Effects of non-flat interfaces in human skin tissues on the in-vivo Tera-Hertz communication channel

Ke Yang, Qammer Hussain Abbasi, Nishtha Chopra, Max Munoz, Yang Hao, Akram Alomainy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The influence of the interface type between the epidermis and dermis layers within the human skin tissue is investigated in this paper by introducing two models with different interfaces (i.e., 3-D sine and 3-D sinc function). By comparing the power loss of both models, it is evident that the common flat model is sufficient in case of electromagnetic communication links studies within the human tissue without the need of complicated detailed models. There is no significant difference between the power loss results of the flat model to the mean value of the power loss of the stratified model with sinc interface while the difference between the flat one from the stratified model with sine interface is less than 5 dB. However, the influence of the roughness can be presented by the deviation. From the numerical analysis, it is shown that for sine model it reaches almost 10 dB at a distance of 600. μm, when the span changes. Meanwhile, the impact of the antenna location is demonstrated by placing the antennas (dipoles) in two different locations, which shows limited effects (the difference is less than 3 dB). Finally, the impact of the sweat duct is studied, showing its close relationship with the state of the sweat duct that the sweat-filled sweat duct working as PEC would reduce the power loss by almost 5 dB compared with the normal sweat duct without sweat.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-24
Number of pages9
JournalNano Communication Networks
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2015

Fingerprint

Communication Channels
Skin
Tissue
Ducts
Model
3D
Antenna
Sinc Function
Epidermis
Dipole antennas
Human
Roughness
Mean Value
Dipole
Telecommunication links
Numerical analysis
Numerical Analysis
Deviation
Surface roughness
Antennas

Keywords

  • Channel modelling
  • In-body communication
  • Nano communication
  • Skin model
  • THz communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Effects of non-flat interfaces in human skin tissues on the in-vivo Tera-Hertz communication channel. / Yang, Ke; Abbasi, Qammer Hussain; Chopra, Nishtha; Munoz, Max; Hao, Yang; Alomainy, Akram.

In: Nano Communication Networks, Vol. 8, 15.06.2015, p. 16-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yang, Ke ; Abbasi, Qammer Hussain ; Chopra, Nishtha ; Munoz, Max ; Hao, Yang ; Alomainy, Akram. / Effects of non-flat interfaces in human skin tissues on the in-vivo Tera-Hertz communication channel. In: Nano Communication Networks. 2015 ; Vol. 8. pp. 16-24.
@article{292a3173b91d4e0ba99b563e7ac9d00d,
title = "Effects of non-flat interfaces in human skin tissues on the in-vivo Tera-Hertz communication channel",
abstract = "The influence of the interface type between the epidermis and dermis layers within the human skin tissue is investigated in this paper by introducing two models with different interfaces (i.e., 3-D sine and 3-D sinc function). By comparing the power loss of both models, it is evident that the common flat model is sufficient in case of electromagnetic communication links studies within the human tissue without the need of complicated detailed models. There is no significant difference between the power loss results of the flat model to the mean value of the power loss of the stratified model with sinc interface while the difference between the flat one from the stratified model with sine interface is less than 5 dB. However, the influence of the roughness can be presented by the deviation. From the numerical analysis, it is shown that for sine model it reaches almost 10 dB at a distance of 600. μm, when the span changes. Meanwhile, the impact of the antenna location is demonstrated by placing the antennas (dipoles) in two different locations, which shows limited effects (the difference is less than 3 dB). Finally, the impact of the sweat duct is studied, showing its close relationship with the state of the sweat duct that the sweat-filled sweat duct working as PEC would reduce the power loss by almost 5 dB compared with the normal sweat duct without sweat.",
keywords = "Channel modelling, In-body communication, Nano communication, Skin model, THz communication",
author = "Ke Yang and Abbasi, {Qammer Hussain} and Nishtha Chopra and Max Munoz and Yang Hao and Akram Alomainy",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.nancom.2015.09.001",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "16--24",
journal = "Nano Communication Networks",
issn = "1878-7789",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of non-flat interfaces in human skin tissues on the in-vivo Tera-Hertz communication channel

AU - Yang, Ke

AU - Abbasi, Qammer Hussain

AU - Chopra, Nishtha

AU - Munoz, Max

AU - Hao, Yang

AU - Alomainy, Akram

PY - 2015/6/15

Y1 - 2015/6/15

N2 - The influence of the interface type between the epidermis and dermis layers within the human skin tissue is investigated in this paper by introducing two models with different interfaces (i.e., 3-D sine and 3-D sinc function). By comparing the power loss of both models, it is evident that the common flat model is sufficient in case of electromagnetic communication links studies within the human tissue without the need of complicated detailed models. There is no significant difference between the power loss results of the flat model to the mean value of the power loss of the stratified model with sinc interface while the difference between the flat one from the stratified model with sine interface is less than 5 dB. However, the influence of the roughness can be presented by the deviation. From the numerical analysis, it is shown that for sine model it reaches almost 10 dB at a distance of 600. μm, when the span changes. Meanwhile, the impact of the antenna location is demonstrated by placing the antennas (dipoles) in two different locations, which shows limited effects (the difference is less than 3 dB). Finally, the impact of the sweat duct is studied, showing its close relationship with the state of the sweat duct that the sweat-filled sweat duct working as PEC would reduce the power loss by almost 5 dB compared with the normal sweat duct without sweat.

AB - The influence of the interface type between the epidermis and dermis layers within the human skin tissue is investigated in this paper by introducing two models with different interfaces (i.e., 3-D sine and 3-D sinc function). By comparing the power loss of both models, it is evident that the common flat model is sufficient in case of electromagnetic communication links studies within the human tissue without the need of complicated detailed models. There is no significant difference between the power loss results of the flat model to the mean value of the power loss of the stratified model with sinc interface while the difference between the flat one from the stratified model with sine interface is less than 5 dB. However, the influence of the roughness can be presented by the deviation. From the numerical analysis, it is shown that for sine model it reaches almost 10 dB at a distance of 600. μm, when the span changes. Meanwhile, the impact of the antenna location is demonstrated by placing the antennas (dipoles) in two different locations, which shows limited effects (the difference is less than 3 dB). Finally, the impact of the sweat duct is studied, showing its close relationship with the state of the sweat duct that the sweat-filled sweat duct working as PEC would reduce the power loss by almost 5 dB compared with the normal sweat duct without sweat.

KW - Channel modelling

KW - In-body communication

KW - Nano communication

KW - Skin model

KW - THz communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947590777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947590777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nancom.2015.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.nancom.2015.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 16

EP - 24

JO - Nano Communication Networks

JF - Nano Communication Networks

SN - 1878-7789

ER -