Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy

Uazman Alam, Maria Jeziorska, Ioannis N. Petropoulos, Omar Asghar, Hassan Fadavi, Georgios Ponirakis, Andrew Marshall, Mitra Tavakoli, Andrew J.M. Boulton, Nathan Efron, Rayaz Malik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible technique that quantifies small nerve fibres. We have compared the diagnostic capability of CCM against a range of established measures of nerve damage in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Methods In this cross sectional study, thirty subjects with Type 1 diabetes without neuropathy (T1DM), thirty one T1DM subjects with neuropathy (DSPN) and twenty seven non-diabetic healthy control subjects underwent detailed assessment of neuropathic symptoms and neurologic deficits, quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrophysiology, skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Results Subjects with DSPN were older (C vs T1DM vs DSPN: 41.0±14.9 vs 38.8±12.5 vs 53.3 ±11.9, P = 0.0002), had a longer duration of diabetes (P<0.0001), lower eGFR (P = 0.006) and higher albumin-creatinine ratio (P = 0.03) with no significant difference for HbA1c, BMI, lipids and blood pressure. Patients with DSPN were representative of subjects with diabetic neuropathy with clinical signs and symptoms of neuropathy and greater neuropathy deficits quantified by QST, electrophysiology, intra-epidermal nerve fibre density and CCM. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) (Spearman's Rho = 0.60 P<0.0001) and IENFD (Spearman's Rho = 0.56 P<0.0001) were comparable when correlated with peroneal nerve conduction velocity. For the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy the sensitivity for CNFD was 0.77 and specificity was 0.79 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81. IENFD had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.61, specificity of 0.80 and area under the ROC curve of 0.73. Conclusions CCM is a valid accurate non-invasive method to identify small nerve fibre pathology and is able to diagnose DPN.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0180175
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

diabetic neuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies
Confocal microscopy
nerve fibers
Nerve Fibers
Confocal Microscopy
peripheral nervous system diseases
Fibers
Electrophysiology
electrophysiology
Medical problems
ROC Curve
Area Under Curve
nerve tissue
diagnostic sensitivity
Peroneal Nerve
glycohemoglobin
Symptom Assessment
insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy. / Alam, Uazman; Jeziorska, Maria; Petropoulos, Ioannis N.; Asghar, Omar; Fadavi, Hassan; Ponirakis, Georgios; Marshall, Andrew; Tavakoli, Mitra; Boulton, Andrew J.M.; Efron, Nathan; Malik, Rayaz.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 12, No. 7, e0180175, 01.07.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alam, U, Jeziorska, M, Petropoulos, IN, Asghar, O, Fadavi, H, Ponirakis, G, Marshall, A, Tavakoli, M, Boulton, AJM, Efron, N & Malik, R 2017, 'Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy', PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 7, e0180175. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180175
Alam, Uazman ; Jeziorska, Maria ; Petropoulos, Ioannis N. ; Asghar, Omar ; Fadavi, Hassan ; Ponirakis, Georgios ; Marshall, Andrew ; Tavakoli, Mitra ; Boulton, Andrew J.M. ; Efron, Nathan ; Malik, Rayaz. / Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy. In: PLoS One. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 7.
@article{305f80d20aba464bb95c8b470ccf5938,
title = "Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy",
abstract = "Objectives Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible technique that quantifies small nerve fibres. We have compared the diagnostic capability of CCM against a range of established measures of nerve damage in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Methods In this cross sectional study, thirty subjects with Type 1 diabetes without neuropathy (T1DM), thirty one T1DM subjects with neuropathy (DSPN) and twenty seven non-diabetic healthy control subjects underwent detailed assessment of neuropathic symptoms and neurologic deficits, quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrophysiology, skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Results Subjects with DSPN were older (C vs T1DM vs DSPN: 41.0±14.9 vs 38.8±12.5 vs 53.3 ±11.9, P = 0.0002), had a longer duration of diabetes (P<0.0001), lower eGFR (P = 0.006) and higher albumin-creatinine ratio (P = 0.03) with no significant difference for HbA1c, BMI, lipids and blood pressure. Patients with DSPN were representative of subjects with diabetic neuropathy with clinical signs and symptoms of neuropathy and greater neuropathy deficits quantified by QST, electrophysiology, intra-epidermal nerve fibre density and CCM. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) (Spearman's Rho = 0.60 P<0.0001) and IENFD (Spearman's Rho = 0.56 P<0.0001) were comparable when correlated with peroneal nerve conduction velocity. For the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy the sensitivity for CNFD was 0.77 and specificity was 0.79 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81. IENFD had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.61, specificity of 0.80 and area under the ROC curve of 0.73. Conclusions CCM is a valid accurate non-invasive method to identify small nerve fibre pathology and is able to diagnose DPN.",
author = "Uazman Alam and Maria Jeziorska and Petropoulos, {Ioannis N.} and Omar Asghar and Hassan Fadavi and Georgios Ponirakis and Andrew Marshall and Mitra Tavakoli and Boulton, {Andrew J.M.} and Nathan Efron and Rayaz Malik",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0180175",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic utility of corneal confocal microscopy and intra-epidermal nerve fibre density in diabetic neuropathy

AU - Alam, Uazman

AU - Jeziorska, Maria

AU - Petropoulos, Ioannis N.

AU - Asghar, Omar

AU - Fadavi, Hassan

AU - Ponirakis, Georgios

AU - Marshall, Andrew

AU - Tavakoli, Mitra

AU - Boulton, Andrew J.M.

AU - Efron, Nathan

AU - Malik, Rayaz

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Objectives Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible technique that quantifies small nerve fibres. We have compared the diagnostic capability of CCM against a range of established measures of nerve damage in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Methods In this cross sectional study, thirty subjects with Type 1 diabetes without neuropathy (T1DM), thirty one T1DM subjects with neuropathy (DSPN) and twenty seven non-diabetic healthy control subjects underwent detailed assessment of neuropathic symptoms and neurologic deficits, quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrophysiology, skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Results Subjects with DSPN were older (C vs T1DM vs DSPN: 41.0±14.9 vs 38.8±12.5 vs 53.3 ±11.9, P = 0.0002), had a longer duration of diabetes (P<0.0001), lower eGFR (P = 0.006) and higher albumin-creatinine ratio (P = 0.03) with no significant difference for HbA1c, BMI, lipids and blood pressure. Patients with DSPN were representative of subjects with diabetic neuropathy with clinical signs and symptoms of neuropathy and greater neuropathy deficits quantified by QST, electrophysiology, intra-epidermal nerve fibre density and CCM. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) (Spearman's Rho = 0.60 P<0.0001) and IENFD (Spearman's Rho = 0.56 P<0.0001) were comparable when correlated with peroneal nerve conduction velocity. For the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy the sensitivity for CNFD was 0.77 and specificity was 0.79 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81. IENFD had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.61, specificity of 0.80 and area under the ROC curve of 0.73. Conclusions CCM is a valid accurate non-invasive method to identify small nerve fibre pathology and is able to diagnose DPN.

AB - Objectives Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, reproducible technique that quantifies small nerve fibres. We have compared the diagnostic capability of CCM against a range of established measures of nerve damage in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Methods In this cross sectional study, thirty subjects with Type 1 diabetes without neuropathy (T1DM), thirty one T1DM subjects with neuropathy (DSPN) and twenty seven non-diabetic healthy control subjects underwent detailed assessment of neuropathic symptoms and neurologic deficits, quantitative sensory testing (QST), electrophysiology, skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Results Subjects with DSPN were older (C vs T1DM vs DSPN: 41.0±14.9 vs 38.8±12.5 vs 53.3 ±11.9, P = 0.0002), had a longer duration of diabetes (P<0.0001), lower eGFR (P = 0.006) and higher albumin-creatinine ratio (P = 0.03) with no significant difference for HbA1c, BMI, lipids and blood pressure. Patients with DSPN were representative of subjects with diabetic neuropathy with clinical signs and symptoms of neuropathy and greater neuropathy deficits quantified by QST, electrophysiology, intra-epidermal nerve fibre density and CCM. Corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD) (Spearman's Rho = 0.60 P<0.0001) and IENFD (Spearman's Rho = 0.56 P<0.0001) were comparable when correlated with peroneal nerve conduction velocity. For the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy the sensitivity for CNFD was 0.77 and specificity was 0.79 with an area under the ROC curve of 0.81. IENFD had a diagnostic sensitivity of 0.61, specificity of 0.80 and area under the ROC curve of 0.73. Conclusions CCM is a valid accurate non-invasive method to identify small nerve fibre pathology and is able to diagnose DPN.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025105711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025105711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180175

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0180175

M3 - Article

C2 - 28719619

AN - SCOPUS:85025105711

VL - 12

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0180175

ER -