Distinct dynamics of aurora b and survivin during mitosis

Marlène Delacour-Larose, Annie Molla, Dimitrios A. Skoufias, Robert L. Margolis, Stefan Dimitrov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have studied the dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin during mitosis in living cells, using C-terminal GFP chimeras of the two proteins. These chimeras showed identical localization and behave as bona fide wild type proteins. The mobility of Aurora B-GFP and Survivin-GFP was analyzed by FRAP. The data show that Survivin-GFP, in contrast to Aurora B-GFP, is highly mobile at prometaphase and metaphase. At telophase and cell cleavage, both chimeras are found to be fully immobile. The ablation of Aurora B by siRNA results in a dramatic decrease of the Survivin-GFP mobility. These results demonstrate that Survivin, but not Aurora B, is weakly associated with the centromeric chromatin at prometaphase and metaphase. The weak association of Survivin with centromeric chromatin is dependent on the presence of Aurora B and is not affected by treatment with either nocodazole or taxol. The rapid and conditional interchange between passenger proteins that we show by live imaging indicates that the high affinity interactions demonstrated with in vitro analysis of passenger protein binding are, in fact, static "snapshots" of highly dynamic and regulated in vivo interactions in mitotic cells.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1418-1426
Number of pages9
JournalCell Cycle
Volume3
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mitosis
Prometaphase
Metaphase
Chromatin
Telophase
Nocodazole
Proteins
Paclitaxel
Protein Binding
Small Interfering RNA

Keywords

  • Aurora B
  • Dynamics
  • FRAP
  • Mitosis
  • Survivin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Delacour-Larose, M., Molla, A., Skoufias, D. A., Margolis, R. L., & Dimitrov, S. (2004). Distinct dynamics of aurora b and survivin during mitosis. Cell Cycle, 3(11), 1418-1426.

Distinct dynamics of aurora b and survivin during mitosis. / Delacour-Larose, Marlène; Molla, Annie; Skoufias, Dimitrios A.; Margolis, Robert L.; Dimitrov, Stefan.

In: Cell Cycle, Vol. 3, No. 11, 2004, p. 1418-1426.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Delacour-Larose, M, Molla, A, Skoufias, DA, Margolis, RL & Dimitrov, S 2004, 'Distinct dynamics of aurora b and survivin during mitosis', Cell Cycle, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1418-1426.
Delacour-Larose M, Molla A, Skoufias DA, Margolis RL, Dimitrov S. Distinct dynamics of aurora b and survivin during mitosis. Cell Cycle. 2004;3(11):1418-1426.
Delacour-Larose, Marlène ; Molla, Annie ; Skoufias, Dimitrios A. ; Margolis, Robert L. ; Dimitrov, Stefan. / Distinct dynamics of aurora b and survivin during mitosis. In: Cell Cycle. 2004 ; Vol. 3, No. 11. pp. 1418-1426.
@article{35174f4930f14fd5893e40291af0e11f,
title = "Distinct dynamics of aurora b and survivin during mitosis",
abstract = "We have studied the dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin during mitosis in living cells, using C-terminal GFP chimeras of the two proteins. These chimeras showed identical localization and behave as bona fide wild type proteins. The mobility of Aurora B-GFP and Survivin-GFP was analyzed by FRAP. The data show that Survivin-GFP, in contrast to Aurora B-GFP, is highly mobile at prometaphase and metaphase. At telophase and cell cleavage, both chimeras are found to be fully immobile. The ablation of Aurora B by siRNA results in a dramatic decrease of the Survivin-GFP mobility. These results demonstrate that Survivin, but not Aurora B, is weakly associated with the centromeric chromatin at prometaphase and metaphase. The weak association of Survivin with centromeric chromatin is dependent on the presence of Aurora B and is not affected by treatment with either nocodazole or taxol. The rapid and conditional interchange between passenger proteins that we show by live imaging indicates that the high affinity interactions demonstrated with in vitro analysis of passenger protein binding are, in fact, static {"}snapshots{"} of highly dynamic and regulated in vivo interactions in mitotic cells.",
keywords = "Aurora B, Dynamics, FRAP, Mitosis, Survivin",
author = "Marl{\`e}ne Delacour-Larose and Annie Molla and Skoufias, {Dimitrios A.} and Margolis, {Robert L.} and Stefan Dimitrov",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "1418--1426",
journal = "Cell Cycle",
issn = "1538-4101",
publisher = "Landes Bioscience",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinct dynamics of aurora b and survivin during mitosis

AU - Delacour-Larose, Marlène

AU - Molla, Annie

AU - Skoufias, Dimitrios A.

AU - Margolis, Robert L.

AU - Dimitrov, Stefan

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - We have studied the dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin during mitosis in living cells, using C-terminal GFP chimeras of the two proteins. These chimeras showed identical localization and behave as bona fide wild type proteins. The mobility of Aurora B-GFP and Survivin-GFP was analyzed by FRAP. The data show that Survivin-GFP, in contrast to Aurora B-GFP, is highly mobile at prometaphase and metaphase. At telophase and cell cleavage, both chimeras are found to be fully immobile. The ablation of Aurora B by siRNA results in a dramatic decrease of the Survivin-GFP mobility. These results demonstrate that Survivin, but not Aurora B, is weakly associated with the centromeric chromatin at prometaphase and metaphase. The weak association of Survivin with centromeric chromatin is dependent on the presence of Aurora B and is not affected by treatment with either nocodazole or taxol. The rapid and conditional interchange between passenger proteins that we show by live imaging indicates that the high affinity interactions demonstrated with in vitro analysis of passenger protein binding are, in fact, static "snapshots" of highly dynamic and regulated in vivo interactions in mitotic cells.

AB - We have studied the dynamics of Aurora B and Survivin during mitosis in living cells, using C-terminal GFP chimeras of the two proteins. These chimeras showed identical localization and behave as bona fide wild type proteins. The mobility of Aurora B-GFP and Survivin-GFP was analyzed by FRAP. The data show that Survivin-GFP, in contrast to Aurora B-GFP, is highly mobile at prometaphase and metaphase. At telophase and cell cleavage, both chimeras are found to be fully immobile. The ablation of Aurora B by siRNA results in a dramatic decrease of the Survivin-GFP mobility. These results demonstrate that Survivin, but not Aurora B, is weakly associated with the centromeric chromatin at prometaphase and metaphase. The weak association of Survivin with centromeric chromatin is dependent on the presence of Aurora B and is not affected by treatment with either nocodazole or taxol. The rapid and conditional interchange between passenger proteins that we show by live imaging indicates that the high affinity interactions demonstrated with in vitro analysis of passenger protein binding are, in fact, static "snapshots" of highly dynamic and regulated in vivo interactions in mitotic cells.

KW - Aurora B

KW - Dynamics

KW - FRAP

KW - Mitosis

KW - Survivin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14644399115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14644399115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 1418

EP - 1426

JO - Cell Cycle

JF - Cell Cycle

SN - 1538-4101

IS - 11

ER -