Effects of fusion zone size on failure modes and static strength of aluminum resistance spot welds

X. Sun, E. V. Stephens, R. W. Davies, M. A. Khaleel, D. J. Spinella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of fusion zone size on failure modes, static strength, and energy absorption of aluminum spot welded samples using a combined experimental, statistical, and analytical approach. The main failure modes for aluminum spot welds are nugget pullout and interfacial fracture. First, static strength tests using coupon configurations of lap shear, cross tension, and coach peel were performed on the joint populations with a controlled fusion zone size. Thirty replicate static strength tests were performed for each coupon configuration. The resulting peak load and energy absorption levels associated with each failure mode were studied using statistical models. Next, an analytical model was developed to determine the failure mode of an aluminum resistance spot weld based on limit load analyses. It was found that fusion zone size, sheet thickness, and the level and location of weld porosity/defects are the main factors influencing the cross-tension failure mode of an aluminum spot weld. Two additional spot weld populations with different fusion zone sizes were then fabricated to validate the analytical failure mode model. Static cross-tension tests were again performed, and the experimental observations confirmed the analytically predicted failure modes for each population.

Original languageEnglish
JournalWelding Journal (Miami, Fla)
Volume83
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aluminum
Failure modes
Welds
Fusion reactions
Energy absorption
Load limits
Analytical models
Porosity
Defects

Keywords

  • Aluminum Sheet Metal
  • Coach Peel Test Lap Shear Test
  • Cross-Tension Test
  • Failure Modes
  • Fusion Zone Size Weld
  • Resistance Spot Welding
  • Weibull Distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Metals and Alloys

Cite this

Sun, X., Stephens, E. V., Davies, R. W., Khaleel, M. A., & Spinella, D. J. (2004). Effects of fusion zone size on failure modes and static strength of aluminum resistance spot welds. Welding Journal (Miami, Fla), 83(11).

Effects of fusion zone size on failure modes and static strength of aluminum resistance spot welds. / Sun, X.; Stephens, E. V.; Davies, R. W.; Khaleel, M. A.; Spinella, D. J.

In: Welding Journal (Miami, Fla), Vol. 83, No. 11, 01.11.2004.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sun, X, Stephens, EV, Davies, RW, Khaleel, MA & Spinella, DJ 2004, 'Effects of fusion zone size on failure modes and static strength of aluminum resistance spot welds', Welding Journal (Miami, Fla), vol. 83, no. 11.
Sun, X. ; Stephens, E. V. ; Davies, R. W. ; Khaleel, M. A. ; Spinella, D. J. / Effects of fusion zone size on failure modes and static strength of aluminum resistance spot welds. In: Welding Journal (Miami, Fla). 2004 ; Vol. 83, No. 11.
@article{4bdc2c3eb141413b92e23b88a2089783,
title = "Effects of fusion zone size on failure modes and static strength of aluminum resistance spot welds",
abstract = "This paper examines the effects of fusion zone size on failure modes, static strength, and energy absorption of aluminum spot welded samples using a combined experimental, statistical, and analytical approach. The main failure modes for aluminum spot welds are nugget pullout and interfacial fracture. First, static strength tests using coupon configurations of lap shear, cross tension, and coach peel were performed on the joint populations with a controlled fusion zone size. Thirty replicate static strength tests were performed for each coupon configuration. The resulting peak load and energy absorption levels associated with each failure mode were studied using statistical models. Next, an analytical model was developed to determine the failure mode of an aluminum resistance spot weld based on limit load analyses. It was found that fusion zone size, sheet thickness, and the level and location of weld porosity/defects are the main factors influencing the cross-tension failure mode of an aluminum spot weld. Two additional spot weld populations with different fusion zone sizes were then fabricated to validate the analytical failure mode model. Static cross-tension tests were again performed, and the experimental observations confirmed the analytically predicted failure modes for each population.",
keywords = "Aluminum Sheet Metal, Coach Peel Test Lap Shear Test, Cross-Tension Test, Failure Modes, Fusion Zone Size Weld, Resistance Spot Welding, Weibull Distribution",
author = "X. Sun and Stephens, {E. V.} and Davies, {R. W.} and Khaleel, {M. A.} and Spinella, {D. J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
journal = "Welding Journal",
issn = "0043-2296",
publisher = "American Welding Society",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of fusion zone size on failure modes and static strength of aluminum resistance spot welds

AU - Sun, X.

AU - Stephens, E. V.

AU - Davies, R. W.

AU - Khaleel, M. A.

AU - Spinella, D. J.

PY - 2004/11/1

Y1 - 2004/11/1

N2 - This paper examines the effects of fusion zone size on failure modes, static strength, and energy absorption of aluminum spot welded samples using a combined experimental, statistical, and analytical approach. The main failure modes for aluminum spot welds are nugget pullout and interfacial fracture. First, static strength tests using coupon configurations of lap shear, cross tension, and coach peel were performed on the joint populations with a controlled fusion zone size. Thirty replicate static strength tests were performed for each coupon configuration. The resulting peak load and energy absorption levels associated with each failure mode were studied using statistical models. Next, an analytical model was developed to determine the failure mode of an aluminum resistance spot weld based on limit load analyses. It was found that fusion zone size, sheet thickness, and the level and location of weld porosity/defects are the main factors influencing the cross-tension failure mode of an aluminum spot weld. Two additional spot weld populations with different fusion zone sizes were then fabricated to validate the analytical failure mode model. Static cross-tension tests were again performed, and the experimental observations confirmed the analytically predicted failure modes for each population.

AB - This paper examines the effects of fusion zone size on failure modes, static strength, and energy absorption of aluminum spot welded samples using a combined experimental, statistical, and analytical approach. The main failure modes for aluminum spot welds are nugget pullout and interfacial fracture. First, static strength tests using coupon configurations of lap shear, cross tension, and coach peel were performed on the joint populations with a controlled fusion zone size. Thirty replicate static strength tests were performed for each coupon configuration. The resulting peak load and energy absorption levels associated with each failure mode were studied using statistical models. Next, an analytical model was developed to determine the failure mode of an aluminum resistance spot weld based on limit load analyses. It was found that fusion zone size, sheet thickness, and the level and location of weld porosity/defects are the main factors influencing the cross-tension failure mode of an aluminum spot weld. Two additional spot weld populations with different fusion zone sizes were then fabricated to validate the analytical failure mode model. Static cross-tension tests were again performed, and the experimental observations confirmed the analytically predicted failure modes for each population.

KW - Aluminum Sheet Metal

KW - Coach Peel Test Lap Shear Test

KW - Cross-Tension Test

KW - Failure Modes

KW - Fusion Zone Size Weld

KW - Resistance Spot Welding

KW - Weibull Distribution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9744222018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9744222018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:9744222018

VL - 83

JO - Welding Journal

JF - Welding Journal

SN - 0043-2296

IS - 11

ER -