with the first cycle using freshly-deposited dust, and each additional cycle having new dust added on top of the persistent dust from the previous cycle. The cyclic-operation dust removal efficiency was found to be strongly dependent on the dust deposition method. Using aerosol deposition, the cyclic-operation efficiency continually decreased as the number of cycles increased; with sieve deposition, the cyclic-operation EDS efficiency fluctuated and had a much higher average value than with aerosol deposition. The different behaviors of the cyclic-operation EDS efficiency can be modeled with two hypothetical scenarios, based on how the persistent dust from a previous cycle reacts to EDS activation. However, the physical mechanisms behind the different behaviors are not well understood. The results from this study suggest that further research is critically needed for evaluating the effectiveness of electrodynamic anti-dust solutions for solar energy applications in dusty environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-85
Number of pages6
JournalSolar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Volume185
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Electrodynamics
Solar energy
Dust
Aerosols
Sieves
Chemical activation

Keywords

  • Aerosol
  • Cleaning efficiency
  • Cyclic operation
  • Dust
  • Electrodynamic dust shield
  • Photovoltaic soiling loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Cite this

Electrodynamic dust shield performance under simulated operating conditions for solar energy applications. / Guo, Bing; Javed, Wasim; Pett, Charles; Wu, Chang Yu; Scheffe, Jonathan R.

In: Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 185, 01.10.2018, p. 80-85.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Guo, Bing ; Javed, Wasim ; Pett, Charles ; Wu, Chang Yu ; Scheffe, Jonathan R. / Electrodynamic dust shield performance under simulated operating conditions for solar energy applications. In: Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. 2018 ; Vol. 185. pp. 80-85.
@article{c97d870bacb144c2ab88e6ab166c911c,
title = "Electrodynamic dust shield performance under simulated operating conditions for solar energy applications",
abstract = "Electrodynamic dust shield (EDS) uses traveling-wave or standing-wave electrodynamic effects to repel dust particles from a surface, and has been proposed as a potential anti-dust solution for mitigating soiling loss in solar energy applications. In this study, a standing-wave EDS technique was tested in a cyclic manner at field-relevant dust loading levels using dust deposited by aerosol deposition, in order to assess the EDS’ dust removal efficiency under simulated real-world operating conditions. Tests using sieve deposition and the single-operation mode were also carried out for comparison. Each single-operation test only used freshly-deposited dust with a single activation of the EDS, and the results showed that the dust removal efficiency with aerosol deposition to be moderately lower than that with sieve deposition. In contrast, a cyclic-operation test consisted of many consecutive cycles, which began with the first cycle using freshly-deposited dust, and each additional cycle having new dust added on top of the persistent dust from the previous cycle. The cyclic-operation dust removal efficiency was found to be strongly dependent on the dust deposition method. Using aerosol deposition, the cyclic-operation efficiency continually decreased as the number of cycles increased; with sieve deposition, the cyclic-operation EDS efficiency fluctuated and had a much higher average value than with aerosol deposition. The different behaviors of the cyclic-operation EDS efficiency can be modeled with two hypothetical scenarios, based on how the persistent dust from a previous cycle reacts to EDS activation. However, the physical mechanisms behind the different behaviors are not well understood. The results from this study suggest that further research is critically needed for evaluating the effectiveness of electrodynamic anti-dust solutions for solar energy applications in dusty environments.",
keywords = "Aerosol, Cleaning efficiency, Cyclic operation, Dust, Electrodynamic dust shield, Photovoltaic soiling loss",
author = "Bing Guo and Wasim Javed and Charles Pett and Wu, {Chang Yu} and Scheffe, {Jonathan R.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.021",
language = "English",
volume = "185",
pages = "80--85",
journal = "Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells",
issn = "0927-0248",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrodynamic dust shield performance under simulated operating conditions for solar energy applications

AU - Guo, Bing

AU - Javed, Wasim

AU - Pett, Charles

AU - Wu, Chang Yu

AU - Scheffe, Jonathan R.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Electrodynamic dust shield (EDS) uses traveling-wave or standing-wave electrodynamic effects to repel dust particles from a surface, and has been proposed as a potential anti-dust solution for mitigating soiling loss in solar energy applications. In this study, a standing-wave EDS technique was tested in a cyclic manner at field-relevant dust loading levels using dust deposited by aerosol deposition, in order to assess the EDS’ dust removal efficiency under simulated real-world operating conditions. Tests using sieve deposition and the single-operation mode were also carried out for comparison. Each single-operation test only used freshly-deposited dust with a single activation of the EDS, and the results showed that the dust removal efficiency with aerosol deposition to be moderately lower than that with sieve deposition. In contrast, a cyclic-operation test consisted of many consecutive cycles, which began with the first cycle using freshly-deposited dust, and each additional cycle having new dust added on top of the persistent dust from the previous cycle. The cyclic-operation dust removal efficiency was found to be strongly dependent on the dust deposition method. Using aerosol deposition, the cyclic-operation efficiency continually decreased as the number of cycles increased; with sieve deposition, the cyclic-operation EDS efficiency fluctuated and had a much higher average value than with aerosol deposition. The different behaviors of the cyclic-operation EDS efficiency can be modeled with two hypothetical scenarios, based on how the persistent dust from a previous cycle reacts to EDS activation. However, the physical mechanisms behind the different behaviors are not well understood. The results from this study suggest that further research is critically needed for evaluating the effectiveness of electrodynamic anti-dust solutions for solar energy applications in dusty environments.

AB - Electrodynamic dust shield (EDS) uses traveling-wave or standing-wave electrodynamic effects to repel dust particles from a surface, and has been proposed as a potential anti-dust solution for mitigating soiling loss in solar energy applications. In this study, a standing-wave EDS technique was tested in a cyclic manner at field-relevant dust loading levels using dust deposited by aerosol deposition, in order to assess the EDS’ dust removal efficiency under simulated real-world operating conditions. Tests using sieve deposition and the single-operation mode were also carried out for comparison. Each single-operation test only used freshly-deposited dust with a single activation of the EDS, and the results showed that the dust removal efficiency with aerosol deposition to be moderately lower than that with sieve deposition. In contrast, a cyclic-operation test consisted of many consecutive cycles, which began with the first cycle using freshly-deposited dust, and each additional cycle having new dust added on top of the persistent dust from the previous cycle. The cyclic-operation dust removal efficiency was found to be strongly dependent on the dust deposition method. Using aerosol deposition, the cyclic-operation efficiency continually decreased as the number of cycles increased; with sieve deposition, the cyclic-operation EDS efficiency fluctuated and had a much higher average value than with aerosol deposition. The different behaviors of the cyclic-operation EDS efficiency can be modeled with two hypothetical scenarios, based on how the persistent dust from a previous cycle reacts to EDS activation. However, the physical mechanisms behind the different behaviors are not well understood. The results from this study suggest that further research is critically needed for evaluating the effectiveness of electrodynamic anti-dust solutions for solar energy applications in dusty environments.

KW - Aerosol

KW - Cleaning efficiency

KW - Cyclic operation

KW - Dust

KW - Electrodynamic dust shield

KW - Photovoltaic soiling loss

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047250662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047250662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.021

DO - 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.021

M3 - Article

VL - 185

SP - 80

EP - 85

JO - Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells

JF - Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells

SN - 0927-0248

ER -