Effect of language proficiency and degree of formal training in simultaneous interpreting on working memory and interpreting performance

Evidence from Mandarin-English speakers

Yeh Zu Tzou, Zohreh Eslami, Hsin Chin Chen, Jyotsna Vaid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The influence of second language proficiency and length of formal training in interpretation on simultaneous interpreting (SI) performance and working memory was examined in Mandarin-English student interpreters with one year (n = 11) or two years of formal training in interpretation (n = 9) and in 16 Mandarin-English untrained bilingual controls. SI performance was significantly better in Year 2 than in Year 1 student interpreters, and in Year 1 interpreters relative to bilingual controls. SI performance was also better in advanced L2 users and in high-memory span individuals, whether trained or not in SI. Both Year 1 and Year 2 students outperformed bilingual controls in L1 and L2 reading span. Although Year 2 students tended to show higher working memory span than Year 1 students, the difference was not significant. Finally, working memory span was higher in individuals with greater L2 proficiency. It is concluded that differences in language proficiency may underlie observed differences in both interpreting performance and working memory and that language processing skills (rather than working memory) may be enhanced by formal training in interpreting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)213-227
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Bilingualism
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

interpreter
language
performance
evidence
student
interpretation
English Speakers
Simultaneous Interpreting
Language Proficiency
Working Memory
Memory Span
Interpreter
L2 Reading
L2 Users
Second Language Proficiency
Reading Span
Bilingual Students
Length
L2 Proficiency
Language Processing

Keywords

  • digit span
  • reading span
  • simultaneous interpreting
  • working memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

@article{0cf1b233073b495abe4830e1594d6d2a,
title = "Effect of language proficiency and degree of formal training in simultaneous interpreting on working memory and interpreting performance: Evidence from Mandarin-English speakers",
abstract = "The influence of second language proficiency and length of formal training in interpretation on simultaneous interpreting (SI) performance and working memory was examined in Mandarin-English student interpreters with one year (n = 11) or two years of formal training in interpretation (n = 9) and in 16 Mandarin-English untrained bilingual controls. SI performance was significantly better in Year 2 than in Year 1 student interpreters, and in Year 1 interpreters relative to bilingual controls. SI performance was also better in advanced L2 users and in high-memory span individuals, whether trained or not in SI. Both Year 1 and Year 2 students outperformed bilingual controls in L1 and L2 reading span. Although Year 2 students tended to show higher working memory span than Year 1 students, the difference was not significant. Finally, working memory span was higher in individuals with greater L2 proficiency. It is concluded that differences in language proficiency may underlie observed differences in both interpreting performance and working memory and that language processing skills (rather than working memory) may be enhanced by formal training in interpreting.",
keywords = "digit span, reading span, simultaneous interpreting, working memory",
author = "Tzou, {Yeh Zu} and Zohreh Eslami and Chen, {Hsin Chin} and Jyotsna Vaid",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1367006911403197",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "213--227",
journal = "International Journal of Bilingualism",
issn = "1367-0069",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of language proficiency and degree of formal training in simultaneous interpreting on working memory and interpreting performance

T2 - Evidence from Mandarin-English speakers

AU - Tzou, Yeh Zu

AU - Eslami, Zohreh

AU - Chen, Hsin Chin

AU - Vaid, Jyotsna

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - The influence of second language proficiency and length of formal training in interpretation on simultaneous interpreting (SI) performance and working memory was examined in Mandarin-English student interpreters with one year (n = 11) or two years of formal training in interpretation (n = 9) and in 16 Mandarin-English untrained bilingual controls. SI performance was significantly better in Year 2 than in Year 1 student interpreters, and in Year 1 interpreters relative to bilingual controls. SI performance was also better in advanced L2 users and in high-memory span individuals, whether trained or not in SI. Both Year 1 and Year 2 students outperformed bilingual controls in L1 and L2 reading span. Although Year 2 students tended to show higher working memory span than Year 1 students, the difference was not significant. Finally, working memory span was higher in individuals with greater L2 proficiency. It is concluded that differences in language proficiency may underlie observed differences in both interpreting performance and working memory and that language processing skills (rather than working memory) may be enhanced by formal training in interpreting.

AB - The influence of second language proficiency and length of formal training in interpretation on simultaneous interpreting (SI) performance and working memory was examined in Mandarin-English student interpreters with one year (n = 11) or two years of formal training in interpretation (n = 9) and in 16 Mandarin-English untrained bilingual controls. SI performance was significantly better in Year 2 than in Year 1 student interpreters, and in Year 1 interpreters relative to bilingual controls. SI performance was also better in advanced L2 users and in high-memory span individuals, whether trained or not in SI. Both Year 1 and Year 2 students outperformed bilingual controls in L1 and L2 reading span. Although Year 2 students tended to show higher working memory span than Year 1 students, the difference was not significant. Finally, working memory span was higher in individuals with greater L2 proficiency. It is concluded that differences in language proficiency may underlie observed differences in both interpreting performance and working memory and that language processing skills (rather than working memory) may be enhanced by formal training in interpreting.

KW - digit span

KW - reading span

KW - simultaneous interpreting

KW - working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861951537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861951537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1367006911403197

DO - 10.1177/1367006911403197

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 213

EP - 227

JO - International Journal of Bilingualism

JF - International Journal of Bilingualism

SN - 1367-0069

IS - 2

ER -