Defining defamation

Community in the age of the internet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to instantly communicate with a global audience has created numerous legal uncertainties as jurists struggle to adapt age-old jurisprudence to modern-day technologies-and defamation jurisprudence is no exception. The definition of a plaintiff's community is critical to his or her ability to succeed in a defamation lawsuit, often determining whether the plaintiff is a public figure or whether the plaintiff's reputation has been injured in his or her community. This article examines federal and state defamation jurisprudence to compare the factors courts have used to define community in both traditional print and broadcast cases with the factors used in more recent Internet defamation cases. It then suggests three possible rubrics courts could employ to more uniformly define community in Internet defamation cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-264
Number of pages34
JournalCommunication Law and Policy
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

jurisprudence
Internet
community
jurist
lawsuit
ability
broadcast
reputation
uncertainty
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Communication

Cite this

Defining defamation : Community in the age of the internet. / Sanders, Amy.

In: Communication Law and Policy, Vol. 15, No. 3, 06.2010, p. 231-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{06b18e67a77f44c3a3443c66e5632934,
title = "Defining defamation: Community in the age of the internet",
abstract = "The ability to instantly communicate with a global audience has created numerous legal uncertainties as jurists struggle to adapt age-old jurisprudence to modern-day technologies-and defamation jurisprudence is no exception. The definition of a plaintiff's community is critical to his or her ability to succeed in a defamation lawsuit, often determining whether the plaintiff is a public figure or whether the plaintiff's reputation has been injured in his or her community. This article examines federal and state defamation jurisprudence to compare the factors courts have used to define community in both traditional print and broadcast cases with the factors used in more recent Internet defamation cases. It then suggests three possible rubrics courts could employ to more uniformly define community in Internet defamation cases.",
author = "Amy Sanders",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/10811680.2010.489845",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "231--264",
journal = "Communication Law and Policy",
issn = "1081-1680",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining defamation

T2 - Community in the age of the internet

AU - Sanders, Amy

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - The ability to instantly communicate with a global audience has created numerous legal uncertainties as jurists struggle to adapt age-old jurisprudence to modern-day technologies-and defamation jurisprudence is no exception. The definition of a plaintiff's community is critical to his or her ability to succeed in a defamation lawsuit, often determining whether the plaintiff is a public figure or whether the plaintiff's reputation has been injured in his or her community. This article examines federal and state defamation jurisprudence to compare the factors courts have used to define community in both traditional print and broadcast cases with the factors used in more recent Internet defamation cases. It then suggests three possible rubrics courts could employ to more uniformly define community in Internet defamation cases.

AB - The ability to instantly communicate with a global audience has created numerous legal uncertainties as jurists struggle to adapt age-old jurisprudence to modern-day technologies-and defamation jurisprudence is no exception. The definition of a plaintiff's community is critical to his or her ability to succeed in a defamation lawsuit, often determining whether the plaintiff is a public figure or whether the plaintiff's reputation has been injured in his or her community. This article examines federal and state defamation jurisprudence to compare the factors courts have used to define community in both traditional print and broadcast cases with the factors used in more recent Internet defamation cases. It then suggests three possible rubrics courts could employ to more uniformly define community in Internet defamation cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954334336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954334336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10811680.2010.489845

DO - 10.1080/10811680.2010.489845

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 231

EP - 264

JO - Communication Law and Policy

JF - Communication Law and Policy

SN - 1081-1680

IS - 3

ER -